Published: 22 October 2008
Personal Status Laws in Morocco and Tunisia: A Comparative Exploration of the Possibilities for Equality-Enhancing Reform in Bangladesh
Nowrin Tamanna
 
Feminist Legal Studies  16, Article number: 323 (2008) Cite this article
818 Accesses
6 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics
Abstract
This paper focuses on successful reform strategies invoked in parts of the Muslim world to address issues of gender inequality in the context of Islamic personal law. It traces the development of personal status laws in Tunisia and Morocco, exploring the models they offer in initiating equality-enhancing reforms in Bangladesh, where a secular and equality-based reform approach conflicts with Islamic-based conservatism. Recent landmark family law reforms in Morocco show the possibility of achieving ‘women-friendly’ reforms within an Islamic legal framework. Moreover, the Tunisian Personal Status Code, with its successive reforms, shows that a gender equality-based model of personal law can be successfully integrated into the Muslim way of life. This study examines the response of Muslim societies to equality-based reforms and differences in approach in initiating them. The paper maps these sometimes competing approaches, locating them within contemporary feminist debates related to gender equality in the East and West.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Access options
Instant access to the full article PDF.
US$ 39.95
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
US$ 79
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent this article via DeepDyve.
Learn more about Institutional subscriptions
Notes
1.Code du Statut Personnel: www.jurisitetunisie.com/tunisie/codes/csp/Menu.html (accessed 9 September 2007).
2.Equality is essentialist in that it tends to rely on the construction of a generic female identity that denies significant differences between women derived from race, ethnic background, class, sexuality etc. and hence assumes identical experiences and interests among women.
3.Mojab (2001, p. 139), however, observes that “unlike Western liberalism, which despite its shortcomings, has succeeded in instituting an extensive regime of rights guaranteeing legal equality, ‘Islamic feminism’ is not even ambitious enough to demand universal formal equality”.
4.See also Tamimi (2001) for an overview and critique of Al-Ghannouchi’s work.
5.Mahmood (2003, p. 19) observes: “we do not ask, for example, what would it mean to take the resources of Islamic traditions and question many of the liberal political categories and principles for the contradictions and problems they embody?”
6.Moghissi (2000, pp. 141–142) observes that although the Qur’an makes men and women equal in the eyes of Allah, it ascribes them different rights, roles and obligations. Shari’a-based equality thus works against women and non-Muslims as it accords them inferior status and prescribes sexual hierarchy within the family.
7.Muslims are broadly divided into two main sects, Sunni and Shia, resulting from a political dispute over succession following the Prophet’s death. The four main schools of the Sunni sect are the Hanafi, Hanbali, Maliki and Shafii schools. While the schools agree on certain fundamental legal issues, their various interpretations of the sources of Shari’a have given rise to different rules on some points of law.
8.The legal history of these two countries is similar to that of those in the Indian Subcontinent, including Bangladesh, India and Pakistan. While, under British rule, the legal system of these countries underwent reforms based on secular ideals, the sphere of personal laws was left untouched for fear of a political backlash. In all three countries of the Subcontinent, religious laws regulate the family sphere.
9.For details of the Code, see Kelly (1996) and the Law and Religion Program of Emory University, Study of Islamic Family Law (IFL), http://www.law.emory.edu/ifl/legal/morocco.htm#text (accessed 8 September 2008).
10.Kelly (1996) observes that Bourguiba, then President of Tunisia, played a pivotal role in securing the rights of women under the Code. Bourguiba was hugely influenced by the teachings of liberals such as Jamal al-Dil al-Afgani and Khayr al-Din Pasha al-Tunisi, who believed that women’s backward position in some Muslim societies was due to the failure of these societies to continue to evolve with time, and not to any flaw inherent within Islam.
11.Article 6 states: “All citizens have the same rights and the same duties. They are equal before the law”. Articles 20 and 21 recognise that women have the right to vote and stand for public office.
12.See http://www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/gems/eeo/law/maroc/cons.htm (accessed 8 September 2008).
