‘What makes you a scientist is the way you look at things’: ornithology and the observer 1930–1955

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00034-6Get rights and content

Abstract

In the late 1930s networks of amateur observers across Britain were collecting data on birds (British Trust for Ornithology), aircraft (Royal Observer Corps) and society itself (Mass Observation). This paper concentrates on birdwatching practice in the period 1930–1955. Through an examination of the construction of birdwatching's subjects, the Observers, and their objects, birds, it is argued that amateur strategies of scientific observation and record reflected, and were part-constitutive of, particular versions of ecological, national and social identity in this period. The paper examines how conflicts between a rural, organicist Britishness and a modern, planner-preservationist Britishness were elaborated and contained within the figure of the birdwatcher and within the institutional epistemologies of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the British Trust for Ornithology. Such conflicts are shown to be embedded in the structuring of visual perception in different strategies of bird and aircraft identification, particularly between analytic and gestalt methods; the paper examines, using the related ‘field-science’ of aircraft recognition, the importance of identificatory processes in the construction of the Observer, and concludes by examining whether tensions between organicist and scientific discourses were in any sense resolved by the end of this period.

Section snippets

The new birdwatcher

In 1931, Max Nicholson introduced the ‘new birdwatcher’ to the British public. This participant in the ‘new techniques’ of corporate fieldwork, with his ‘new technologies’ of hides, binoculars and rings, was far from the ‘wayward sampler of nature’ of the 1920s.1 No longer a figure ‘who rambles about the countryside . . . like the poet looking for inspiration’,2 Nicholson's new birdwatcher could be ‘distinguished by an acute selectivity of object, and an unerring

‘The British bird’9

Nicholson, with William Alexander and Bernard Tucker, was instrumental in the creation of the British Trust for Ornithology in 1933, ‘a national representative council which would set up a chain of organised bird-watchers to undertake co-ordinated research throughout the British Isles’,

The construction of the observer

Observing was open to all. Its social heterogeneity was repeatedly described, most notably by Fisher, who listed 71 occupations of observers in his fulmar monograph.44 Observation did not require institutional training: its egalitarian nature was stressed. Any ‘fit and proper person of good behaviour’ with an interest in birds was welcomed as a member of the BTO, regardless ‘of the extent of his or her knowledge’. The only stipulation was that observers had ‘the power to

Organicist versus scientist: the battlefield of identification

However, birdwatching did not necessarily create scientists. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds opposed the ‘scientification’ of birdwatching; its journal saw migration studies as ‘unrenumerative and undesirable’, with results ‘merely corroborating facts long and sufficiently well-known’.

A new Romanticism: familiarity through science

Amateur observers could become privileged members of this ‘laboratory’. Konrad Lorenz considered amateur obsessions to be a precondition of field observation, a ‘sustained endeavour accomplished only by those men whose gaze, through a wholly irrational delight in the beauty of the object, stays riveted to it’. Irrational delight in beauty? Science and aesthetics were conjoined in observational practice, allowing James Fisher's bold statement that birdwatching in the 1940s had led to a synthesis

Acknowledgements

I am most grateful to Jim Secord, Jonathan Burt, Anna Mayer, Sarah Wilmot, Nick Jardine and an anonymous referee for their insightful comments on this paper. Thanks also to Ian Dawson at the library of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy, and to Linda Birch at the Alexander Library of the Edward Grey Institute for Field Ornithology, Oxford.

References (88)

  • D.E. Allen

    The naturalist in Britain: A social history

    (1994)
  • Anonymous. (1946). The spitfire notebook. The Aeroplane Spotter, 5(2),...
  • Anonymous. (1947). The Royal Observer Corps. Its history, its purpose and its aim. Inter-Services Aircraft Recognition...
  • Anonymous. (1948). The communications system of the Royal Observer Corps. The Royal Observer Corps Gazette, 2(6),...
  • T.L. Bartlett

    From birds to aeroplanes: Four studies in bird flight for beginners

    (1943)
  • A. Blakemore

    Who sit and watch

    (1946)
  • First Annual Report

    (1935)
  • Second Report

    (1936)
  • Bulletin no. 12: October 1939

    (1939)
  • Bulletin no. 13: October 1940

    (1940)
  • Annual Report

    (1952)
  • H. Buckton

    Forewarned is forearmed: An official tribute to the Royal Observers Corps

    (1993)
  • R. Chislett

    The verification of ornithological sight records

    Bird Notes

    (1949)
  • T.A. Coward

    Bird haunts and nature memories

    (1922)
  • Q. Crauford

    Derelict fairies

    Bird Notes and News

    (1939)
  • A. Darlington

    The use of mobile observers in the study of patterns of migration

    British Birds

    (1951)
  • M.G. Davies

    Junior Bird Recorder's Club: Some notes on bird-watching

    Bird Notes and News

    (1950)
  • R. Durman

    Bird observatories in Britain and Ireland

    (1976)
  • C.S. Elton

    Animal ecology

    (1927)
  • E.A.R. Ennion

    The British bird

    (1943)
  • J. Fisher

    Watching birds

    (1940)
  • J. Fisher

    The birds of Rockall as seen by photographs and observations taken by the Royal Air Force

    British Birds

    (1941)
  • Fisher, J. (1942). The birds of Britain, Britain in Pictures series. London:...
  • Fisher, J. (1948). The last hundred bird books. In The New Naturalist, Autumn issue (pp. 177–178). London:...
  • Fisher, J. (1952). The fulmar, New Naturalist series. London:...
  • R.S.R. Fitter et al.

    Collins pocket guide to British birds

    (1952)
  • B.T. Gates

    Kindred nature: Victorian and Edwardian women embrace the living world

    (1998)
  • C.H. Gibbs-Smith

    A dull article

    Aircraft Recognition

    (1945)
  • J.C. Gent

    Confusion complexes

    Aircraft Recognition

    (1943)
  • T. Hamilton

    Identification: Friend or foe

    (1994)
  • D.W. Hamlyn

    The psychology of perception: A philosophical examination of Gestalt theory and derivative theories of perception

    (1957)
  • Hardy, T. (1976). The darkling thrush. In T. Gibson (Ed.), The complete poems of Thomas Hardy. London:...
  • J.B. Harley

    Deconstructing the map

  • P.A.D. Hollom et al.

    A field guide to the birds of Britain and Europe

    (1954)
  • Huxley, J. (1931). Letter. Bird Notes and News, xiv(8),...
  • J. Huxley

    Bird watching and bird behaviour

    (1949)
  • J. Huxley

    Memories

    (1970)
  • N. Jardine

    Naturphilosophie and the kingdoms of nature

  • F.B. Kirkman

    Bird behaviour: A contribution based chiefly on a study of the black-headed gull

    (1937)
  • K. Koffka

    Principles of Gestalt psychology

    (1935)
  • D. Lack

    The taxonomy of the robin Erithacus rubecula

    British Birds

    (1946)
  • D. Lack

    The position of the Edward Grey Institute, Oxford

    Bird Notes and News

    (1949)
  • Lawrence, C., & Mayer, A.-K. (2000). Regenerating England: Science, medicine and culture in inter-war Britain, Clio...
  • Lockley, R. M. (1948). Bird migration studies in Britain. In The New Naturalist, Autumn issue (pp. 165–171). London:...
  • View full text