Pei’s University Village Tops List of 7 Landmarks

Silver Towers/University VillageSilver Towers/University Village, north of Houston Street between Mercer Street and La Guardia Place. (Photos: New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission)

Silver Towers/University Village, three concrete towers designed by I. M. Pei that were part of Robert Moses’s vast urban renewal program for Greenwich Village, was one of seven landmarks officially designated on Tuesday by the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission.

The six other newly designated landmarks include aluminum-clad low-rise office building by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill and a late 19th-century cast-iron commercial building.

The process of designating Silver Towers as a landmark started in February, although the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation and other advocacy groups have been pushing the idea since 2003. New York University, whose proposed campus expansion has caused concern in the surrounding neighborhoods, backed the designation, as did, among others, Sylvette David, a former muse for Pablo Picasso and the inspiration for “Bust of Sylvette,” the 36-foot-tall concrete sculpture that has rested among the buildings since 1968.

The westernmost of the complex’s three towers, at 505 La Guardia Place, is a middle-income cooperative, where the owners and residents supported the landmark designation. N.Y.U. owns the other two towers, on the eastern side, which house faculty members and were named the Silver Towers in 1974 in honor of Julius Silver, a lawyer and a donor.

The three identical reinforced-concrete 30-story towers were part of a five-acre residential “superblock” complex, just north of Houston Street, between Mercer Street and La Guardia Place, that was completed in 1967 and designed by the architect James Ingo Freed of I. M. Pei & Associates. The towers reflected the ideas of Le Corbusier. Each floor has four or eight deeply recessed horizontal window bays and a 22-foot-wide sheer wall.

“It’s widely known as one of the finest modern residential complexes in the city,” said Robert B. Tierney, the landmarks commission chairman. “The configuration, style and park-like setting of the towers create an undeniable tension between the buildings themselves and the space they occupy.”

Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Annex

Guardian Life Insurance Company of America AnnexThe Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Annex facade on East 18th Street.

The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America Annex, at 108-116 East 18th Street and 105-117 East 17th Street, is a modernist, 77,000-square-foot, four-story structure that runs the width of a whole city block, from north to south, just east of the 1911 neo-Classical style Guardian Life building at 17th Street and Park Avenue South. (That earlier structure is already a landmark.)

Skidmore, Owings & Merrill designed the annex in the International Style, with anodized aluminum panels and tinted glass windows. The annex, completed in 1963, was modeled after the firm’s Pepsi-Cola Building (1960) on Park Avenue.

Mr. Tierney said the building reflected the achievements of European Modernism. “The crisp curtain walls and large, almost square, plate glass windows on the north and south sides of the building bear the influence of Ludwig Mies van der Rohe,” he said. “Its scale and understated style also show enormous respect for its nearby, low-rise residential neighbors at Gramercy Park.”

Guardian Life was founded in 1860 as Germania Life, but the name was abandoned in 1917 amid the anti-German sentiment during World War I. The company occupied the tower and annex until 1999, when it moved to Lower Manhattan; both buildings were bought by the Related Companies. The tower is now a hotel, but the annex continues to serve as office space.

Morris B. Sanders Studio and Apartment

Morris B. Sanders Studio & Apartment
The Morris B. Sanders Studio and Apartment, at 219 East 49th Street.

The Morris B. Sanders Studio and Apartment is a 5½-story, dark-blue-glazed and vacuum-glass brick building at 219 East 49th Street, between Second and Third Avenues. Completed in 1935, it was the Arkansas-born architect’s home and office and one of the city’s first structures to reflect the Modernist principles of Le Corbusier and others, with its absence of ornamentation, its use of industrial materials, and its bold colors.

Town houses of the time were generally were designed in variants of the classical style, with elaborate porticos and cornices, Mr. Tierney noted.

Sanders, a Yale alumnus who studied cabinet making, was known for his designs of interiors, ceramics, lighting and furniture. His design for the house was most likely influenced by his fellow architect William Lescaze, whose 1934 alteration of his home and office at 211 East 48th Street is considered the city’s first modern structure, according to the commission.

Sanders died in the house in 1948. It was sold a year later, and remains a private residence.

Pratt Institute Building

Pratt Institute BuildingThe Pratt Institute Building, at 144 West 14th Street.

Completed in 1896, the Pratt Institute building at 144 West 14th Street, between Fifth Avenue and Avenue of the Americas, is a Renaissance Revival-style, seven-story loft building with a facade of limestone, tan brick and terra cotta. It was commissioned by real estate developer and philanthropist Joseph Buttenwieser and designed by the architectural firm of Brunner & Tryon, which designed synagogues and other Jewish institutions in New York City.

The big array of tenants who’ve used the buildings over the years include R. H. Macy’s, which made flags and silk underwear there; the silversmith Graff, Washbourne & Dunn; and Epiphone, a stringed instrument maker. It was where the jazz guitarist Les Paul assembled the first “solid body” electric guitar, the model for today’s electric guitars, in 1941.

Pratt, based in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn, acquired the building in 1999 and has used it as its Manhattan campus since 2001, after an extensive restoration by Ehrenkrantz, Eckstut & Architects.

Baumann Brothers Furniture and Carpets Store

New School/Baumann Brothers Furniture and Carpets StoreThe New School/Baumann Brothers Furniture and Carpets Store, at 22-26 East 14th Street.

The Scottish textile merchant James McCreery commissioned D. & J. Jardine, one of the city’s most prominent architectural firms in the late 19th century, to design the through-block, five-story, timber-and-iron-framed building, with a full cast-iron facade that incorporated ornamental influences from the neoclassical, neo-Grec and Queen Anne styles. It was completed in 1881.

The Jardine brothers, David and John, also of Scottish ancestry, designed the former B. Altman & Company Building at 625-629 Sixth Avenue, as well as many warehouses, office buildings, religious structures and apartment buildings.

Baumann, a furniture and home furnishings manufacturer, occupied the building at 22-26 East 14th Street until 1897. The ground floor was then used by a number of 5-, 10- and 25-cent stores, beginning in 1900 with Woolworth’s and ending with McCrory’s, which left in the late 1970s. The upper floors were leased to makers of girdles, garters, trousers and boxing gloves. The building also housed a gym for the Delehanty Institute, which trained Police Department and Fire Department candidates.

The New School acquired the upper stories of the building in 1979 to serve as an annex to what is now Parsons the New School for Design. The ground floor remains in commercial use.

Red Hook Play Center and Pool

Red Hook poolThe Red Hook Play Center & Pool (Sol Goldman Recreation Center and Pool), at 155 Bay Street in Red Hook, Brooklyn.

Wedged on a landfill along the waterfront between the Red Hook Houses, the Henry Street Slip and the Gowanus Canal, the pool was one of 11 that opened in the summer of 1936 under Mayor Fiorello H. La Guardia and the parks commissioner, Mr. Moses, with financing from the federal Works Progress Administration.

The Red Hook pool, the last to open in 1936, is the 10th and last to receive landmark status by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.

The Art Moderne-style pool, 330 feet long by 130 feet wide, opened on Aug. 17, 1936, and held more than 4,400 swimmers. In the shape of a long, low C, the pool features horizontal bands of windows, long cast-stone sills and segmental arch openings. It was renamed in 1986 for Sol Goldman, a Brooklyn-born real estate executive who helped to finance the renovations of the Moses pools.

Fire Engine Company No. 54

Engine Company No. 54
Engine Company No. 54, at 304 West 47th Street.

A four-story, Romanesque Revival-style structure completed in 1888, the firehouse is one of 42 designed for the Fire Department by the architectural firm Napoleon LeBrun & Sons from 1879 to 1895.

The facade — with a cast-iron base, a wide entrance, terra cotta decorative details like sunflowers and sunbursts, and a pair of small pediments supported by corbelled brick brackets — is nearly identical to the former Engine Company No. 53 firehouse at 175 East 104th Street in East Harlem, which received landmark status on Sept. 16.

The Puerto Rican Traveling Theater, founded in 1967, converted the building to a 194-seat auditorium in the late 1970s.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Those towers are an eyesore: Typical urban-renewal-wasteland.

I can only assume this was a mistake. Surely the board meant to require — rather than forbid — the destruction of University Village.

Actually, this just shows why NYC can’t govern itself. The idea of preserving truly excellent and important buildings is a good one, but the city just can’t execute good ideas intelligently.

Instead, it landmarks pretty much every building that’s more than six months old, preventing even ugly buildings from being torn down and — worse — helping to make it so hard to build in New York that housing is unaffordable.

Other than perhaps the Sanders Studio, not one of these buildings is unique or particularly noteworthy, despite Mr. Tierny’s pretentious statements. “The configuration, style and park-like setting of the towers create an undeniable tension between the buildings themselves and the space they occupy.” Indeed!

I find this so strange that I.M. Pei would design these towers. But at the same time, he is the guy who designed the Bank of China building in Hong Kong….

//www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/china/pictures/bank%20of%20china-hong%20kong.jpg

Other than the Red Hook Play Center and Pool, they’re all in Manhattan. There are plenty of buildings that are just as worthy of landmark designation that get ignored because they aren’t in Manhattan.

I wonder if the New York Times could develop a portfolio of “all” the churches that exist in Brooklyn N.Y. N.Y. Starting with the oldest to the newest, also in religous order. I being a catholic would be interested in the catholic architecture of its churches. Can you look into it?
//www.captaindemocracy.wordpress.com

Forget the Landmarks & Preservation Committee. I don’t get why St. Vincents had to beg to redevelop what is rightfully its own. Yes the O’Toole Building is interesting, but what if developers start shying away from cool architecture so as to avoid Landmark designation in 50 years? It’s far fetched, but not unbelievable, as landmarking is out of control in this city and just another political weapon. Could you see Tishman Speyer avoiding landmark status for something that no one else could avoid? I could.

Loss of neighborhoods is an issue, but this is also the fastest paced city in the country and one of the fastest in the world. Time to let it go. What’s the status with landmarking all of West End Avenue? Talk about a joke that only people that already live there want (what about the rest of us?)…

If they wanted to pick a Pei building, why not Kips Bay? Much more attractive.

