Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Austrian economics and the mainstream: View from the boundary

  • Symposium: Publishing In Austrian Economics, Part 2
  • Published:
The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention." In Arrow, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., and Gerard Debreu. 1954. "Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy." Econometrica 22:265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backhouse, Roger E. 1995. Interpreting Macroeconomics: Explorations in the History of Macroeconomic Thought. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1997. Truth and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1998a. Explorations in Economic Methodology: From Lakatos to Empirical Philosophy of Science. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —————. 1998b. "If Mathematics is Informal, Perhaps We Should Accept that Economics is Informal Too." Economic Journal 108(6): 1848–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1999. "Modelling Invention: The Use of Models in the Neoclassical Literature on R&D." In Backhouse and Creedy, eds. (1999).

  • Backhouse, Roger E., and John Creedy, eds. 1999. From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honor of D.P O’Brien. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark. 1999. "The Formalist Revolution or What Happened to Orthodox Economics after World War II." In Backhouse and Creedy, eds. (1999).

  • Boettke, Peter J. 1996. "What is Wrong with Neoclassical Economics: And What is Still Wrong with Austrian Economics." In Beyond Neoclassical Economics. Fred Foldvary, ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, Bruce, ed. 1995. "Introduction." In Contra Keynes and Cambridge: Essays, Correspondence. Vol. 9. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, Neil, and Mark Blaug, eds. 1991. Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Research Programmes. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold J. 1969. "Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint." Journal of Law and Economics 11:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberler, Gottfried. 1936. Prosperity and Depression. Geneva: League of Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Alvin H., and H. Tout, 1934. “Annual Survey of Business Cycle Theory: Investment and Saving in Business Cycle Theory.” Econometrica 1:119–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, Daniel M. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4:33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, Werner. 1994. Market Demand: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Abraham, and Neil de Marchi. 1990. Milton Friedman: Economics in Theory and Practice. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Donald N. 1986. The Rhetoric of Economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Mary S., and Malcolm Rutherford, eds. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Annual supplement to History of Political Economy 30.

  • Rizzo, Mario J. 1982. “Mises and Lakatos: A Reformulation of Austrian Methodology.” In Method, Process, and Austrian Economics. Israel M. Kirzner, ed. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Joan. 1933. Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1997. The Logic of Action I: Method, Money, and the Austrian School. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, Paul. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Karen I. 1994. Austrian Economics in America: The Migration of a Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -----. 1990. “The Mengerian Roots of the Austrian Revival.” in Carl Menger and His Legacy in Economics. Bruce J. Caldwell, ed. Annual Supplement to History of Political Economy 22.

  • Weintraub, E. Roy. 1998. “Axiomatisches Missverständniss.” Economic Journal 108(451): 1837–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the University of Birmingham, United Kingdom

    Roger E. Backhouse (professor of economics)

Authors
  1. Roger E. Backhouse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This is a revised version of the paper presented as the Hayek Memorial Lecture at the fifth Austrian Scholars Conference at the Mises Institute on April 16, 1999. I am grateful to Lew Rockwell and the Mises Institute for the invitation. The paper was written whilst holding a British Academy Research Readership and I am grateful to the British Academy for its support.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Backhouse, R.E. Austrian economics and the mainstream: View from the boundary. Quart J Austrian Econ 3, 31–43 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-000-1002-8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12113-000-1002-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation