Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Effects of Female Genital Mutilation on the Onset of Sexual Activity and Marriage in Guinea

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Female genital mutilation (FGM) is almost universal in Guinea and practiced by all ethnic and religious groups and social classes, although the prevalence of the various types of FGM varies by socioeconomic group. A common explanation for FGM practices is that they contribute to the social control over female sexuality and enhance the marriageability of women. These claims were tested using the 1999 Guinea Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) (N = 6753). Event history techniques were used to examine the effect of type of FGM on the age at first sex and the age at first marriage and logistic regression for the effect of FGM on premarital sex. The results showed that the type of FGM had a significant zero-order effect on the age at first marriage and the prevalence of premarital sex, but not on the age at first sex. However, these effects became non-significant once controls for age, religion, ethnicity, education, residence, and wealth were added to the model. Variations in sexual behavior, therefore, were unrelated to type of FGM, but reflected differences in the social characteristics of the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almroth, L., Almroth-Berggren, V., Hassanein, O. M., El Hadi, N., Al-Said, S. S. E., Hasan, S. S. A., et al. (2001). A community based study on the change of practice of female genital mutilation in a Sudanese village. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 74, 179–185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. A., Gilson, G. J., Vill, M. D., & Curet, L. B. (1993). Female circumcision: Obstetric issues. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 169, 1616–1618.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Direction Nationale de la Statistique, & Macro International Inc. (2000a). Enquęte démographique et de santé, Guinée 1999. Calverton, MD: Direction Nationale de la Statistique & Macro International Inc.

  • Direction Nationale de la Statistique, & Macro International Inc. (2000b). Guinea demographic and health survey 1999 [Data file]. Calverton, MD: Direction Nationale de la Statistique//Macro International Inc.

  • Douglas, M. (2004). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, C. F. (2007). Great divides: The cultural, cognitive, and social bases of the global subordination of women. American Sociological Review, 72, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (1999). The effects of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development Review, 25, 85–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage, A. J., & Van Rossem, R. (2006). Attitudes toward the discontinuation of female genital cutting among men and women in Guinea. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 92, 92–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1973). The class structure of advanced societies. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenbaum, E. (2001). The female circumcision controversy: An anthropological perspective. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenbaum, E. (2006). Sexuality issues in the movement to abolish female genital cutting in Sudan. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20, 121–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, E. K. (1993). Infibulation: Female mutilation in Islamic Northeastern Africa. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S. M., & Robertson, C. C. (2002). Introduction: Reimaging transnational sisterhood. In S. M. James & C. C. Robertson (Eds.), Genital cutting and transnational sisterhood: Disputing U.S. polemics (pp. 5–16). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. D., Ehiri, J., & Anyanwu, E. (2004). Female genital mutilation in developing countries: An agenda for public health response. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 116, 144–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H. (2007). Female genital mutilation. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology. Volume IV, F-HE (pp. 1653–1657). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, C. M. (2003). Female genital circumcision: Medical and cultural considerations. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 10, 30–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, G. (2000). Female genital cutting: The beginning of the end. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magoha, G. A., & Magoha, O. B. (2000). Current global status of female genital mutilation: A review. East African Medical Journal, 77, 268–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandara, M. U. (2004). Female genital mutilation in Nigeria. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 84, 291–298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Missailidis, K., & Gebre-Medhin, M. (2000). Female genital mutilation in eastern Ethiopia. Lancet, 356, 137–138.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstam, T. (1968). Sudanese ethics. New York: Africana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajadurai, H., & Igras, S. (2005). CARE’s experiences working with communities toward abandonment of female genital cutting (FGC). Atlanta, GA: CARE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaaban, L. M., & Harbison, S. (2005). Reaching the tipping point against female genital mutilation. Lancet, 366, 347–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shell-Duncan, B. (2001). The medicalization of female “circumcision”: Harm reduction or promotion of a dangerous practice? Social Science and Medicine, 52, 1013–1028.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toubia, N. F., & Sharief, E. H. (2003). Female genital mutilation: Have we made progress? International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 82, 251–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). (1997). The state of world population 1997. The right to choose: Reproductive rights and reproductive health. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, C. J. (2002). Searching for “voices”: Feminism, anthropology, and the global debate over female genital operations. In S. M. James & C. C. Robertson (Eds.), Genital cutting and transnational sisterhood: Disputing U.S. polemics (pp. 17–53). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (1986). A traditional practice that threatens health––Female circumcision. WHO Chronicle, 40, 31–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (1999a). Female genital mutilation information kit. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (1999b). Female genital mutilation. Programmes to date: What works and what doesn’t. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2000). Female genital mutilation (Fact sheet). Geneva: WHO.

  • Yoder, P. S., Camara, P. O., & Soumaoro, B. (1999). Female genital cutting and coming of age in Guinea. Calverton, MD: Macro International Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder, P. S., & Mahy, M. (2001). Female genital cutting in Guinea: Qualitative and quantitative research strategies (DHS Analytical studies). Calverton, MD: MEASURE DHS+.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronan Van Rossem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Rossem, R., Gage, A.J. The Effects of Female Genital Mutilation on the Onset of Sexual Activity and Marriage in Guinea. Arch Sex Behav 38, 178–185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9237-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9237-5

Keywords

Navigation