RAF Ensign edit

I did indeed have a reason for choosing the colours of the RAF Ensign. The reason is Graham Bartram's website. He works for the MOD designing flags and his website is where I got the colours for the RAF Ensign from. See here [1] David Newton 16:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Mil Mi 24D cannon.jpg edit

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Isitt NEW ZEALAND 1945.jpg edit

I don't see a problem with the documentary support for this Commons image; nor do I understand how you can construe a problem in a context in which a readily accessible explanation is specific. If I have misunderstood or if I need to re-write a sentence or two in order to withstand close scrutiny, I will do whatever is necessary. However, I repeat -- I do not perceive any reason to edit this page. --Ooperhoofd (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Samuelarrival.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Samuelarrival.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

88.217.57.85 07:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image:Sir_Geoffrey_Salmond.jpg edit

Image deletion warning Image:Sir_Geoffrey_Salmond.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans  Bahasa Indonesia  bosanski  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  eesti  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  hrvatski  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  occitan  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  shqip  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  조선말  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  עברית  العربية  پښتو  فارسی  ދިވެހިބަސް  +/−

h-stt !? 07:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please link images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello Greenshed!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Flyvevåbnet-OF4.svg edit

Hi! I used one of your files to make this. Just letting you know. --MGA73 (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Signature Request edit

  Is this okay? Connormah (talk) 01:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Anytime. Connormah (talk) 01:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copyright Query - FOLLOW UP edit

Dear Greenshed,

We have attempted to contact you regarding Parthenon’s right to use the George V in the uniform of a Marshal of the RAF.jpg as part of our documentary series entitled Mystery Files (and any subsequent reversions) as outlined in our previous emails below.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_V_in_the_uniform_of_a_Marshal_of_the_RAF.jpg

It is imperative that we have authority from the copyright holder for the use of this archive material and in consideration of that authority, we would be able to pay the copyright holder a nominal fee upon signature of a release form.

The transmission of this series is due to commence shortly and I would be most grateful if you could respond to this email as a matter of urgency to enable us to put in place the necessary documentation.

Kind regards

Emily Rudge

emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com 0044 1923 286 886

Copyright Query - FOLLOW UP edit

Dear Greenshed,

It seems that my previous email did not reach you. We were enquiring about that image as we would like to use it within our documnetary. However, the Crown Copyright will not confirm to me that it is under their copyright and says that it may fall under an individual author/photographer or a gallery.

Do you have any idea where you got this image from and who may hold the copyright to this image?

Many thanks and I look forward to hearing from you.

Emily Rudge,

emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com

Emily.
I replied to your first question on my Wikipedia talk page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Greenshed). I imagine that the reason why any email you have sent me did not reach me was because I have not made my email address available to you. I do not like to respond to wiki questions using email and prefer to use the wiki where the question was asked.
I believe that the image is Crown Copyright and as it is over 50 years old it may be freely reused. My basis for saying that it is Crown Copyright is given in the image description for http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:George_V_in_the_uniform_of_a_Marshal_of_the_RAF.jpg. This states that "The uncropped photograph was scanned from Finn, C. J. et al (2004). Air Publication 3003. HMSO. The entire publication, including its photographs, was issued under Crown Copyright. Although copyright for the publication is dated at 2004, the Crown Copyright on the photographs starts from the date when they were taken. King George died in 1936 and so this photograph is more than 50 years old, placing it in the public domain." In general you may wish to look at http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikipedia-l/2005-May/022055.html and Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia. I hope this helps. Greenshed (talk) 19:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:Massacre_de_Malmedy_23-0224a-1-.gif edit

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Massacre_de_Malmedy_23-0224a-1-.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 07:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Temporary_statue_of_Air-Vice_Marshal_K_R_Park_on_the_fourth_plinth.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Cheers, Truth's Out There (speak the truth) 09:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Aberlemno II Image- copyright query edit

Hi Greenshed,

My name is Amber Comerford and I work for Tern Digital in Glasgow. We are currently making an educational installation project about the history of Edinburgh to be housed in the Edinburgh Museum and was hoping to get some information on using your image of the Aberlemno II stone.

I have seen the licence and I believe that says that you created the image- eg took the photograph, but I would like to try and confirm that in writing that you own the copyright for the image and are happy for us to reproduce it in our project.

It would be great if you were happy to drop me an email about this if that was ok, as I would then be able to use is an official record of our conversations. My email address is amber.comerford@terntv.com

Thanks very much for your help, I look forward to hearing from you.

With best wishes,

Amber

Tern Digital

T: 0141 241 6075

File:IndyCar Las Vegas 2011 big crash.jpg edit

Sorry, but I upload full resolution version file that has watermark, can you delete it again?--Sasha Krotov (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Naming edit

re "File:Trenchard in conversation with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon.jpg"

  • At the time of this photo, Elizabeth was no longer known as "Bowes-Lyon". She was known as Queen Elizabeth.
  • It is usual to give the name of the person of highest standing first :Queen Elizabeth and (Officer or Forename) Trenchard. Unless there are numerous figures to be named, and they are lined up for a photo.
  • "In conversation with" is superfluous. If something significant was happening e.g. awarding him an honour, or the location is known, e.g. Wellington Barracks, then it needs a mention.

Would you mind renaming it, and any others that are similar? Amandajm (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

If you want to rename it then by all means do so. Greenshed (talk) 00:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Colerne edit

Hi Greenshed, are you sure File:Colerne Parish Church.jpg is in Colerne, and if so is there any chance it is a Colerne other than in Wiltshire? WereSpielChequers (talk) 18:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

hello edit

File:Conferencia de Yalta.jpg My name is axel scoppa, and i need something..
i want you use, this photo in the yalta conferece file.
Aaxxellssccooppaa. (talk) 02:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ghouston (talk) 10:46, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Diem dead.jpg edit

 
File:Diem dead.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nguyen1310 (talk) 04:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:A-4C Tte casco.jpg edit

 
File:A-4C Tte casco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

LGA talkedits 02:34, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
File:The Duke of Kent shakes hands with a BOAC pilot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

PatHadley (talk) 13:41, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Earth 2015 edit

Hello,

You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia).
The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end.
A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event.
  See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c)

  For more details |   Contact

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:39, 3 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer edit

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 14:01, 23 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your VFC installation method is deprecated edit

Hello Greenshed, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling - 01.png edit

 
File:Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling - 01.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(talk) 10:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Censored postcard edit

Do you have the obverse of this postcard File:Daily Mail Postcard - Sir D Haig introducing Sir Pertab Singh to General Joffre.jpg? If so please upload it and add it tot he category Category:Censored covers. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 14:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Air Marshal Shiri salutes President Emmerson Mnangagwa at his inauguration.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: video is a reupload of copyrighted broadcast under CC
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Yeenosaurus (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Leigh Light U-boat image edit

Hi. I would like to know more about the image of the Leigh Light in use that you posted on Wiki. I have seen it in Coastal Command Review but That makes no mention of the Leigh Light and the picture seems inconsistent with a single light source. Could the lines of light be rockets? I have other questions as well. WATUWIKI (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply