Abstract
Socio-technical design is now more than 50 years old. It began with the desire of a group of therapists, researchers, and consultants to use more widely the techniques they had developed to assist war damaged soldiers regain their psychological health and return to civilian life. This group, most of whom had been associated with the London Tavistock Clinic before the war and some of whom were medically qualified, believed that the therapeutic tools and techniques they had developed could usefully be applied to the organization of work in industry. They saw this as restricting and degrading many lower rank employees who were forced to spend their days carrying out simple, routine tasks with no possibility of personal development or job satisfaction.
The original version of this chapter was revised: The copyright line was incorrect. This has been corrected. The Erratum to this chapter is available at DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_33
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Adler, N., and Docherty, P. “Bringing Business into Socio-technical Theory,” Human Relations (51: 3 ), 1998, pp. 319 – 345.
Apslund, C., and Otter, C. V. “Codetermination through Collective Effort,” Chapter 12 in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C, L Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Cherns, A. “Principles of Socio-technical Design,” Human Relations (2: 9 ), 1976, pp. 783–792.
Cooper, C. L., and Mumford, E. “Introduction,” in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe. London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Davis, L., and Cherns, A. Quality of Working Life (Volume 2). Free Press of Glencoe. 1975.
Eijnatten, F. M. v., and Zwaan, A. v. d. “The Dutch Approach to Organizational Design: An Alternative Approach to Business Process Reengineering,” Human Relations (51:3), March1998, pp. 289–318.
Eldon, M. “Three Generations of Work Democracy Experiments in Norway: Beyond Classical Socio-technical System Design,” Chapter 11 in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Hill, P., and Emery, F. Towards a New Philosophy of Management. London: Gower Press, 1971.
Hofstedte, G. “Humanization of Work: The Role of Values in a Third Industrial Revolution,” Chapter 12 in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Jacques, E. The Changing Culture of a Factory. London: Tavistock Publications, 1951.
Larson, H. H. “Humanization of the Work Environment in Denmark,” Chapter 7 in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Leminsky, G. “Trade Union Strategies for the Humanization of Work in the FRG,” in Human Choice and Computers, E. Mumford and H. Sackman (eds.). Amsterdam: North Holland, 1975.
Lindholm, R., and Norstedt, J. P. The Volvo Report. Swedish Employers Confederation, 1975.
Moldaschl, M., and Weber, W. G. “The Three Waves of Industrial Group Work: Historical Reflections on Current Research on Group Work,” Human Relations (51:3), March 1998, pp. 347–388.
Mumford, E. “Assisting Work Restructuring in Complex and Volatile Situations,” in Developing Organizational Consultancy, J. E Neumann, K. Kellner, and A. Dawson-Shepherd (eds.). London: Routledge, 1997.
Mumford, E. Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis: The ETHICS Method. London: Macmillan, 1995.
Mumford, E. Ethical Tools for Ethical Change. London: Macmillan, 1996.
Mumford, E. “Risky Ideas in the Risk Society,” Journal of Information Technology (11), 1996, pp. 321–331.
Mumford, E., and Beekman, G. J. Tools for Change and Progress. Amsterdam: CSG Publications, 1994.
Mumford, E., and MacDonald, B. XSEL’s Progress. New York: Wiley, 1989.
Niepce, W., and Molleman, E. “Work Design Issues in Lean Production from a Socio-technical Perspective: Non-Taylorism or the Next Step in Socio-technical Design?” Human Relations (51:3), March 1988, pp. 250–287.
Pasmore, W. A. “ Social Science Transformer: The Socio-technical Perspective,” Human Relations (48:1), January 1985, pp. 1–22.
Rice, A. K. “Productivity and Social Organization in an Indian Weaving Shed,” Human Relations (6), 1953, pp. 297–329.
Rollier, M. “Taylorism and the Italian Unions,” Chapter 10 in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Scott, W., McGivering, I., and Mumford, E. Coal and Conflict. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1963.
Stace, D. A. “Dominant Ideologies, Strategic Change and Sustained Performance,” Human Relations (48:1), January 1995, pp. 553–570.
Trepo, G. “Improvement of Working Conditions and Job Design in France,” in The Quality of Working Life in Western and Eastern Europe, C. L. Cooper and E. Mumford (eds.). London: Associated Business Press, 1979.
Trist, E, and Murray, H. The Social Engagement of Social Science, Volume 2: The Sociotechnical Perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mumford, E. (2000). Socio-Technical Design: An Unfulfilled Promise or a Future Opportunity?. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology. IFIP — The International Federation for Information Processing, vol 41. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35505-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6107-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-35505-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive