Skip to main content
Log in

Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we address the concept of business architecture. We explain the concept and, based on a case study, discuss its relevance, operation, relationship with strategy and business models, and value for an organization. We also shortly discuss the approach that was taken to create the business architecture; how it was based on and derived from the business strategy. Business architectures contribute to clarify the complexity within an organization and form a useful starting point from which to develop subsequent functional, information, process and application architectures. We clarify these relationships through an architecture linkage model. Having an explicit business architecture also helps to structure the responsibilities within an organization, and to shape outsourcing activities, within the primary process as well as with regard to ICT-support. Business architectures contribute to an adequate ICT-governance in order to orchestrate the resources for critical business activities and how to manage the development and support for e-business efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbab F, Bonsangue M, Scholten J-G, Iacob M-E, Jonkers H, Lankhorst M, Proper E, Stam A. State of the art in architecture frameworks and tools. Enschede: Telematica Instituut, 2002.

  • Bernes P, Nemes L. A framework to define a generic enterprise reference architecture and methodology. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 1996;9(3):179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besson I, Green S, Sa J. Linking business processes and information systems provision in a dynamic environment. Information Systems Frontiers 2002;4(3):317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best Michael H. The New Competition—Institutions of Industrial Restructuring, Cambridge, Polity Press, 1990.

  • Bouwman H, van den Ham E. Business models and e-metrics, a state of the art. In: Priessl B, Bouwman H, Steinfield C, eds, Life after the Dot. Com bust. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 2003.

  • Chandler AD. Scale and Scope: the Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Boston, First Harvard University Press 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra C, Kumar S. Enterprise architectural framework for supply chain integration. Industrial Management and Data Systems 2001;101(6):290–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child J, Faulkner D. Strategies of Cooperation—Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg P, King M, Hussin H. IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 2002;(11):109–132.

  • Hammer M, Champy J. Re-engineering the corporation: A manifesto for business revolution. New York, Harper Collins, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedman J, Kalling T. The business model concept: Theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. European Journal of Information Systems 2003;12:49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J, Venkatraman N. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 1993;32(1):4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEEE 1471. IEEE recommended practice for architectural description of software intensive systems, Oct. 9, 2000.

  • ISO 15704. Industrial automation system-requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies 1999.

  • Kay, John A. Foundations of Corporate Success—How Business Strategies Add Value. New York, Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koushik S, Joodi P. E-business architecture design issues. IT Pro May/June 2000;38–43.

  • Mathora Y. Enterprise architecture: An overview. Brint Institute, 1996.

  • Maes R. Reconsidering information management through a generic framework. Amsterdam: PrimaVera working Paper 1999;99–15.

  • Maes R, Rijsenbrij D, Truijens O, Goedvolk H. Redefining business-IT alignment through a unified framework. White paper, 2000.

  • McDavid D. A standard for business architecture desciption. IBM Systems Journal (1999);38(1):12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGovern J, Ambler SW, Stevens ME, Linn J, Sharan V, Jo EK. Enterprise architecture, a practical guide. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles Matthew K, Hubermann A. Michael qualitative data analysis. A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills (Sage) 1984.

  • Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y. An e-business model ontology for modelling e-business. In: Loebbecke, C., Wigand, R., Gricar, J., Puchicar, A., and Lenart, G., eds., Ereality: Constructing the Economy. Proceedings 15th Beld Electronic Commerce Conference, Bled Slovenai June 17–19, 2002.

  • Powell, MW. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. Research in Organisational Behaviour, 1990 12:295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Hamel G. The core competencies of the corporation. Harvard Business Review (May–June) 1990;79–91.

  • Presley A, Sarkis J, Barnett W, Liles D. Engineering the virtual enterprise: An architecture-driven modelling approach. The International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 2001;13:145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB. Intelligent enterprise—a knowledge and service based paradigm. New York, The Free Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rensburg ACJ. AN object-oriented architecture for business transformation. Computers Industrial Engineering 1997;33(1–2):167–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson G, Jackson B, Pages M. Principle-based enterprise architecture: Lessons from texaco and star enterprise. Management Information Systems Quarterly 1990;14(4):385–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Synnott WR. The information weapon. In: Winning Customers and Markets with Technology, New York: Wiley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo T, Ang J. Critical success factors in the alignment of IS plans with business plans. International Journal of Information Management 1999;(19):173–185.

  • Thompson G, Frances J, Levacic R, Mitchell J. Market, Hierarchies and Networks, the Coordination of Social Life. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd J, Bessant J, Pavitt K. Managing innovation. Integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers P. Electronic commerce strategies and models for business-to-business trading. Chichester: John Willey Publisher, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacy M, Wiersema FF. The Discipline of Market Leaders. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban E, McLean E, Wheterbe J. Information technology for management. Transforming Business in the Digital Economy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Diepen T, Multi-channel distribution in financial services. Impact of Electronic Distribution Channels on the Internal Organisation. TIC, 2000;6:37–60.

  • Veasey P. Use of enterprise architecture in managing strategic change. Business Proces Management Journal. 2001;7(5):420–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review Winter, 1994;73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenden P, Welch DE. Business architecture: A holistic approach to defining the organization necessary to deliver a strategy. Knowledge and Process Management 2000;7(2):96–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman JA. A framework for information system architecture. IBM Systems 1987.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Versteeg.

Additional information

Gerrit Versteeg is managing partner/business architect for FourPoints Intelligence and has almost twenty years of experience in designing architectures for a variety of large customers. He graduated with honors in Strategic Management at Rotterdam School of Management (Erasmus University) and is currently pursuing his PhD researching the field of Business Architecture at Delft University of Technology.

Harry Bouwman is an associate professor at Delft University of Technology, Information and Communication Technology, Faculty Technology, Policy and Management. He served as an interim chair of the ICT-section in the period 2000–2002 and in 2004. He studied political science at the Free University of Amsterdam (1979). He is specialized in research methods and techniques, statistic and communication sciences. He followed courses in the domain of Computer Science at the Open University (1985–86). He received his PhD at Catholic University Nijmegen in 1986 at the Faculty of Social Science. Fields of interest:—ICT and organizations, strategic management in relation to ICT-management, Business Architecture;- Business models, Customer Value, Network formation, specifically with regard to 3G+ Mobile telecommunications services;- Innovation Management, ICT-entrepreneurship, high-tech ICT clusters or technopoles, incubators, role of national and local governments, and - Technology neutral regulation of telecommunication, (history of) Internet, Interconnection issues, QoS, telecommunication management.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Versteeg, G., Bouwman, H. Business architecture: A new paradigm to relate business strategy to ICT. Inf Syst Front 8, 91–102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7973-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-006-7973-z

Keywords

Navigation