Template talk:Cc-by-sa-layout
Template:Cc-by-sa-layout has been protected indefinitely because it is a highly-used or visible template. Use {{Edit request}} on this page to request an edit.Please test any changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in a user subpage, and consider discussing changes at the talk page before implementing them. |
PDF edit
see w:Help:Books/Feedback#Image_credits_should_use_attribution_and_credit_line. Docu at 14:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- How is this relevant to this template? Multichill (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
- The attribution done through these templates is currently not supported by Wikipedia's PDF export/book function. Docu at 19:20, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Hardcoded deed.en? edit
The licensetpl_link
field always contains an URL to the English license deed, even when the template is displayed in a different language (for which there is a translated version on creativecommons.org), see e.g. [1]. I guess we cannot use just {{int:lang}}
, since the list of languages supported on creativecommons.org is much narrower than on Commons, but we should add a parameter (say, deedlanguage
) with a default of the current “en”. --Mormegil (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- That's only machine code. The user gets a link to the translated version (if available). In your example I end up at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/cz/deed.cs . Multichill (talk) 08:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- What does it mean “only machine code”, and who is “the user”? Maybe we should clearly define what should the
licensetpl_link
field contain and what could it be used for. The license URL to be used in metadata is (I believe) without the “deed.en” part at all. Thelicensetpl_link
field is currently used by the stockphoto gadget to construct attribution, where proper deed.xx might be in place. See e.g. [2], click “Použít soubor” and you’ll get the nonsensical “deed.en” there. --Mormegil (talk) 11:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- What does it mean “only machine code”, and who is “the user”? Maybe we should clearly define what should the
Proposed change for licensetpl_link edit
Please see this proposal. /skagedaltalk 20:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Edit request edit
{{Editprotected}} Remove the |link=
from the file links to provide attribution as required by their licenses by enabling linking. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 16:38, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not done it's {{PD-ineligible}} and linking is very confusing in the interface.
Edit request for SA icon edit
Could the [[Image:Cc-sa.svg]]
in the template be changed to [[Image:Cc-sa white.svg]]
? For wikis that have non-white backgrounds and use InstantCommons, CC-BY-SA templates display the ShareAlike icon with a transparent background. The white-background version of the Attribution icon is used, so it would probably be better to make the ShareAlike icon use the white background as well. Thanks, RAN1 (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Wrong short name edit
{{Editprotected}} The "licensetpl_short" abreviation is wrong. It should be "CC BY-SA X.0" not "CC-BY-SA-X.0" per e.g. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en.
The same also applies to {{Cc-by-layout}}. /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 08:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- @Fabrice Florin (WMF): since this might affect the MultimediaViewer (since the change would show up in CommonsMetadata). /André Costa (WMSE) (talk) 08:51, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Please confirm first that nothing explodes. Multichill (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Edit request: Heavily used template edit
{{Edit request}}
Please add <noinclude>{{heavily used template}}</noinclude>
to the top of this high use template (example). Riley Huntley (talk) 08:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- Done--Jarekt (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)