Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Google Trends and cycles of public interest in biodiversity: the animal spirits effect

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper introduces the idea of using Google Trends search query volumes for both economic and biodiversity-related terms and keywords as data source in order to produce a composite but simple indicator-early warning sign of public interest in conservation co-evolving with citizens’ concerns about economy and unemployment. The behavior of this indicator is examined mainly in the context of the European Union Member States facing the effects of economic recession after the 2008 economic crisis. Four EuroArea Member States (Germany, Greece, Italy and The Netherlands) representing various facets of the combination of biodiversity and economy conditions are used as examples of the characteristics of this indicator, during a ten year period, extending equally before and after the eruption of economic crisis. Results indicate that such an indicator uncovers that public interest in biodiversity does decelerate worldwide, in the European Union and in the four studied cases; however, an explanation of this decreasing trend as being part of larger cycles in public interest that resonate with some hysteresis with cycles of economy offers a more promising view of the phenomenon. The hypothesis that public interest in biodiversity is driven by “animal spirits”, according to Keynes’ prediction is formulated and its significance regarding communication and strategy of conservation is debated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Data retrieved: Eurostat http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do?tab=table&language=en&pcode=teilm020&tableSelection=1&plugin=1, on August 10, 2014. U-B: Google Trends on August 1, 2014; averaged values for each year

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof GA, Shiller RJ (2009) Animal spirits. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderreg WRL, Goldsmith GR (2014) Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climate’ media event. Environ Res Lett 9:054005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/5/054005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew L, Arndt D, Beristain N, Cass T, Clow L, Colmenares B, Damm K, Hatcher R, Jackson N, Pasquesi W, Chamberlain-Pham N, Pryd JA, Rund T, Russell G, Ryle C, Schmidt T, Sigan S, Sinkus K, Sneyd K, Strode J, Wallen C, McCallum ML (2016) Changes in United States’ citizens’ interest in sustainability. Life Excit Biol 4(3):138–164. doi:10.9784/LEB4(3)Andrew.01

    Google Scholar 

  • Anielski M (2007) The economics of happiness: building genuine wealth. New Society Publishers, Canada, p 288

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnosky AD (2010) Halfway there. Kyoto J 75. http://ib.berkeley.edu/labs/barnosky/KyotoJournalbarnosky650.pdf

  • Barrett CB, Travis AJ, Dasgupta P (2011) On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps. PNAS 108:13907–13912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beatie W, Ehrlich PR (2001) Wild solutions: how biodiversity is money in the bank. Yale University Press, Yale

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim BD (2008) Behavioral welfare economics. Working Paper 14622, National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w14622

