Nicolas Perrault III

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nicolas M. Perrault!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Fontaine, cheval, copyright

Bonjour.
Sois rassuré, la loi française protège les oeuvres avant qu'elles ne soient versées dans le domaine public "seulement" soixante dix ans après la mort de leur auteur. Frémiet étant mort en 1910, c'est tout bon. Ceci posé, je te le dis, soixante dix ans c'est drôlement long !! J'ai détruit de nombreuses photos de sculptures parisiennes rien que pour ça et ça me rend furieux ! J'ai aussi quelques images en réserves d'oeuvres d'auteurs morts en 1940 et j'attends le premier janvier prochain avec impatience, crois-moi. Mais au moins, pour ce cheval-là, je suis sûr de moi ! Tu peux donc apporter ton soutien à cette magnifique image l'esprit libre ;) ! Amicalement depuis Paris,--Jebulon (talk) 22:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Allo!

Merci de ta reponse! Ca me fera plaisir de donner mon support a ta photo, car elle est tres bien reussie! Au Quebec, c'est "seulement" cinquante ans. C'est long aussi, mais je ne sais pas s'il y a une loi contre la photographie de sculpture. Amicalement de Montreal, Nicolas M. Perrault (talk) 23:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freezing Rain on Tree Branch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Berthold Werner 12:23, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Khao Sok National Park View.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 10:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you, for encouraging me to nominate my bugs! V-wolf (talk) 20:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Great Wall of China July 2006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --King of Hearts 09:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your flower from South Africa

Try it at de:WP:RBIO/B. I'm sure they can help :-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:48, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

• Thanks! I've posted this flower on the french page Jebulon mentionned (because I speak french!) I'll keep you posted on what happened.
  • Its from the genus of Gazania. We couldn't get a hold of the exact species though.

ou bien ici :[[1]], c'est en français !!--Jebulon (talk) 15:08, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

• Merci pour ta précision! J'ai posé la question!

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Nicolas Perrault III!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

• Image:Nicolas Perrot.png was uncategorized on 5 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nicolas Perrot.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nicolas Perrot.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Werieth (talk) 13:51, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Muraille de Chine

Ton image est bonne mais il est difficile de réduire la muraille a une seule image. Si tu rajoute au scope "vue de Mutianyu" sa serait parfait. Bon souvenir de Toulouse --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Petit bug avec la nomination. Il suffit de changer le scope comme çà Great Wall of China at Mutianyu et s'est plus simple, il n'y a pas eu de vote pour le moment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

D'accord, je vais tenter d'arranger ça et merci, c'est bien gentil!

-- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 17:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Je ne suis pas certain de comprendre pourquoi il faut écrire [[:category:Great Wall of China|Great Wall of China at Mutianyu]] puisque la catégorie existe bel et bien. Saurais-tu m'y éclairer? Merci encore :) -- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 17:08, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

C'est très simple: j'ai fais une faute de frappe en la cherchant et je ne me suis pas aperçu quelle existait. Désolé Par contre il y a un bug dans la page tu as du mal fermer une parenthèse --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Haha, d'accord! J'ai changé quelques trucs sur la page de code de la nomination et le problème semble être réglé. Merci de ton aide! -- Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Wall of China.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

---

Scope changed from Great Wall of China to Great Wall of China at Mutianyu --Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 00:37, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

 Support Good with new scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:22, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Antoni Gutierrez Diaz.png/2

Hi Nicolas, I've read your comment in the candidate page and, of course without questioning it, I'd like to understand it :-) Is there a policy, guideline or whatever about "biopics"? Best regards and many thanks in advance --Ecemaml ^{talk to me/habla conmigo} 09:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Muslim Americans.png

Hello. An editor on en.wiki has pointed out that Shaquille O'Neal is not a Muslim. Could you remove him from the image? Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 20:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Map Francophone World

Salut,
Alors, vas là: [[2]] et change premièrement le Québec et le Noveau Brusnwick dans une couleur plus claire analogique au français dans les provinces hors Québec et Nouveau Brunswick; et deuxièmement, tire le bleu foncé de tous les territoires dans le Nord et de l'Alaska - au minimum. Sinon, ce n'est que de l'anglo-propagande (d'ailleurs, tu fais des fautes dans ton anglais que cela se voit que ce n'est pas ta langue maternelle...)
PS: Eh ouais, aucune source pour rien... 2.242.113.117 07:10, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

