Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:46:14.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - INTRODUCTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Suzanne Romaine
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

From Old English to new Englishes: unity in diversity?

The final decades of the eighteenth century provide the starting point for this volume – a time when arguably less was happening to shape the structure of the English language than to shape attitudes towards it in a social climate that became increasingly prescriptive. Baugh and Cable (1993) appropriately entitle their chapter on the period from 1650 to 1800 ‘The Appeal to Authority’, characterising the intellectual spirit of the age as one seeking order and stability, both political and linguistic. This so-called Augustan Age was one of refinement. After two centuries of effort to remedy the perceived inadequacies of English to enable it to meet a continually expanding range of functions, the eighteenth century was a time for putting the final touches on it, to fix things once and for all. In the nineteenth century and early part of the twentieth the success of England as an imperial nation combined with romantic ideas about language being the expression of a people's genius would engender a triumphalist and patriotic attitude to English. The language was now not so much to be improved but preserved as a great national monument and defended from threat in a battle over whose norms would prevail. As the demographic shift in the English-speaking population moved away from Britain, the twentieth would be declared the American century, and the Empire would strike back.

The most radical changes to English grammar had already taken place over the roughly one thousand years preceding the starting year of this volume. Certainly MacMahon's chapter makes clear how in our own period the phonology of English underwent nothing like the series of changes called the Great Vowel Shift (see Lass, volume III). It is noteworthy too that changes affecting morphology are insignificant by comparison with those of previous periods.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1963). Problems and Principles in Language Study. 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, D. (1965). Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le Page, R. B. & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of Identity. Creole-based Approaches to Language and Ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, H. (1864). A Plea for the Queen's English.Google Scholar
Alford, H. (1864). The Queen's English: a Manual of Idiom and Usage. London: Longman and Green.Google Scholar
Algeo, J. & Algeo, A. (1993). Among the new words. American Speech 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (1988a). A computer corpus for a dictionary of Briticisms. In Kytö, Ihalainen & Riissanen, (eds.).Google Scholar
Algeo, J. (1988b). British and American Grammatical Differences. International Journal of Lexicography 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algeo, J. (ed.) (forthcoming). English in North America: origins and development. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. VI. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso. Revised edn.Google Scholar
Ashcroft, B. , Griffiths, G. & Tiffin, H. (1989). The Empire Writes Back Theory and Practice in Post-colonial Literatures. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1968). Mimesis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ayto, J. (1983). English: failures of language reforms. In Fodor, I. & Hagège, C. (eds.), Language Reform. History and Future, vol. I. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag>.Google Scholar
Bailey, C.-J. N. & Maroldt, K. (1977). The French lineage of English. In Meisel, Jürgen (ed.), Pidgins – Creoles – Languages in Contact. Tüingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bailey, R. W. (1991). Images of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Baker, S. J. (1945). The Australian Language. Melbourne: Sun Books.Google Scholar
Baron, D. (1990). The English-Only Question. An Official Language for Americans. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1993). Progress with a Corpus of New Zealand English and some early results. In Souter, C. & Atwell, E. (eds.) Corpus-Based Computational Linguistics. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Baugh, A. C. & Cable, T. (1993). A History of the English Language. 4th edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beier, A. L. & Finlay, R. (eds.) (1986). London 1500–1700. The Making of the Metropolis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1982). This isn't the BBC: colonialism in New Zealand English. Applied Linguistics 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beloff, M. (1938). Public Order and Public Disturbances, 1660– 1714. London.Google Scholar
Bhabha, H. K. (ed.) (1990). Nation and Narration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres. Language 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F. (1992). Translation and the history of English. In Rissanen, , Ihalainen, , Nevalainen, & Taavitsainen, (eds.).Google Scholar
Brathwaite, E. K. (1984). The History of the Voice: the Development of Nation Language in Anglophone Caribbean Poetry. London: New Beacon Books.Google Scholar
Brookman, J. (1993). Britain's lost literary horizons. Times Higher Education Supplement, 12 February.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (1989). The English Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R. W. (ed.) (1994). English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. & Bourne, J. (1988). No common ground: Kingman, Grammar and the Nation. Language and Education 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. 1992. Dialect acquisition. Language 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, R. W. (1932). Oxford English. Society for Pure English, 4, no. 37.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. (ed.) (1992). Pericentric Languages Differing Norms in Different Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cobbett, W. (1818). A Grammar of the English Language. London.Google Scholar
Collins, P. & Peters, P. (1988). The Australian Corpus Project. In Kytö, Ihalainen & Rissanen, (eds.).Google Scholar
Cooper, C. (1995). Noises in the Blood. Orality, Gender, and the ‘Vulgar’ Body of Jamaican Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corfield, P. J. (1991). Class by name and number in eighteenth century Britain. In Corfield, (ed.).Google Scholar
Corfield, P. J. (ed.) (1991). Language, History and Class. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crowley, T. (ed.) (1991). Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daly, M. (1987). Webster's First New Intergalactic Wickedary of the English Language Conjured by Mary Daly in Cahoots with Jane Caputi. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Delbridge, A. (1990). Australian English now. In Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds.), The State of the Language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
,Department of Education and Science (DES) (1985). Education for all. (The Swann Report on the Education of Children from Ethnic Minority Groups) London: HMSO.