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164–1168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Barnosky AD, García A, Pringle RM, Palmer TM (2015) Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv 1(5):e1400253. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1400253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Choi H, Varian H (2012) Predicting the present with Google Trends. Econ Rec 88:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn-Bendit D (2010) Que faire? Pluriel, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Coondoo D, Dinda S (2002) Causality between income and emission: a country group-specific econometric analysis. Ecol Econ 40:351–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Baldi A, Bartuska A, Baste IA, Bilgin A, Brondizio E, Chan KMA, Figueroa VE, Duraiappah A, Fischer M, Hill R, Koetz T, Leadley P, Lyver P, Mace GM, Martin-Lopez B, Okumura M, Pacheco D, Pascual U, Perez ES, Reyers B, Roth E, Saito O, Scholes RJ, Sharma N, Tallis H, Thaman R, Watson R, Yahara T, Hamid ZA, Akosim C, Al-Hafedh Y, Allahverdiyev R, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Asfaw Z, Bartus G, Brooks LA, Caillaux J, Dalle G, Darnaedi D, Driver A, Erpul G, Escobar-Eyzaguirre P, Failler P, Fouda AMM, Fu B, Gundimeda H, Hashimoto S, Homer F, Lavorel S, Lichtenstein G, Mala WA, Mandivenyi W, Matczak P, Mbizvo C, Mehrdadi M, Metzger JP, Mikissa JB, Moller H, Mooney HA, Mumby P, Nagendra H, Nesshover C, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Pataki G, Roue M, Rubis J, Schultz M, Smith P, Sumaila R, Takeuchi K, Thomas S, Verma M, Yeo-Chang Y, Zlatanova D (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz S, Adger WN (2003) Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. J Environ Manage 68:23–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Do Y, Kim JY, Lineman M, Kim D-K, Joo GJ (2014) Using internet search behavior to assess public awareness of protected wetlands. Conserv Biol 29(1):271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dressel S, Sandström C, Ericsson G (2015) A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conserv Biol 29(2):565–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farley J (2008) The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conserv Biol 22:1399–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farnworth MJ, Watson H, Adams NJ (2014) Understanding attitudes toward the control of nonnative wild and feral mammals: similarities and differences in the opinions of the general public, animal protectionists, and conservationists in New Zealand (Aotearoa). J Appl Anim Welf Sci 17(1):1–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ficetola GF (2013) Is interest toward the environment really declining? The complexity of analysing trends using internet search data. Biodivers Conserv 22:2983–2988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Young JA (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biol Conserv 136:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer A, Bednar-Friedl B, Langers F, Dobrovodskα Μ, Geamana Ν, Skogen Κ, Dumortier Μ (2011) Universal criteria for species conservation priorities? Findings from a survey of public views across Europe. Biol Conserv 144(3):998–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flash Barometer (2007, 2010, 2013). Attitudes towards biodiversity. Report 219; 290; 379. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/pdf

  • Funk SM, Rusowsky D (2014) The importance of cultural knowledge and scale for analysing internet search data as a proxy for public interest toward the environment. Biodivers Conserv 23:3101–3112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangaas KE, Kaltenborn BP, Andreassen HP (2015) Environmental attitudes associated with large-scale cultural differences, not local environmental conflicts. Environ Conserv 42(1):41–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geishecker I, Siedler T (2012) Job loss fears and (Extremist) Party identification: First evidence from panel data. IZA DP No. 6996

  • Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L (2009) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457:1012–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy J, Hall C, Klitgaard K, Krall L (2010) What every conservation biologist should know about economic theory. Conserv Biol 24:1440–1447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh L, Rosenblatt Z (1984) Job insecurity: toward conceptual clarity source. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van der Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1984) The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Acad Manag Rev 9(3):389–398. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4279653

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats (2016) Internet World users by language. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats7.htm

  • Jepson P, Canney S (2003) Values-led conservation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns D (2007) Like it or not, Politics is the solution. Conserv Biol 21(2):287–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston DW, Lordan G (2014) When work disappears: racial prejudice and recession labour market penalties. LSE/CEP DP No. 1257

  • Keynes JM (1936) The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Do Y, Im R-Y, Kim G-Y, Joo G-J (2014) Use of large web-based data to identify public interest and trends related to endangered species. Biodivers Conserv 23:2961–2984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriss PH, Loewenstein G, Wang X, Weber RA (2011) Behind the veil of ignorance: self-serving bias in climate change negotiations. Judgm Decis Mak 6:602–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristoufek L (2013) Bitcoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: quantifying the realtionship between phenomena of the Internet era. Sci Rep 3:3415. doi:10.1038/srep03415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald K (2010) Business, biodiversity and new “fields” of conservation: the world conservation congress and the renegotiation of organizational order. Conserv Soc 8:256–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow AH (1954) Motivation and personality. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum ML, Bury GW (2013) Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment. Biodivers Conserv 22:1355–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallum ML, Bury GW (2014) Public interest in the environment is falling: a response to Ficetola (2013). Biodivers Conserv 23:1057–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK (1938) Social structure and anomie. Am Sociol Rev 3:672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20(8):430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mills JH, Waite TH (2009) Economic prosperity, biodiversity conservation and the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 68:2087–2095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller MK (2014) The relationship between types of human–animal interaction and attitudes about animals: an exploratory study. Anthrozoös 27(2):295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neemo/LIFE Team (2016) LIFE: contributing to employment and economic growth. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/life/publications/lifepublications/generalpublications/documents/jobs_growth_study.pdf

