Assessing the occurrence of elaborative inferences: Lexical decision versus naming

https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90064-2Get rights and content

Abstract

This research extends previous attempts (e.g., G. McKoon & R. Ratcliff, 1986, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 82–91; M. Singer & F. Ferreira, 1983, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 437–448) to determine whether subjects infer highly likely consequences of an event while reading. For example, if subjects read about someone falling off a 14th story roof, will they infer that the person died? The present experiments differ from previous research in that they use procedures—lexical decision and word naming—which we feel permit a clearer assessment of whether the inference occurred at encoding, they directly compare the effects of requiring versus not requiring the inference for coherence in the absence of the usual confounds with semantic relatedness, and they examine the effects that disconfirming evidence has on the activation level of the inferred concept. The lexical decision task appeared to indicate that subjects do, indeed, infer the likely consequences of events while reading. However, the naming task suggested that such inferences were not drawn. We conclude that such inferences are not drawn while reading and that the lexical decision results, as well as previous results using a recognition task, reflect context checking that occurs at the time of the test.

References (32)

  • N.E. Sharkey et al.

    What is the point of integration? The loci of knowledge-based facilitation in sentence processing

    Journal of Memory and Language

    (1987)
  • M. Singer et al.

    Inferring consequences in story comprehension

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1983)
  • D.A. Balota et al.

    Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word-frequency in the neglected decision stage

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1984)
  • D.A. Balota et al.

    Depth of automatic spreading activation: Mediated priming effects in pronunciation but not in lexical decision

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition

    (1986)
  • P.A. Carpenter et al.

    Reading comprehension as the eyes see it

  • F. Chang

    Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension

    Memory and Cognition

    (1980)
  • Cited by (182)

    • Capturing spontaneous trait inference with the modified free association paradigm

      2017, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other words, activation measures rely on superficial processing of the material, and thus might be less sensitive to STI. Moreover, some activation measures like the naming task and the lexical decision task rely on very fast responses and, for that reason, floor effects might be more frequent than in memory measures (Potts et al., 1988). In the present paper, we introduced a new paradigm, the Modified Free Association Paradigm (MFAP), a conceptually-driven measure.

    • Memory for Text and Discourse: Retrieval and Comprehension

      2017, Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant BNS-8409272 to George Potts.

    View full text