Abstract
This paper shows that, contrary to preceding studies, a dialect spoken in a western region of Japan (Kansai dialect) allows not only nominative Case, as is widely known in literature, but also accusative Case, to convert into genitive Case in a prenominal clause. We will call this phenomenon Accusative-Genitive conversion. This phenomenon has been little known in theoretical literature because of its limited occurrence. As our detailed survey reveals, this less-known Case conversion is possible only if some conditions on the clause in which the conversion appears are satisfied. We also demonstrate that those necessary conditions for Accusative-Genitive conversion are, indeed, deduced by some independently supported hypotheses under the Agree/Phase theory. Thus, Accusative-Genitive conversion is within the realm of the Agree/Phase theory, and the characteristic conditions on its occurrence, in turn, lend support to the recent syntactic theory. Our theory of this phenomenon further predicts that, if our mechanism serves as an independent mechanism for genitive-Case valuation, it will also function as converting nominative Case into genitive Case. It will be shown that this is indeed the Case, which strongly supports the validity of our mechanism in Kansai Japanese.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, Nicholas, and Eric McCready. 2005. Modals and a compositional account of counter-factuals. Ms., University of Texas, Austin.
Asher Nicholas, McCready Eric (2007) Were, would, might and a compositional account of counterfactuals. Journal of Semantics 24: 93–129
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null subjects. PhD diss., MIT.
Barbosa Pilar (2009) Two kinds of subject pro. Studia Linguistica 63: 2–58
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and beyond, ed. Adriana Belletti, 104–131. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1998. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Comrie Bernard (1985) Tense. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Felser Claudia (1999) Verbal complement clauses: A minimalist study of direct perception constructions. John Benjamins, Amsterdam
Frampton, John, and Sam Gutmann. 2001. Feature sharing. Ms., Northeastern University.
Fukui Naoki, Nishigauchi Taisuke (1992) Head-movement and Case-marking in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 14: 1–36
Haegeman, Liliane. 2009. The movement derivation of conditional clauses. Ms., University of Ghent.
Han Chung-Hye (2000) The structure and interpretation of imperatives: Mood and force in Universal Grammar. Routledge, Berlin
Harada Shin-Ichi (1971) Ga-No conversion and idiolectal variation in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 60: 25–38
Hasegawa Nobuko (1985) On the so-called “zero pronouns” in Japanese. The Linguistic Review 4: 289–341
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. On nominative-genitive conversion. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39, ed. Elena Guerzoni and Ora Matushansky, 65–123. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Hiraiwa, Ken. 2005. Dimensions of symmetry in syntax. PhD diss., MIT.
Inoue, Kazuko. 1976. Henkei bunpou to nihongo (Joo) [Transformational grammar and Japanese I]. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Kuno, Susumu. 1976. Subject raising. In Syntax and semantics 5, ed. Masayoshi Shibatani, 17–49. New York: Academic Press.
McCloskey James (2007) The grammar of autonomy in Irish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25: 825–857
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1993. LF Case-checking and minimal link condition. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19, ed. Colin Phillips, 213–254. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Ochi Masao (2001) Move-F and ga/no conversion in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 10: 247–286
Palmer Frank R. (2001) Mood and modality, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Partee, Barbara H. 2005. Semantic typology of indefinites. Ms., Moscow State University.
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. PhD diss., MIT.
Safir Kenneth J. (1985) Syntactic chains. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Shibatani Masayoshi (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tanaka Hidekazu (2002) Raising to object out of CP. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 637–657
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1993. L-relatedness and its parametric variation. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 19, ed. Colin Phillips, 377–399. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Ura, Hiroyuki. 1994. Varieties of raising and the feature-based bare-phrase structure theory. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics #7. MITWPL.
Ura, Hiroyuki, and Shin’ya Asano 2007. Nihongo-no “taikaku-zokukaku koutai” to Agree/Phase riron-ni yoru Wh-itti bunseki [Accusative-Genitive conversion in Japanese and Wh-agreement analysis under the Agree/Phase theory]. Paper presented at the 134th meeting of the Linguistics Society of Japan, June 16–17, Reitaku University, Chiba, Japan.
Watanabe Akira (1996a) Case absorption and Wh-agreement. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Watanabe Akira (1996b) Nominative-genitive conversion and agreement in Japanese: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 5: 373–410
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asano, S., Ura, H. Mood and Case: with special reference to genitive Case conversion in Kansai Japanese. J East Asian Linguist 19, 37–59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9055-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9055-y