Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.
In the past four decades, behavioral economists and cognitive psychologists have discovered many cognitive biases human brains fall prey to when thinking and deciding.
Less Wrong is an online community for people who want to apply the discovery of biases like the conjunction fallacy, the affect heuristic, and scope insensitivity in order to improve their own thinking.
Bayesian reasoning offers a way to improve on the native human reasoning style. Reasoning naively, we tend not to seek alternative explanations, and sometimes underrate the influence of prior probabilities in Bayes' theorem.
Less Wrong users aim to develop accurate predictive models of the world, and change their mind when they find evidence disconfirming those models, instead of being able to explain anything.
For more, see the Less Wrong about page and FAQ.


>How much havoc do you think a two-hour movie can wreak on your judgment? It will be hard enough to undo the damage by deliberate concentration—why invite the vampire into your house? In Chess or Go, every wasted move is a loss; in rationality, any non-evidential influence is (on average) entropic. >Yet in my estimation, the most damaging aspect of using other authors' imaginations is that it stops people from using their own 10 years later, post HPMOR, the irony of this is delicious. Not denying the value of the underlying point -- but one could gather from this post that EY is against consuming fiction *in general*, lest it poison your mind, and particularly against allowing your ideas to be influenced by other author's ideas. His current notoriety as one of the most pre-eminent writers of fan-fiction makes this thought amusing.
by Gradus on The Logical Fallacy of Generalization from Fictional Evidence | 0 points