Those I.M. Pei towers look like a dozen other ones he designed around the same time (mid-60s).

This type of design has not worn well with age. I’m curious as to why they deserve “landmark” status — unless there are tax benefits to the owners.

It is really great to see that the Landmarks Preservation Commission is begining to seriously address modernism as a historic style that requires attention. The Pei buildings are great; but more to the point they represent an era of important architectural and planning ideas, long neglected by preservationists.

This is a sad joke. While the LPC goes around giving its stamp of approval to the Silver Towers and the other Modernist eyesores above, bankrupt developer Harry Macklowe is getting ready to tear down beautiful 19th-century townhouses on 57th Street after destroying the beautiful (and actually historic and landmark-worthy) neighboring Drake Hotel; tracts of brownstone Harlem are being ripped down for lifeless, cheap condos and the Monian Group is gutting the classic “Newsweek” building off Columbus Circle, headquarters of GM at its outset, to turn it into another generic, faceless glass cube.

Where are the LPC’s priorities? Who is it afraid of? Whose warped agenda is it carrying out? Certainly not that of the people who actually live in this city — or of the people who are drawn to it for those sorts of beautiful buildings. Alienating residents and tourists alike for the sake of a few local developers is the pathetic calling of Tierney’s LPC.

what was the point of these designations since the commission overturns its decisions anyway? they just did it for the o’toole building. what is the point of these meaningless designations …

The more buildings get landmarked, the less useless new cheaply made prefab glass eyesores get put up by developers who don’t give a damn about what New York City looks and feels like. Landmark em all, landmark my building, landmark away…it’s our last defense against greed.

So, let me get this straight. NYU supported the landmarking of the ugly buildings they own, but opposed the landmarking of the Edgar Allan Poe house, which they destroyed…

The Silver towers are, frankly, ugly. They don’t negotiate the relationship between street and building particularly effectively. There is ample unused space in between them that amounts to a dead park. They don’t communitcate with passerby on the street. They stand stark, cold and alone. Not the kind of buildings I want in my city.

Every year the Landmark Preservation Committee announces its sites to be landmark, the majority of the buildings are in Manhattan. What about Queens or the Bronx! There are some interesting buildings in the boroughs that deserve recognition. New York City is more than just one borough.

Communist bloc style

May the angry spirit of Jane Jacobs haunt the Landmarks Preservation Commission for their absurd selection of Silver Towers.

I agree with the above comments that it must be some sort of sad mistake to have the Silver Towers so designated.

I’d also agree with the eyesore comment except they are so nondescript that it’s hard to get that excited about them.

midtown man and mad November 18, 2008 · 6:10 pm

I agree with #11. Why waste everyone’s time with Silver Towers. it was not going anywhere, there was no danger of its demolition.

Meanwhile, Macklowe is ready to tear down the last remaining elegant East 57th street townhouses after destroying the beautiful (and tall!) Drake Hotel. Is there no stopping this man?

There are also doomed townhouses on west 55th and west 56th between 5th and 6th – when they are gone, that will be the end of any lowrises in midtown and references to the past.

What is Tierney’s agenda? Why does Ms Huxtable or Ms. Burdin (or anyone ) speak up?

While the adjective could apply in this case, the correct term for what you describe as a “sheer” wall is actually “shear” wall. These blank concrete walls, which run the height of the tower, are named for their structural function: to resist the lateral (or “shear”) forces caused by wind and potential seismic movement.

Modernist architecture of the 60s is out of favor now so it is a good idea to get rid of all those ugly buildings. In fifty more years people will want to know who those knuckleheads were who let these “great buildings” be torn down. Can anyone think of a time in New York when this was not the case?

Part of the consideration for the Pei towers has to have been the preservation of the open space and the classic “towers in a park” grouping. Developers are simply too greedy and tasteless to want to acheive something so excellent nowadays.
The space between and around these towers is a big part of what makes them what they are. Sorry folks- but indeed they do deserve to be protected.

The Silver Towers are beautiful from the inside, but perhaps not the other way around. I find them forbidding upon approach. Yet how could that beauty be made public? Since most of their units house NYU staff and they are owned by NYU, then it’s clear the motivation for having them preserved comes with baggage more unsightly than the concrete blow-up of a Picasso.

I will say this for Silver Towers…

Until a few years ago I lived in a 6th-floor walkup apartment in a former factory building on the southeast corner of Houston and Thompson Streets. I spent many a warm evening perched on my kitchen fire escape, and the three Silver Towers dominated the foreground of the cityscape facing east down Houston Street. One of my favorite things to do, once darkness fell, was to let my eyes go soft and unfocused to take in every side of the towers in my field of vision, and watch — for long minutes at a time — the light show that played out as individual squares lit up and darkened within that huge grid of windows… a human reminder of the thousands of individual lives being lived inside those otherwise anonymous towers.

I’m not sure the exercise would have had the same poignancy against a background less plain, even monolithic, than the towers’ facades.