Skip to main content
Log in

Movement errors and levels of processing in sentence production

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a corpus of 3,530 slips of the tongue in Spanish, a sample of 753 cases of movement errors was analyzed, comprising those tokens that could be unambiguously assigned to the major categories of anticipations, perseverations, exchanges, and shifts. The analysis was performed according to two main criteria: (a) the degree of correspondence between the linguistic elements interacting in an error, and (b) the distance between such elements in terms of the type and number of the intervening linguistic boundaries. The results of this analysis converge with those obtained in English, supporting a model of sentence planning with different levels of representation and processing. Furthermore, Spanish provides a clear case to attest the role of syllabic structure in production processes, the constraints set by word boundaries in sublexical errors, and the contribution of inflectional suffixes to the assignment of grammatical category to the root morphemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boomer, D.S., & Laver, J.D. (1968). Slips of the tongue.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, B. (1980). Introduction. A brief review of methods of studying language production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production. Vol. 1: Speech and talk (pp. 1–17). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1981). The reliability of speech error data.Linguistics, 19, 561–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1988). The perfect speech error. In L.M. Hyman & C.S. Li (Eds.),Language, speech and mind: Studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell, G.S., & Reich, P.A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • del Viso, S., Igoa, J.M., & García-Albea, J.E. (Eds.). (1987, November),Corpus of spontaneous slips of the tongue in Spanish. (Available from Susana del Viso, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007-Oviedo, Spain.)

  • Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon.Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromkin, V.A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances.Language, 47, 27–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In G.H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 133–177). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production. Vol. 1: Speech and talk (pp. 176–220). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (1984). The organization of processing structure for language production: Applications to aphasic speech. In D. Caplan, A.R. Lecours, & A. Smith (Eds.),Biological perspectives on language (pp. 172–193). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, M.F. (in press). Processes in language production.Cambridge Survey of Linguistics (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • MacKay, D.G. (1971). Stress pre-entry in motor systems.American Journal of Psychology, 84, 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meringer, R. (1908).Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin: Behr Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meringer, R. & Mayer, K. (1895).Versprechen und Verlesen. Stuttgart: Goschensche Verlagsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E.O. (1982).The syntax of words. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.R. (1975).Speech errors and sentence production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.R. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P.F. MacNeilage (Ed.),The production of speech (pp. 109–136). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.R. (1987). The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.),Motor and sensory processes of language (pp. 17–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.R., & Klatt, D.H. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech error data.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger, J.P. (1984). Structural errors in normal and agrammatic speech.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 281–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta, M.L. (1984, June).Morphology and the structure of the mental lexicon. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Psycholinguistics Association, Paris, France.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

García-Albea, J.E., del Viso, S. & Igoa, J.M. Movement errors and levels of processing in sentence production. J Psycholinguist Res 18, 145–161 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069052

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069052

Keywords

Navigation