Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative analysis between impact factor and h-index for pharmacology and psychiatry journals

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using strictly the same parameters (identical two publication years (2004–2005) and identical one-year citation window (2006)), IF 2006 was compared with h-index 2006 for two samples of “Pharmacology and Pharmacy” and “Psychiatry” journals computed from the ISI Web of Science. For the two samples, the IF and the h-index rankings of the journals are very different. The correlation coefficient between the IF and the h-index is high for Psychiatry but lower for Pharmacology. The linearity test performed between the h-index and \( \,IF^{{{\frac{\alpha }{\alpha \, + 1}}}} .\,n\,^{{{\frac{1}{\alpha \, + 1}}}} \) showed the great sensitivity of the model compared with α. The IF and h-index can be completely complementary when evaluating journals of the same scientific discipline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2007). What do we know about the h index? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., Glanzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, W., & Hunter, J. (2006). What the impact factor means for surgery journals. World Journal of Surgery, 30, 1368–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delavalle, R., Schilling, L., Rodriguez, M., Van De Sompel, H., & Bollen, J. (2007). Refining dermatology journal impact factors using pagerank. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 57, 116–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, P., Loh, M., & Mondry, A. (2005). The “impact factor” revisited. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 2, 7. doi:10.1186/1742-5581-2-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzel, W. (2006). On the h-index—A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact. Scientometrics, 67(2), 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, F., Hecht, B., & Sandberg, A. (1998). The journal impact factor: A misnamed, misleading, misused measure. Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics, 104, 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2006). A case study: Evolution of JASIS’ h-index. Science Focus, 1(1), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A., & Glanzel, W. (2007). A systematic analyse of Hirsch-type indices for journals. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanclay, J. (2008). Ranking forestry journals using the h-index. Journal of informetrics, 2, 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pascal Bador.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bador, P., Lafouge, T. Comparative analysis between impact factor and h-index for pharmacology and psychiatry journals. Scientometrics 84, 65–79 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0058-2

Keywords

Navigation