,Department of Education and Science (DES) (1988). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of the English Language (The Kingman Report). London: HMSO.
Duff, A. (1990). Once Were Warriors. Auckland: Tandem Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J. (1869). On Early English Pronunciation. London: Early English Text Society.Google Scholar
Enright, D. J. (1989). Tide of pollution that engulfs our language. The Observer 24 December.Google Scholar
Fallon, P. & Mahon, D. (eds.) (1990). The Penguin Book of Contemporary Irish Verse. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. F. & Heath, S. B. (eds.) (1981). Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, H. W. (1906). The Kings English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gates, H. L. Jr. (1992). African American criticism. In Greenblatt, S. & Gunn, G. (eds.) (1992), Redrawing the Boundaries. The Transformation of English and American Literary Studies. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Gerritsen, M. & Stein, D. (eds.) (1992). Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English Phonology. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Graham, G. F. (1869). A Book About Words. Chapter XIII Slang Words and Americanisms. Reprinted in Crowley, T. (ed.) (1991), Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1985). Selections from Cultural Writings. (Eds. Forgacs, D. & Nowell Smith, G. ; trans. Boelhower, W. .) London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Greaves, W. (1989). Selling English by the pound. The Times October 24.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1990). Whose English? In Ricks, C. & Michaels, L. (eds.), The State of the Language. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grillo, R. D. (1989). Dominant Languages. Language and Hierarchy in Britain and France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (1984). Syntactic variation and dialect divergence. Journal of Linguistics 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. (1991). Conservation vs. substratal transfer in Irish English. In Trudgill, & Chambers, (eds.).Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1987). Developing one's Haspirations. Daily Telegraph. December 23.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. (1987). The Age of Empire, 1875–1914. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1995). Glottal stops in New Zealand English: an analysis of variants of word final /t/. Linguistics 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hon, H. H. (1866). Poor Letter H. Its Use and Abuse. London: John F.Shaw and Co. (40th edn.)Google Scholar
Honey, J. (1988). The Language Trap: Race, Class and the ‘Standard Language’ Issue in British Schools. London: National Council for Educational Standards.Google Scholar
Honey, J. (1989). Does Accent Matter? The Pygmalion Factor. Boston: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Hulme, K. (1983). The Bone People. Auckland: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Ihimaera, W. (1987). The Matriarch. Auckland: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. (1986). Third-World literature in the era of multinational capitalism. Social Text 15.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (1755). A Dictionary of the English Language. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (1993). Scottish Standard English in the late eighteenth century. Transactions of the Philological Society 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (1917). An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. (ed.) (1980). The Other Tongue. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kallen, J. L. (1994), English in Ireland. In Burchfield, (ed.).Google Scholar
Kelman, J. (1994). How Late it was, How Late. London: Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Kilpiö, M. (1995). The verb To Be from Old to Early Modern English. In Rissanen, M. et al. (1995), English in Transition. Diachronic Studies in Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kincaid, J. (1996). The Autobiography of My Mother. New York: Farrar Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1967). Abstand languages and Ausbau languages. Anthropological Linguistics 9.Google Scholar
Kloss, H. (1978). Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. (1991). Variation and Diachrony, with Early American English in Focus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kytö, M. , Ihalainen, O. & Rissanen, M. (eds.) (1988). Corpus Linguistics, Hard and Soft. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1991). The boundaries of a grammar: inter-dialectal reactions to positive anymore. In Trudgill, & Chambers, (eds.).Google Scholar
Lass, R. (forthcoming). Phonology and morphology. In Lass, R. (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume III 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leitner, G. (1982). The consolidation of ‘Educated Southern English’ as a model in the early 20th century. International Review of Applied Linguistics 20.Google Scholar
Leitner, G. (1984). Australian English or English in Australia – linguistic identity or dependence in broadcast language. English World Wide 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1988). RP R.I.P. Applied Linguistics 9.CrossRef
Marshall, D. (1982). Industrial England 1776–1851. (2nd edn) London.Google Scholar
Quincey, T. (1890). The English Language. In Masson, D. (ed.), Collected Writings New and Enlarged. 14 vols. Edinburgh. Vol. XIV:.Google Scholar
Matthews, B. (1900). The future literary centre of the English Language. Bookman 12.Google Scholar
McAfee, A. (1994). Judges split as Kelman wins Booker. Financial Times. October 12.Google Scholar
McClure, J. D. (1994). English in Scotland. In Burchfield, (ed.).Google Scholar
McCrum, R. , Cran, W. & MacNeil, R. (1986). The Story of English. New York: Viking Penguin Inc.Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. (1989). The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mencken, H. L. (1919). The American Language. Knopf: New York.Google Scholar
Miller, G. M. (ed.) (1971). BBC Pronouncing Dictionary of English Names. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change, social network, and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. (1992). Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1984). Comprehension and context: successful communication and communicative breakdown. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Applied Sociolinguistics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. G. (1946). The Pronunciation of English in Australia. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Molee, E. (1888). Plea for an American Language, or Germanic-English. Chicago: John Anderson and Company.Google Scholar
Morris, M. (ed.) (1988). Jean Binta Breeze Riddym Ravings and Other Poems. London: Race Today Publications.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (1995). ‘Talking Proper’ The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, J. A. H. (1900). The Evolution of English Lexicography: The Romanes Lecture. Oxford. (1970. College Park, MD: McGrath)Google Scholar
Narogin, Mudrooroo (1990). Writing from the Fringe. A Study of Modern Aboriginal Literature. Melbourne: Hyland House.Google Scholar
Neale, A. V. & Wallis, H. R. E. (eds.) (1955). The Boke of Chyldren by Thomas Phaire. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Newbolt, H. (1921). The teaching of English in England. Extracts reprinted in Crowley, (ed.) (1991).Google Scholar
Nordberg, B. (ed.) (1994). The Sociolinguistics of Urbanisation: The Case of the Nordic Countries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osselton, N. E. (1984). Informal spelling systems in Early Modern English 1500–1800. In Blake, , N. F. & Jones, C. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: Studies in Development. Sheffield: The Centre for English Cultural Tradition and Language.Google Scholar
Paine, T. (1791). The Rights of Man. (ed. Collins, H. . (1969). Harmondsworth: Penguin)Google Scholar
Pedersen, H. (1931). The Discovery of Language: Linguistic Science in the Nineteenth Century. (Trans. Spargo, J. W. (1959). Bloomington: Indiana University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penelope, J. (1990). Speaking Freely. Unlearning the Lies of The Fathers' Tongues. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Phillips, K. C. (1984). Language in Victorian England. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Preisler, B. (1995). Standard English in the world. Multilingua 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R. , Greenbaum, S. , Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramson, W. S. (ed.) (1988). The Australian National Dictionary: a Dictionary of Australianisms in Historical Perspective. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Read, A. W. (1933). British recognition of American speech in the eighteenth century. Dialect Notes 6. (Reprinted in Dillard, J. L. (1980), Social Perspectives on American English. The Hague: Mouton.)Google Scholar
Rissanen, M. , Ihalainen, O. , Nevalainen, T. & Taavitsainen, I. (eds.) (1992). History of Englishes. New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gryuter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1982). Socio-Historical Linguistics. Its Status and Methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984a). The sociolinguistic history of t/d deletion. Folia Linguistica Historica 5.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984b). On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1991). Introduction. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Language in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (1995). Birds of a different feather: Tok Pisin and Hawai'i Creole English as literary languages. The Contemporary Pacific. A Journal of Island Affairs 7.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1996). Internal vs. external factors in socio-historical explanations of change: a fruitless dichotomy? In Ahlers, J. , Bilmes, L. , Guenter, J. S. , Kaiser, B. A. & Namkung, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. General Session and Parasession on Historical Issues in Sociolinguistics/Social Issues in Historical Linguistics. Department of Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1997a). The British heresy in ESL revisited. In Eliasson, S. & Jahr, E. H. (eds.), Language and its Ecology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1997b). Forgetting and remembering: Novels and nations. 11th Pacific History Association Conference and Twenty First Annual University of Hawai'i Pacific Islands Studies Conference. History, Culture and Power in the Pacific. To appear in Ethnohistory.Google Scholar
Rosewarne, D. (1994). Estuary English; Tomorrow's RP?English Today 37.Google Scholar
Ross, A. S. C. (1956). U and non-U Reprinted in Mitford, N. (ed.) (1980). Noblesse Oblige. London: Futura.Google Scholar
Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1921). Language. An Introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, H. (1977). Nations and States. An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Shattuck, J. & Wolff, M. (eds.) (1982). Introduction. The Victorian Periodical Press. Samplings and Soundings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, G. B. (1916). Pygmalion. New York: Brentano.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (1980). Paradigms Lost. Reflections on Literacy and Its Decline. New York: Clarkson N. Potter, Inc.Google Scholar
Singh, G. (ed.) (1983). Collected Essays. D. Q. Leavis. Vol. I: The Englishness of the English Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, L.J. (1994). ‘The prize will be useful. I'm skint’. The Times. October 13.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures: and a second look. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Spender, D. (1980). Man Made Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stead, C. K. (1985). Keri Hulme's The Bone People and the Pegasus Award for Maori Literature. Ariel 16.Google Scholar
Steiner, G. (1975). Why English? Presidential Address delivered to the English Association. London.Google Scholar
Strang, B. M. H. (1970). A History of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1890). A Primer of Spoken English. Oxford.Google Scholar
Treglown, J. (ed.) (1988). The Lantern Bearers and Other Essays by Robert Louis Stevenson. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux.Google Scholar
Trench, D. Richard Chevenix (1855). English Past and Present. Five lectures. London: John W Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. & Hannah, J. (1982). International English. A Guide to Varieties of Standard English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1981). On the limits of passive ‘competence’: sociolinguistics and the polylectal grammar controversy. In Crystal, D. (ed.), Linguistic Controversies: Festschrift for F. R. Palmer. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. & Chambers, J. K. (eds.) (1991). Dialects of English. Studies in Grammatical Variation. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Tulloch, G. (1989). Review of The Good News Bible. Australian Bicentennial Edition. English World Wide 10.Google Scholar
Watt, I. (1957). The Rise of the Novel. Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1788). American Spelling Book. Middletown, CT: William H. Niles. (1831 edn.)Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1789). Dissertations on the English Language. Boston: Thomas.Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1806). A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language. Sidney's Press. (Facsimile edition 1970 edn. by P. P. Gove. Bounty Books.)Google Scholar
Webster, N. (1828). An American Dictionary of the English Language. New York: Converse.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. , Labov, W. , & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions in Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, A. (1973). Sons for the Return Home. Auckland: Longman Paul. (1978).Google Scholar
Wendt, A.Leaves of the Banyan Tree. Auckland: Longman Paul.
Williams, G. A. (1989). Artisans and Sans-Culottes: Popular Movements in France and Britain during the French Revolution. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Willinsky, J. (1994). Empire of Words. The Reign of the OED. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wrightson, K. (1991). Estates, degrees, and sorts: changing perceptions of society in Tudor and Stuart England. In Corfield, (ed.).Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1906). The Place of the Mother Tongue in National Education. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1920). A History of Modern Colloquial English. 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell..Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1927). A Short History of English. 3rd edn. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Wyld, H. C. (1934). The Best English: a Claim for the Superiority of Received Standard English. Society for Pure English, tract 39. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • INTRODUCTION
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • INTRODUCTION
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • INTRODUCTION
  • Edited by Suzanne Romaine, University of Oxford
  • Book: The Cambridge History of the English Language
  • Online publication: 28 March 2008
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521264778.002
Available formats
×