• Vouvoyez-moi et changez de ton s'il-vous-plaît. Je n'ai pas la prétention d'être anglophone. Je préfère contribuer en anglais seulement parce que je trouve les wikipédiens anglophones plus polis. Je ne me sens d'ailleurs pas contraint à éditer une autre image pour remettre l'anglais à sa place. Faites si ça vous chante. Je remarque seulement que la résolution de la carte francophone est plus élevée que la carte anglophone. La carte anglophone ne colore que les pays. Il est absurde de colorer des régions du Nouveau-Brunswick et de colorer le Québec tout entier.

Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 12:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

File renaming template

The renaming template is: {{rename|new name|number of renaming Criterion|verbal explanation}}
Number of Criterion you can find on the Commons:File_renaming site. When you are an uploader, the best is Criterion #1, uploaders have special favours ;-)
Good luck! Wieralee (talk) 16:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Australopithecus sediba.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:One right foot.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:One right foot.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, JuTa 06:52, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

"cancelling perspective"

You made a row of perspective "cancelling" in fossil photographs. Perspective transformation cannot be cancelled for skull photographs, a photograph could approach an isometric view at few meters of distance at least, but the hidden features at close distance cannot be reinvented by changing the image, without you even knowing the angle at which it is taken. Also some fossils have special deformations or custom shapes that give them a look you may not feel comfortable with, and without knowing that shot angle, you have no way to know if you're "correcting" the photograph angle or actually the real skull shape. I'm talking of examples like Arago21, or the very close photo of Miguelon (Atapuerca). That's messing raw information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by UtaUtaNapishtim (talk • contribs) 22:20, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for dropping by. Good point, but angled images, in my opinion, do more damage to the encyclopedia by looking botched than transformed (not "corrected") images. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The original photographs do more damage than your personal feeling of what they should look like ? That's fine if you recognize it's your opinion. In this case it is better to create a separate image where you mention clearly that you introduce free, personal, artistical modifications to an original image, so people can appreciate that modification themselves and pick between the two, and readers would understand that there is another version. The images of the fossils I've mentionned above, really look like different fossils after your modifications. This is not a tiny problem, because publications in nature/PNAS/Elsevier-linked journals cannot be reproduced, most pictures of Spain fossils are made by a professional photographer who lives on the licensing of his pictures... so theoritically teachers and professors only have wikipedia images left, provided by independent contributors who take the photos as they can in museums. So they may not feel like the best shots in the world but they are the one we find on google and that are the most reproduced in the end. If you create a different shape on your own feelings, you modify raw data that is used to communicate and teach. Arago 21 has nearly no prognathism after your modification for example. The low-angle close-up shot of Miguelon turns into a front view after your modification. I have not checked all your other modifications, but that's not much a scientific behaviour and again you have no clue to base your modifications on. -- UtaUtaNapishtim (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

A comment aside as well, it's cool when images are minified :) Wikipedia looks free but actually it's not, people pay for other people : the images you modified were few hundreds of Ko, your modifications were >1Mo with sometimes a bigger resolution. You can use tools like tinypng.com to reduce the size of your uploads. -- UtaUtaNapishtim (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Venezuela inflation

Hi! Sorry for bothering, I just wanted to tell that currently a USD is now worth more than 200,000 bolívares and I wanted to ask if it was possible to update the image. Many thanks in advance! --Jamez42 (talk) 23:08, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Ok will do. Thanks for dropping by. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 00:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello! I was updating the inflation graphs for Venezuela until I saw your work. Can you provide an update? Also, in one of your files, the words "Chart Area" from your cursor is still visible. Anyways, thanks for your graphs, they are very detailed!--ZiaLater (talk) 07:52, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Oh, and the bolívar fuerte is pushing 1,000,000 per USD.--ZiaLater (talk) 07:53, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

@ZiaLater: Hi and thanks for dropping by. Happy to read you like the graphs. I'll correct the graphic error as soon as I can (good eye for spotting that), but I was planning on waiting for it to reach 1,000,000 to the USD before updating. That way I can update the vertical lines at the same time. Cheers Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 08:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)

Done. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png

As of June 2018, XE.com is still referring to the nonexistent or outdated DIPRO exchange rate. Switch to other references, such as the Central Bank of Venezuela to see the DICOM exchange rate. Look under the DICOM column: FX for first quarter 2018, FX for second quarter 2018. You should see a huge spike on the official rate after February 2018. Eyesnore (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

One thing is that XE stopped updating their information for the Venezuelan currency. As a result, the notion that the Venezuelan bolívar has two official exchange rates is invalid after February 2018 because it was eliminated by the central bank and the Venezuelan government. The sole exchange rate for the Venezuelan bolívar is the DICOM auction rate. Eyesnore (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

@Eyesnore: Got it, I couldn't find the info in the files you attached, but I got them from here: Tipo de cambio. I updated the image. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 17:50, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Interested in talking about Venezuela inflation

Hi, Nicolas.

My name's Chris Alcantara, and I'm a reporter with The Washington Post.

I am working on a story about the ongoing crisis in Venezuela and found your graphic showing the value of the USD compared to the Bolivares fuertes.

I am curious to know how you calculated the data and made the chart. Would it be possible to get in touch with me? My email is chris.alcantara@washpost.com.

Thanks for your help, and I look forward to your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriswapo (talk • contribs) 19:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

(Copy of answer sent by email.)

Hi Chris, thanks for getting in touch regarding the Venezuelan Bolivar. I'm a regular reader of the Washington Post and I'll help you with pleasure. I visited Venezuela (Merida, Puerto Ordaz, and Santa Elena de Uairén, March-May 2016) and would like to give you some background details. Hopefully, these will give you an idea of what the numbers on the graph mean to people in Venezuela.

There are two lines on the graph: the black market rate and the official rate. The black market rate is the one on dolartoday.com (one "l" in the word "dolar"). I visited perhaps a dozen black market dollar traders in Venezuela and this was the standard they used. Traders of Merida would visit Caracas with dollars that they got, for example, from tourists, and buy bolivars with those dollars at the rate published on dolartoday (1:1100 for most of my time in the country). Back in Merida, they would then sell those bolivars for US dollars typically at the 1:1000 rate. The ~10% difference in exchange rates between Caracas and elsewhere in Venezuela accounts for the risk the trader takes in visiting the dangerous capital city. The traders had to visit Caracas to buy US dollars often, since they never wanted to sell large numbers of US dollars at once. (The value of the bolivars they received in exchange for US dollars could melt fast.)

The historical black market exchange rates are available on dolartoday: https://dolartoday.com/indicadores . You'll see a graph titled "Dólar libre en Venezuela 2017-2018". Click on it to download the spreadsheet. It goes back to 2010. I attach to this email the modified version of the spreadsheet used to create the graph on Wiki Commons. The version I attach (but not the one on dolartoday.com) includes the official government exchange rate. This is from the Banco Central de Venezuela (BCV): http://www.bcv.org.ve/estadisticas/tipo-de-cambio . Click on the first cell of the second table on that page, the one at the intersection of the line that reads "Tipo de cambio de referencia" (Reference exchange rate) and the column that reads "Diario" (Daily). The BCV spreadsheet covers 2018 only. For earlier dates, I used xe.com, although they seem to have stopped updating the USD:BSF exchange rate.

When I was in Venezuela, nobody seemed to use the government exchange rates to convert US dollars into bolivars. The doors to the official exchange booths at the airport were open and the lights were on, but there was no one at the booth to actually convert the money. I peeked inside to see what rates they offered and two men from outside the booth immediately ran toward me, assuring me that they would give me a twice as many bolivars to the dollar as the booth advertised.

Yet in theory, at least in 2016, it was possible for a Venezuelan to exchange bolivars for US dollars with the government at the hugely advantageous official exchange rates. Find a US dollar on the ground? Exchange it for 1000 bolivars, then exchange those 1000 bolivars at the official exchange rate for 100 US dollars. But in practice, the government would only allow Venezuelans to buy a small number of US dollars when they were planning a trip outside the country.

I must highlight, the legal exchange booth at the airport traded --- or offered to trade, for I have not seen anyone use it --- at the 1:200 or 1:300 rate, not at the 1:10 official rate. There were hence two legal rates and it is untrue that the government expected tourists to buy bolivars at a rate 110 times lower (1:10) than that of the black market (1:1100). User Eyesnore on Wiki Commons tells me on my talk page that this official double standard was abolished in February 2018. Only the equivalent of the 1:200-300 exchange rate, seemingly established by auction, survives.

Don't hesitate if you have questions. I'll gladly read your article. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 02:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png

Inflation is nearly 6 million per 1 USD. Just thought you should know.--ZiaLater (talk) 20:33, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

@ZiaLater: Thanks for the heads up! As you can now see on the image page, the chart is updated every three months (next time 27 September) or whenever the bolivar is worth three times less (next 10,000,000 BsF to 1 USD). I will nevertheless make an exception on Monday August 20th because the country is converting the currency from the Bolivar fuerte to the Bolivar soberano (worth 100,000 more). Regards, Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 14:10, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you, I was going to mention that as well. Will you still include the fuerte as well since they are only removing a few zeros?--ZiaLater (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

@ZiaLater: Yes both the fuerte and the soberano will be on the chart. Two things will change. First, the y-axis will be numbered 10; 100; ... ; 1,000,000 BsF; 100 BsS; 1000 BsS, etc. Second, the fuerte line will remain blue but the soberano line will be of another colour. Cheers and thanks for your interest. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 05:05, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@ZiaLater: All done, hope you like it. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

BCV website down?

No problem! I was able to access the data through Hola VPN. Here is the file (download), in order to update this file. Eyesnore (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Eyesnore: Excellent! Many thanks Eyesnore, I did not know the website was up in Venezuela. I'll update as soon as possible. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Spanish version of File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png

Hi, your file is been use in at least two articles of the Spanish Wikipedia. I was wondering if you can upload an Spanish version of the file? I'II be more than happy to help with the translation, cheers --Oscar_. (talk) 23:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oscar .: Por supuesto, sería un placer :) Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

@Oscar .: Acabo de terminarlo (mira aquí), no dudes en decirme si cometí errores en español. Espero que te guste. Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 19:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

¡Ha quedado excelente! Muchas gracias, --Oscar_. (talk) 22:29, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png requires updating

Hi Nicolas Perrault III,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png is out of date. over 500 now; official rate devalued to 212.69. Could you update it? Thanks again. Eyesnore (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi Eyesnore, thanks for dropping by  Done Nicolas Perrault III (talk) 20:40, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png requires updating

Hi Nicolas Perrault III,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png is out of date. parallel exchange rate is over 1000, official rate is over 700 Could you update it? Thanks again. Eyesnore (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

You said you would update it when it reaches square root of 10 times more value in fixed intervals (100, 300, 1000, 3000, etc.) Eyesnore (talk) 23:51, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

No license for File:Deutschlandlied.ogg

Dear Nicolas,

Your file File:Deutschlandlied.ogg lacks a free license. While the composition is indeed PD, there is no evidence that the recording is. You originally tagged this as only relates to the copyright of the composition without taking the recording into account.

Sound recordings were not eligible for federal copyright protection in the U.S. before 1972; instead, state common-law copyrights protected them; only in 2018, with the passage of the Music Modernization Act, did these older recordings become eligible for federal protection. In any case, somebody else tagged this recording as 1924–1963 without renewal; since it would not have been able to be registered during this period, this does not make sense.

Besides this, Commons policy requires that recordings be out of copyright in their original country as well. Assuming that this recording originates in Germany, there is indeed a fairly good chance that it is from before the 1960s (the oldest protected recordings). In this case, it could potentially be tagged PD-US-Record, leaving its status pending the discussion on that category. To do this, however, you would need to establish the actual dating and source of this recording.

Thanks.

D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 18:28, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Deutschlandlied.ogg

File:Deutschlandlied.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 02:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Preux photographe en terre islandaise.JPG

File:Preux photographe en terre islandaise.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

File:New-Map-Francophone World.PNG

File:New-Map-Francophone World.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Openlydialectic (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

(File:Venezuela_inflation_on_the_black_market_(DolarToday)_on_a_logarithmic_scale.png)

Why is this table is in spanish since June, if there is already exist a spanish version?

If you have free time, can you also update it with a July data?

--81.200.17.28 18:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png requires updating

Hi Nicolas Perrault III,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Venezuela inflation on the black market (DolarToday) on a logarithmic scale.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. NoonIcarus (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2023 (UTC)