| Descript |
1 online resource |
| Content type |
text |
| Media type |
computer |
| Carrier type |
online resource |
| Descript |
text file PDF rda |
|
Electronic book. |
| Series |
Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion |
| Contents |
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Note on transliteration -- Introduction -- Part I. Legal Pluralism in Late Antiquity and Classical Islam: Survey and Analysis -- Chapter 1. A Late Antique Legacy of Legal Pluralism -- Chapter 2. Islam's Judicial Bazaar -- Part II. The Judicial Choices of Christians and Jews in the Early Islamic Period: A Comparative Analysis -- Introduction -- Christian and Jewish Communal Organizations after the Islamic Conquest -- Ecclesiastical and Rabbanite Leaders and Legal Pluralism in the Early Islamic Period -- Chapter 3. Eastern Christian Judicial Authorities in the Early Islamic Period -- Chapter 4. Rabbanite Judicial Authorities in the Late Geonic Period -- Chapter 5. Christian Recourse to Nonecclesiastical Judicial Institutions -- Chapter 6. Jewish Recourse to Islamic Courts -- Conclusion -- Abbreviations -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- Acknowledgments |
| Summary |
In A Common Justice Uriel I. Simonsohn examines the legislative response of Christian and Jewish religious elites to the problem posed by the appeal of their coreligionists to judicial authorities outside their communities. Focusing on the late seventh to early eleventh centuries in the region between Iraq in the east and present-day Tunisia in the west, Simonsohn explores the multiplicity of judicial systems that coexisted under early Islam to reveal a complex array of social obligations that connected individuals across confessional boundaries. By examining the incentives for appeal to external judicial institutions on the one hand and the response of minority confessional elites on the other, the study fundamentally alters our conception of the social history of the Near East in the early Islamic period.Contrary to the prevalent scholarly notion of a rigid social setting strictly demarcated along confessional lines, Simonsohn's comparative study of Christian and Jewish legal behavior under early Muslim rule exposes a considerable degree of fluidity across communal boundaries. This seeming disregard for religious affiliations threatened to undermine the position of traditional religious elites; in response, they acted vigorously to reinforce communal boundaries, censuring recourse to external judicial institutions and even threatening transgressors with excommunication. |
| Note |
Mode of access: Internet via World Wide Web. |
|
In English. |
|
Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 08. Jul 2019) |
|
Available through DeGruyter. |
| Access |
University staff and students only. Requires University Computer Account login on and off-campus. |
| Note |
Mode of access: World Wide Web. |
| Subject |
Conflict of laws (Canon law)
|
|
Conflict of laws (Canon law).
|
|
Conflict of laws (Islamic law) -- Middle East -- History.
|
|
Conflict of laws (Jewish law)
|
|
Conflict of laws (Jewish law).
|
|
Conflict of laws -- Jurisdiction -- Middle East -- History.
|
|
Conflict of laws -- Middle East -- History.
|
|
Legal polycentricity -- Middle East -- History.
|
| Add Author |
DeGruyter.
|
| Related To |
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Penn Press eBook Package Complete Collection 9783110413458
|
|
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Penn Press eBook Package Religion 9783110413588
|
|
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter Penn eBook Package Backlist 2000-2013 9783110459548
|
|
Title is part of eBook package: De Gruyter UPP eBook-Package Backlist 2000-2015 9783110667561
|
| ISBN |
9780812205060 electronic bk. |
| ISBN/ISSN |
10.9783/9780812205060 |
|
