Abstract
Chomsky’s (1959) review of Verbal Behavior (Skinner, 1957) has been hailed as the most influential document in the history of psychology. Although many rejoinders to Chomsky’s review have been published, their impact has been minimal. Moreover, Chomsky has not answered them in detail. To invite Chomsky to revisit a number of matters concerning the review, he was interviewed. The principal topics addressed by Chomsky were (a) historical factors associated with behaviorism after World War II; (b) circumstances surrounding the preparation of the review; (c) likely compatibility between formal and functional analyses of language; and (d) Chomsky’s current point of view on aspects of the content of his review and on the evolution of behavior analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andresen, J. (1991). Skinner and Chomsky 30 years later or: The return of the repressed. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 49–60.
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961). The misbehavior of organisms. American Psychologist, 16, 681–684.
Broadbent, D. E. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior . British Journal of Psychology, 50, 371–373.
Chomsky, N. (1959). Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.
Chomsky, N. (1971, December 30). Review of B.F. Skinner’s Beyond Freedom and Dignity. The New York Review of Books, 17, 18–24.
Chomsky, N. (1972). Psychology and ideology. Cognition, 1, 11–46.
Chomsky, N., Place, U. T., & Schoneberger, T. (Eds.). (2000). The Chomsky–Place correspondence 1993–1994. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 17, 7–38.
Dulany, D. E. (1961). Hypotheses and habits in verbal “operant conditioning.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 251–263.
Dulany, D. E. (1968). Awareness, rules, and propositional control: A confrontation with S-R behavior therapy. In verbal behavior and general behavior therapy (pp. 340–387). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dulany, D. E. (1997). Consciousness in the explicit (deliberative) and implicit (evocative). In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness(pp. 179–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fodor, & J. A, (Katz). J. J. The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language: 1964.
Gallistel, & C. R, (Gibbon). J. The symbolic foundations of conditioned behavior: 2002.
Goldstein, H. (2002). Communication intervention for children with autism: A review of treatment efficacy. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 32, 373–396.
Hayes, S. C., Blackledge, J. T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3–20). New York: Kluwer.
Hinde, R. A., & Timbergen, N. (1958). The comparative study of species-specific behavior. In A. Roe & G. G. Simpson (Eds.), Behavior and evolution (pp. 251–268). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hineline, P. N., & Wanchisen, B. A. (1989). Correlated hypothesizing and the distinction between contingency-shaped and rule governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 243–244). New York: Plenum.
Jenkins, J. J. (1959). Review of Verbal Behavior . Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 24, 73–74.
Knapp, T. J. (1992). Verbal Behavior: The other reviews. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 10, 87–95.
Lacey, H. M. (1978). Psychological conflict and human nature: The case of behaviorism and cognition. Journal of the Theory of Social Behavior, 10, 131–155.
Leahey, T. (1987). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Luzoro, J. (1992). Dime quien te ataca y te diré quien eres [Tell me who attacks you and I will guess who you are]. In M. C. Luciano & J. Gil-Roales (Eds.), Vigencia de la obra de Skinner (pp. 341–346). Granada, Spain: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Granada.
MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99.
Malone, J. C. (2001). Ontology recapitulates philology: Willard Quine, pragmatism, and radical behaviorism. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 63–74.
Malott, R. W. (1992). Language, rule-governed behavior, and cognitivism. Behavior and Social Issues, 2, 33–41.
Mandler, G. (2002). Origins of the cognitive (r)evolution. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38, 339–353.
McPherson, A., Bonem, M., Green, G., & Osborne, J. G. (1984). A citation analysis of the influence on research of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 7, 157–167.
Mehler, J. (Ed.). (1969). Psycholinguistique et grammaire generative [Psycholinguistics and generative grammar]. Languages, 4.
Moerk, E. (1992). The clash of the giants over terminological differences. Behavior and Social Issues, 2, 1–26.
O’Donohue, W., Ferguson, K. E., & Naugle, A. E. (2003). The structure of the cognitive revolution: An examination from the philosophy of science. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 85–110.
Osgood, C. E. (1958). Review of Verbal Behavior. Contemporary Psychology, 3, 209–212.
Pena, R. S. (2003). Skinner’s influence on psychology: A study on science and human behavior. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 24, 635–644.
Quine, W. V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: Technology Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Richelle, M. N. (1976). Formal analysis and functional analysis of verbal behavior: Notes on the debate between Chomsky and Skinner. Behaviorism, 4, 209–221. (Original work published 1973)
Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117–128.
Rondal, J. A. (1994). Pieces of minds in psycholinguistics: Steven Pinker, Kenneth Wexler, and Noam Chomsky. A series of interviews conducted by Jean A. Rondal. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 85–104.
Segal, E. (1977). Towards a coherent psychology of language. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 628–654). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1972). A lecture on “having” a poem. In B. F. Skinner (Ed.), Cumulative record (3rd ed., pp. 345–355). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Smith, N. (1999). Chomsky: Ideas and ideals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Wiest, W. M. (1967). Some recent criticism of behaviorism and learning theory with special reference to Breger and McGaugh and to Chomsky. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 214–225.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I would like to express my gratitude to Noam Chomsky. Valuable contributions to this paper have been made by Robert Bailey, Gualberto Buela-Casal, Toma´s Carrasco-Giménez, Donelson E. Dulany, Marc Richelle, Arthur W. Staats, Beverly Stohl, and Julie S. Vargas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Virués-Ortega, J. The case against B. F. Skinner 45 years later: An encounter with N. Chomsky. BEHAV ANALYST 29, 243–251 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392133
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392133