13.Bordat and Kouzzi (2004) attribute the reforms’ “smooth passage” to the changed political environment following the May 2003 terrorist attacks in Casablanca, which implicated Islamist groups. This in effect muted the religious opposition to the revision of the Code.
14.The full text of the speech is available online at: http://www.wluml.org/english/newsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[157]=x-157-21950%20&cmd[189]=x-189-21950#top (accessed 8 September 2008).
15.See http://www.globalrights.org/morocco for an unofficial translation of the Moudawana; Association Démocratique des Femmes du Maroc (2004); Law and Religion Program of Emory University, supra n 9.
16.Supra n 14.
17.According to Article 26, the Constitution is the supreme law, operating as a benchmark for determining the validity of all other laws. Article 28 guarantees equal status and rights to all citizens, irrespective of religion, race, caste or sex.
18.Muslim Personal Law (Shari’at) Application Act (1937) (XXVI of 1937) 9 PC 404, 11 BC 387.
19.(VIII of 1961) 14 PC 67.
20.See English translation of the Holy Qur’an by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, http://www.islamicity.com/mosque/Surai.htm (accessed 8 September 2008).
21.Application for such permission must be made to the Chairman of the Union Council (a unit of the local government) who then constitutes an Arbitration Council consisting of representatives from both the parties. If the Council is satisfied that the proposed marriage is necessary and just, it may grant the permission requested. A party aggrieved by the decision may file a revision application to the Sub-Divisional officer, a bureaucrat at the local government level, whose decision is final and cannot be challenged in any court.
22.MFLO, Section 6.
23.MFLO, Section 13.
24.As discussed below, the husband’s power to initiate unilateral divorce without adjudication or showing any reason remains intact under the Ordinance.
25.Polygamy is prohibited; offenders are liable to a prison sentence of one year and/or a fine, according to Article 18 of the Code.
26.According to Article 41, “the court will not authorize polygamy: if an exceptional and objective justification is not proven or if the man does not have sufficient resources to support the two families and guarantee all maintenance rights, accommodation and equality in all aspects of life”.
27.When the wife initiates divorce and provides consideration (e.g. surrender of her dower) to the husband for her release, it is called khula. When dissolution is effected by the agreement of the parties it is known as mubarat.
28.Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act 1939, Section 2.
29.PLD [1959] (WP) Lahore 566.
30.PLD [1967] SC 97.
31.[1980] 32 DLR 294.
32.MFLO, Section 7(1).
33.Section 7(3).
34.Section 7(4).
35.See supra n 9.
36.Ibid.
37.See supra n 15.
38.Ibid.
39.Ibid.
40.The Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act (1988). This amendment was later challenged by various women’s groups as being inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution and with various UN Conventions.
41.[2000] 5 BLC 660–661.
42.[1997] 17 BLD 4.
43.For example, Frohmann and Mertz (1994) examine whether legal reforms regarding violence against women and prosecution of violence cases in the last two decades have improved women’s experience and suggest that further serious attention to the socio-cultural construction and context of legal practice is a crucial step for future reform efforts.
44.Larson (1993) outlines some of the concerns of this ‘third wave’, and questions whether law can be used to effect social change.
45.According to official estimates, 42% of urban women and 82% of rural women in Morocco are illiterate. See supra n 15 and Maddy-Weitzman (2005).
46.Sobhan (1978) observes that since Islamic laws have in the Subcontinent been further modified, not only by statutes and case law but by various customs, one should not confuse Muslim women’s status in Bangladesh with that of women’s status in Islam as such, although to a certain extent one influences the other.
47.Other examples of the use of takhayyur include the Jordanian Law of Family Rights 1951 and Syrian Law of Personal Rights 1953.
48.(VIII of 1939) 9 PC 716.
49.See An-Na’im (1990), who suggests expanding the scope of ijtihad to effect even reinterpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith where necessary.
50.Editor, Daily Banglabazar Patrika and two others v District Magistrate and Deputy Commissioner, Naogaon (2000) Writ Petition No. 5897.
References
Alam, Shah. 1991. State-religion in Bangladesh: A critique of the eighth amendment to the constitution. South Asia Journal 14: 313–334.
Google Scholar
 
Al-Ghannouchi, Rachid. 2000. Secularism in the Arab Maghreb. In Islam and secularism in the Middle East, ed. Azzam Tamimi and John L. Esposito, 97–123. New York: NYU Press.
Google Scholar
 
Al-Hibri, Azizah. 2000. Deconstructing patriarchal jurisprudence in Islamic law: A faithful approach. In Global critical race feminism: An international reader, ed. Adrien Katherine Wing, 221–233. New York: NYU Press.
Google Scholar
 
Anisuzzaman, 1991. Religion, politics and the state. In Bangladesh towards 21st century, ed. Mohiuddin Ahmed, 1–12. Dhaka: CDL.
Google Scholar
 
An-Na’im, Abdullahi Ahmed. 1990. Towards an Islamic reformation: Civil liberties, human rights, and international law. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
Google Scholar
 
Association Démocratique des Femmes du Maroc. 2004. Comparison of former Moroccan Family Law with the new provisions. http://www.learningpartnership.org/docs/moroccofamlaw.pdf​. Accessed 8 September 2008.
Bordat, Stephanie Willman, and Saida Kouzzi. 2004. The challenge of implementing Morocco’s new personal status law. Arab Reform Bulletin 2(8). http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=1302&prog=zgp&proj=zdrl​. Accessed 8 September 2008.
Borrmans, Maurice. 1963. Code du statut personnel et evolution sociale en certains pays musulmans. Institut des Belles Lettres Arabes (IBLA) 26: 69–80.
Google Scholar
 
Collectif 95 Maghreb Egalité. 2003. One hundred steps, one hundred provisions: For an egalitarian codification of family and personal status laws in the Maghreb (Discussion Paper). London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.
Frohmann, Lisa, and Elizabeth Mertz. 1994. Legal reform and social construction: Violence, gender, and the law. Law and Social Inquiry 19: 829–851.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Gomez-Rivas, Camilo. 2008. Morocco’s imperfect remedy for gender inequality. Middle East Report 247 (Summer). http://www.merip.org/mer/mer247/gomez-rivas.html​. Accessed 8 September 2008.
Government of Tunisia. 2002. Combined initial and second periodic reports of States Parties to the Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. UN Doc. No. CEDAW/C/TUN/1-2.
Harris, Angela P. 1990. Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review 42: 581–616.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Hassan, Riffat. 1987. Equal before Allah? Woman-man equality in the Islamic tradition. Harvard Divinity Bulletin 17(2): 2–4.
Google Scholar
 
Hossain, Sara. 1994. Equality in the home: Women’s rights and personal laws in South Asia. In Human rights of women, ed. Rebecca J. Cook, 465–494. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar
 
Hunter, Rosemary. 1996. Deconstructing the subjects of feminism: The essentialism debate in feminist theory and practice. Australian Feminist Law Journal 6: 135–162.
Google Scholar
 
Jagwanth, Saras, and Christina Murray. 2002. Ten years of transformation: How has gender equality in South Africa fared? Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 14: 255–299.
Google Scholar
 
Jhappan, Radha. 1998. The equality pit or the rehabilitation of justice. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 10: 60–107.
Google Scholar
 
Kabeer, Naila. 1989. The quest for national identity: Women, Islam and the state in Bangladesh (Discussion Paper No. 268). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Kamal, Sultana. 2001. Her unfearing mind: Women and Muslim laws in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Ain O Salish Kendro.
Google Scholar
 
Kelly, Patricia. 1996. Finding common ground: Islamic values and gender equity in Tunisia’s reformed personal status law. In Shifting boundaries in marriage and divorce in Muslim communities (Special Dossier), 75–105. London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.
Larson, Jane. 1993. Introduction: Third wave—Can feminists use the law to effect social change in the 1990s? Northwestern University Law Review 87: 1252–1253.
Google Scholar
 
Maddy-Weitzman, Bruce. 2005. Women, Islam, and the Moroccan state: The struggle over the personal status law. Middle East Journal 59: 393–410.
Google Scholar
 
Mahmood, Saba. 2001. Feminist theory, embodiment, and the docile agent: Some reflections on the Egyptian Islamic revival. Cultural Anthropology 16: 202–236.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Mahmood, Saba. 2003. Questioning liberalism, too: A response to ‘Islam and the challenge of democracy’. Boston Review: A Political and Literary Forum 28(2): 18–20.
Google Scholar
 
Mahmood, Saba. 2006. Secularism, hermeneutics, empire: The politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture 18(2): 323–347.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Mayer, Ann Elizabeth. 1996. Reform of personal status laws in North Africa: A problem of Islamic or Mediterranean laws? London: Women Living Under Muslim Laws.
Google Scholar
 
Mernisssi, Fatima. 1991. The veil and the male elite: A feminist interpretation of women’s rights in Islam. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Google Scholar
 
Ministry of Women and Family Affairs, Tunisia. 1999. Post-Beijing plan of action (1997–2001). http://www.un.org/esa/documents/ga/conf177/natrep/nap1996-tunisia.htm​. Accessed 8 September 2008.
Moghissi, Haideh. 2000. Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. Dhaka: UPL.
Google Scholar
 
Mojab, Shahrzad. 2001. Theorizing the politics of “Islamic feminism”. Feminist Review 69: 124–146.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Monsoor, Taslima. 1999. From patriarchy to gender equity: Family law and its impact on women in Bangladesh. Dhaka: UPL.
Google Scholar
 
Murshid, Tazeen M. 1996. The sacred and the secular: Bengal Muslim discourses 1871–1977. Dhaka: UPL.
Google Scholar
 
Schacht, Joseph. 1964. Introduction to Islamic law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar
 
Serajuddin, Alamgir Muhammad. 1991. Shari’a law and society: Tradition and change in the Indian Subcontinent. Dhaka: Asiatic Society of Bangladesh.
Google Scholar
 
Shahidian, Hammed. 1994. The Iranian left and “the women question” in the revolution of 1978–79. International Journal of Middle East Studies 26: 223–247.
Article
 
Google Scholar
 
Sobhan, Salma. 1978. Legal status of women in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Law and International Affairs.
Google Scholar
 
Tamimi, Azzam. 2001. Rachid Ghannouchi: A democrat within Islamism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
 
The Law Commission, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. 2005. Report on a reference by the government towards the possibility of framing out of a Uniform Family Code for all communities of Bangladesh relating to marriage, divorce, guardianship, inheritance etc.​http://www.lawcommissionbangladesh.org/reports/69.pdf​. Accessed 8 September 2008.
Wing, Adrien Katherine. 2000. Global critical race feminism: An international reader. New York: New York University Press.
Google Scholar
 
Download references
Acknowledgement
I am indebted to Professor Joanne Conaghan for her valuable comments and encouragement.
Author information
Affiliations
School of Law, University of Reading, Foxhill House, Whiteknights Road, Reading, RG6 7BA, UK
Nowrin Tamanna
Corresponding author
Correspondence to Nowrin Tamanna.
Rights and permissions
Reprints and Permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tamanna, N. Personal Status Laws in Morocco and Tunisia: A Comparative Exploration of the Possibilities for Equality-Enhancing Reform in Bangladesh. Fem Leg Stud 16, 323 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-008-9099-9
Download citation
Received
30 September 2008
Accepted
30 September 2008
Published
22 October 2008
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-008-9099-9
Keywords
Bangladesh
Equality
Islam
Law reform
Morocco
Personal law
Tunisia
Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips
Academic Edition Corporate Edition
Home Impressum Legal informationPrivacy statement California Privacy StatementHow we use cookiesManage cookies/Do not sell my data AccessibilityContact us
Not logged in - 66.249.83.3
Not affiliated
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.
Your privacy
We use cookies to make sure that our website works properly, as well as some "optional" cookies to personalise content and advertising, provide social media features and analyse how people use our site. By accepting some or all optional cookies you give consent to the processing of your personal data, including transfer to third parties, some in countries outside of the European Economic Area that do not offer the same data protection standards as the country where you live. You can decide which optional cookies to accept by clicking on "Manage Settings", where you can also find more information about how your personal data is processed.View our privacy policy
Log in