  • Nghiem LTP, Papworth SK, Lim FKS, Carrasco LR (2016) Analysis of the capacity of Google Trends to measure interest in conservation topics and the role of online news. PLoS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152802

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) The polls—trends twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opin Q 71:444–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novacek MJ (2008) Engaging the public in biodiversity issues. PNAS 105(1):11571–11578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Papworth SK, Nghiem TPL, Chimalakonda D, Posa RMC, Wijedasa LS, Bickford D, Carrasco LR (2015) Quantifying the role of online news in linking conservation research to Facebook and Twitter. Conserv Biol 29(3):825–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parks S, Gowdy J (2013) What have economists learned about valuing nature? A review essay. Ecosyst Serv 3:e1–e10. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C, Naeem S, Ahrestani F, Bunker DE, Burkill P, Canziani G, Elmqvist T, Ferrati R, Fuhrman J, Jaksic F, Kawabata Z, Kinzig A, Mace GM, Milano F, Mooney H, Prieur-Richard A-H, Tschirhart J, Weisser W (2010) Ecosystem services for 2020. Science 330:323–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson G (2010) Growth of ecosystem services concept. http://rs.resalliance.org/2010/01/21/growth-of-ecosystem-services-concept/

  • Pitelka LF (1994) Biodiversity and policy decisions. In: Schulze E-D, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function, p 481–493

  • Preis T, Moat HS, Stanley HE (2013) Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends. Sci Rep 3:1684–1689. doi:10.1038/srep01684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Proulx R, Massicotte P, Pepino M (2013) Googling trends in conservation biology. Conserv Biol 28(1):44–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards DR (2013) The content of historical books as an indicator of past interest in environmental issues. Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0555-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders CD, Brook AT, Myers OE (2006) Using psychology to save biodiversity and human well-being. Conserv Biol 20:702–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1954) History of economic analysis. London, Allen & Unwin

  • Shellenberger M, Nordhaus T (2007) Break through: from the death of environ-mentalism to the politics of possibility. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver N (2012) The signal and the noise. Penguin Books, Allen Lane

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Eurobarometer (2015) Attitudes of Europeans towards biodiversity. Report 436. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/special/pdf

  • Standard Eurobarometer Series (2004–2015) Public opinion in the European Union, vols 62–84. European Commission, TNS opinion & social. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm

  • Takacs D (1996) The idea of biodiversity: philosophies of paradise. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Troumbis A (2017) Declining Google Trends of public interest in biodiversity: semantics, statistics or traceability of changing priorities? Biodivers Conserv. doi:10.1007/s10531-017-1294-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Unesco (2009) Investing in cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue. World Report 2. www.unesco.org/en/word-reports/cultural-diversity

  • Vermeulen S, Koziell I (2002) Integrating global and local values: a review of biodiversity assessment. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilde GR, Pope KL (2013) Worldwide trends in fishing interest indicated by internet search volume. Fish Manage Ecol 20:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

In loving memory of Professor Leonidas Louloudis (1947–2014), a leader in agri-environmental policy and economics in Greece. The author expresses his thanks to anonymous reviewers whose comments helped improving the first version of this paper. T. Selidis provided additional support to AT for a series of papers on biodiversity conservation issues.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biodiversity Conservation Laboratory, Department of Environmental Studies, University of the Aegean, University Hill, 81100, Mytilini, Greece

    Andreas Y. Troumbis

Authors
  1. Andreas Y. Troumbis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Y. Troumbis.

Additional information

Communicated by Dirk Sven Schmeller.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: Biodiversity appreciation and engagement.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 86 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Troumbis, A.Y. Google Trends and cycles of public interest in biodiversity: the animal spirits effect. Biodivers Conserv 26, 3421–3443 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1413-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1413-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation