Skip to main content

Utility

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:

Abstract

Utility is a term which has a long history in connection with the attempts of philosophers and political economists to explain the phenomenon of value. It has most frequently been given the connotation of ‘desiredness’, or the capacity of a good or service to satisfy a want, of whatever kind. Its use with that meaning can be traced back at least to Gershom Carmichael’s 1724 edition of Pufendorf’s De Officio Hominis et Civis Iuxta Legam Naturalem, and arguably came down to him through the medieval schoolmen from Aristotle’s Politics.

This chapter was originally published in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition, 2008. Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Bibliography

  • Bowley, M. 1973. Utility, the paradox of value and ‘all that’ and classical economics. In Studies in the history of economic theory before 1870, ed. M. Bowley. London: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Quincey, T. 1844. The logic of political economy. Edinburgh: Blackwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuit, A.J. 1844. On the measurement of the utility of public works. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, 2nd Series, vol. 8. Trans. in International economic papers, No. 2, London: Macmillan, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F.Y. 1899. Utility. In Dictionary of political economy, ed. R.H.I. Palgrave, vol. 3. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gossen, H.H. 1854. Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs und der daraus Fliessenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln. Brunswick: Viewig. Translated as The laws of human relations and the rules of human action derived therefrom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1956. A revision of demand theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R. 1976. ‘Revolutions’ in economics. In Method and appraisal in economics, ed. S.J. Latsis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J.R., and R.G.D. Allen. 1934. A reconsideration of the theory of value. Economica 1 (52–76): 196–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howey, R.S. 1960. The rise of the marginal utility school, 1870–1889. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffé, W. 1973. Léon Walras’s role in the ‘marginal revolution’ of the 1870s. In The marginal revolution in economics, ed. R.D. Collison Black, A.W. Coats, and C.D. Goodwin. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W.S. 1871. The theory of political economy. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauder, E. 1965. A history of marginal utility theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, W.F. 1833. A lecture on the notion of value, delivered before the University of Oxford in Michaelmas Term 1833. Reprinted in Economic history, supplement to the Economic Journal, No. 2 (1927), 168–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of economics, 9th (variorum) ed, ed. C.W. Guillebaud. London: Macmillan, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger, C. 1871. Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre. Trans. J. Dingwall and B.F. Hoselitz as Principles of economics. Glencoe: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J.S. 1848. Principles of political economy, ed. W. J. Ashley. London: Longmans, 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, D.P. 1975. The classical economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A.C. 1912. Wealth and welfare. Expanded and republished as The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. 1817. The principles of political economy and taxation, vol. 1 of The works and correspondence of David Ricardo, ed. P. Sraffa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senior, N.W. 1836. An outline of the science of political economy. London: W. Clowes. Reprinted, London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G.J. 1950. The development of utility theory. Pts. I and II. Journal of Political Economy 58: 307–327; 373–396. Reprinted in G.J. Stigler, Essays in the history of economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. 1925. The utility concept in value theory and its critics. Journal of Political Economy 33: 369–387. Reprinted in J. Viner, The long view and the short. Glencoe: Free Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. 1874. Eléments d’économie politique pure. Lausanne: Corbaz et Cie. Trans. W. Jaffé as Elements of pure economics. London: Allen & Unwin, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Black, R.D.C. (2008). Utility. In: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1320-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1320-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95121-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Utility
    Published:
    16 March 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1320-2

  2. Original

    Utility
    Published:
    21 November 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_1320-1