Abstract
The ideology of American primacy is not new with the Bush administration. Rather it draws upon a long tradition of American exceptionalism. Yet, the unilateralism built into this ideology is not viable as a foundation on which to build a global order, since it assumes that US behaviour is based on broadly-held values and interests, not those of a single state. With the end of the cold war many of the factors that tied the United States to Europe dissolved; moreover, the United States in effect, as its demographic and political centre moved south and west, abandoned many of the values that it shared with Europe. In many ways America's repudiation of multilateralism and welfare capitalism could be seen as a return to the default setting of its founding values. Some analysts argue that Europe faces but two alternative paths in its relationship with the United States — to accept a subservient position, while attempting to broaden Washington's agenda, or a form of ‘Euro-Gaullism’ in which Europe would break free from US domination. In fact, a third, and preferable approach, exists that would be based on strengthening Europe's position vis-à-vis the United States, while working with the United States in those areas where common values and interests exist. There is no doubt that a united Europe has the potential to play a more independent global role if it is willing to create the necessary decision-making structure and deploy its collective resources more efficiently.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ash, T.G. (2004) Free World: Why a Crisis of the West Reveals the Opportunity of Our Time, New York: Random House.
Blair, T. (2002) Speech to Labour Party Conference, 1 October, http://www.labour.org.uk/news/tbconfspeech02.
Brilmayer, L. (1996) American Hegemony: Political Morality in a One-Superpower World, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Bush, G.W. (2002) ‘Introduction’ to The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, September, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.
Calleo, D. (2004) ‘The Broken West’, Survival 46 (3): 498–505.
Dorrien, G. (2004) Imperial Designs: Neoconservatism and the New Pax Americana, Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Ferguson, N. (2004) Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire, New York: Penguin Press.
Financial Times. (2005) ‘Why George Bush should Heed Asia's Central Bankers’, Financial Times, 26 February.
Foner, E. (1998) The Story of American Freedom, New York: W.W. Norton.
Harries, O. (1993) ‘The Collapse of ‘The West’’, Foreign Affairs 72 (4).
Kagan, R. (2003) Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Alfred Knopf.
Krauthammer, C. (1990–1991) ‘The Unipolar Moment’, Foreign Affairs 70 (1).
Lieven, A. (2004) America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lundestad, G. (2003) The United States and Europe Since 1945, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacDougall, W.A. (1997) Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter With The World Since 1776, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Micklethwait, J. and Wooldridge, A. (2004) The Right Nation: Why America is Different, London: Penguin Books.
National Intelligence Council 2020 Project. (n.d.) ‘National Intelligence Council 2020 Project’, Mapping the Global Future, p. 32, http://www.cia.gov/nic/NIC_globaltrend2020.html.
National Security Strategy. (2002) ‘The National Security Strategy of the United States of America’, September, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf.
Nicolaidis, K. (2005) ‘The Power of the Superpowerless’, in T. Lindberg (ed.) Beyond Paradise and Power: Europe, America and the Future of a Troubled Partnership, Oxford, UK: Routledge.
Purdy, J. (2004) Being American: Liberty, Commerce and Violence in an American World, New York: Random House.
Transatlantic Trends. (2004) ‘Transatlantic Trends 2004’, EOS Gallup Europe,http://www.transatlantictrends.org.
US Military Rethinking Two-war Strategy. (2005) ‘US Military Rethinking Two-war Strategy-Officials’, Washington Post, 5 July, http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-yn/content/article/2005/07/05/AR2005070500987_pf.html.
US Strategy Plan. (1992) ‘US Strategy Plan Calls for Insuring No Rivals Develop’, New York Times, 8 March.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The statistics in this appendix are taken from The Pew Global Attitudes Project surveys: Views of a Changing World (June 2003) and A Year After Iraq War (March 2004).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, D. European Foreign Policy and American Primacy. Int Polit 45, 276–291 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2008.4