Skip to main content

The Case for the Separation of Money and Credit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monetary Policy, Financial Crises, and the Macroeconomy

Abstract

This paper argues that central banks could control consumer price inflation better by injecting money through lump-sum transfers to citizens, rather than by manipulating the credit market and interest rates. Lump-sum monetary transfers lead to less intersectoral distortion and less intertemporal discoordination than measures aimed at stimulating the credit market. They allow central banks to target inflation without building up financial imbalances.

The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Swiss National Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See McLeay et al. (2014) for a description of money creation in the fractional reserve banking system.

  2. 2.

    See Laidler (2004) for a monetarist view on Wicksell and Woodford.

  3. 3.

    Money is defined as the common medium of exchange and consists of currency and currency substitutes in circulation. Currency is defined as outside money, monetary base or central bank money. Currency can be redeemable in precious metal or unredeemable if it is a fiat currency. Currency substitutes are redeemable in currency (claims issued by commercial banks to pay currency on demand) and are a synonym of inside money, monetary aggregates or bank deposits.

  4. 4.

    Note, however, that changes in the stock of currency itself (gold) would not take place through the granting of credit but through the purchase and sale of gold.

  5. 5.

    The controversy between the Banking School and the Currency School also dealt with other issues, such as the equivalence between bank notes and bank deposits or the role of precious metal in the determination of prices. We focus in this paper on the economic consequences of the relationship between money and credit, which remain of the utmost importance in today’s debate.

  6. 6.

    See Ledoit (2011) for a formal model of the Cantillon effect.

  7. 7.

    See Huelsmann (2014) for an essay on the distributive effect of monetary policy.

  8. 8.

    See Bernholz (1993) for a discussion on the reasons for the existence of interest rates in the tradition of Böhm-Bawerk (1889), and Kirzner (1993) for an excellent exposition of the pure time-preference theory of interest.

  9. 9.

    See Chap. 20 on ‘Interest, credit expansion, and the trade cycle’ in Mises (1949), Chap. 4 on ‘Price expectations, monetary disturbances, and malinvestments’ in Hayek (1939), or Chap. 5 on ‘Bank credit expansion and its effects on the economic system’ in Huerta de Soto (2009) for an exposition of the Austrian business cycle theory.

  10. 10.

    The term ‘forced savings’ is used in the sense of Garrison (2004), rather than in that of Hayek (1935).

  11. 11.

    This also allows to understand economically the trade-off between inflation and default.

  12. 12.

    This section is based on Baeriswyl (2015).

  13. 13.

    Note that this withdrawal process would then affect the credit market.

  14. 14.

    Unconventional measures taken by central banks, such as quantitative easing, may share some fiscal aspects because the central bank purchases government bonds or because taxpayer money is put at risk.

References

  • Allais, M. (1999). La Crise Mondiale d’Aujourd’hui: Pour de profondes réformes des institutions financières et monétaires. Paris: Clément Juglar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, J. W. (1935). The 100 per cent reserve plan. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 50(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baeriswyl, R. (2015). Intertemporal discoordination in the 100 percent reserve banking system. Procesos de Mercado: Revista Europea de Economía Política, 12(2), 43–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benes, J., & Kumhof, M. (2013). The Chicago Plan Revisited. IMF mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernholz, P. (1993). The importance of Boehm-Bawerk’s theory of capital and interest from an historical perspective. History of Economic Ideas, 1(2), 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. v. (1889). Capital and interest: Positive theory of capital [Reprint by Libertarian Press, Pennsylvania, 1959], Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantillon, R. (1755). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général [English translation, Ed. Mark Thornton, Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama, US, 2010], London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. (1936). 100% money. New York: Adelphi Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1960). A program for monetary stability. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R. W. (2004). Overconsumption and forced saving in the Mises-Hayek theory of the business cycle. History of Political Economy, 36(2), 323–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1935). Prices and production. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. v. (1939). Profits, interest and investment. London: George Routledge & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huelsmann, J. G. (2014). Fiat money and the distribution of incomes and wealth. In D. Howden & J. T. Salerno (Eds.), The fed at one hundred. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta de Soto, J. (2009). Money, bank credit, and economic cycles. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. M. (1993). The pure time-preference theory of interest: An attempt at clarification. In J. M. Herbener (Ed.), The meaning of Ludwig von Mises: Contributions in economics, sociology, epistemology, and political philosophy. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. (2004). Woodford and Wicksell on Interest and Prices: The Place of the Pure Credit Economy in the Theory of Monetary Policy. EPRI WP University of Western Ontario (2004–2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledoit, O. (2011). The Redistributive Effects of Monetary Policy. University of Zurich Working Paper Series, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeay, M., Radia, A., & Thomas, R. (2014). Money creation in the modern economy. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q1, 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v. (1912). The theory of money and credit [Reprint by Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, 1981], Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. v. (1949). Human action [Reprint by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, 1998].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, M. (1962). Man, economy, and state [Reprint by the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, AL, 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicksell, K. (1898). Interest and prices. London: Macmillan, tr. Richard Kahn (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, M. (2003). Interest and prices: Foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Katrin Assenmacher, Rafael Greminger, Hans-UeliHunziker, Carlos Lenz, Jonas Meuli, Pierre Monnin, Samuel Reynard, participants at the symposium held in honor of Professor Gerhard Illing in Munich, and especially Frank Heinemann, the editor, for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Romain Baeriswyl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baeriswyl, R. (2017). The Case for the Separation of Money and Credit. In: Heinemann, F., Klüh, U., Watzka, S. (eds) Monetary Policy, Financial Crises, and the Macroeconomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56261-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics