Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:46:34.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Industrial Meaning of “Gradualism”: The Labour Party and Industry, 1918–1931

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2014

Andrew Thorpe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the period from 1918 until 1931, the British Labour party adhered to the precepts of “gradualism”: incrementally and by degrees, the party would gain support and pass legislation in an inexorable progress toward the socialist millennium. For a while, it seemed that this strategy would carry all before it. Emerging from the First World War with a “socialist” commitment, it became the largest opposition party at the 1918 general election. In 1922 it became the clear opposition to the Conservatives, and Ramsay MacDonald was reelected leader after an eight-year break. A short-lived minority Labour government in 1924 was followed by heavy electoral defeat, but the party was able to form its second minority government in 1929. However, its credibility was destroyed by soaring unemployment, and the ministry collapsed in the summer of 1931 after failing to agree on public expenditure cuts. MacDonald and the chancellor of the Exchequer, Philip Snowden, led a small Labour cohort into a “National” government, which went on to crush Labour at the polls that October. Detailed work on this complex period of Labour's history is hard to find, however. Little work has been done on policy: in particular, it is surprising that, given the party's symbiotic link with trade unionism and the central role of industry in Labour leaders' conception of the transformation to socialism, so little attention has been paid to the party's industrial policy in this period.

Gradualism implied that socialism would emerge from the success of capitalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of British Studies , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 84 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © North American Conference of British Studies 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Snowden, P., Socialism and Syndicalism (London, [1913]), p. 142Google Scholar.

2 Labour Party, Labour and the New Social Order (London, 1918), p. 21Google Scholar (hereafter cited as New Social Order).

3 Garside, W. R., British Unemployment, 1919–1939: A Study in Public Policy (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 211, 91, 143–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Matthews, K. G. P., “Was Sterling Overvalued in 1925?” Economic History Review 39 (1986): 572–87Google Scholar; Redmond, J., “Was Sterling Overvalued in 1925? A Comment,” Economic History Review 42 (1989): 87–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Garside, pp. 143, 230–34, 204; Porter, J. H., “Cotton and Wool Textiles,” in British Industry between the Wars: Instability and Industrial Development, 1919–1939, ed. Buxton, N. K. and Aldcroft, D. H. (London, 1979), pp. 28–33Google Scholar; Committee on Finance and Industry, Minutes of Evidence (London, 1931), q. 8404Google Scholar, Sir James Lithgow (Federation of British Industries); Jones, T., Whitehall Diary, ed. Middlemas, K., 3 vols. (London, 1969), 2:251Google Scholar, H. D. Henderson to Jones, April 7, 1930; Warren, K., “Iron and Steel,” in Buxton, and Aldcroft, , eds., pp. 103, 107, 113Google Scholar.

5 Miller, M. and Church, R. A., “Motor Manufacturing,” pp. 180, 186Google Scholar; Catterall, R. E., “Electrical Engineering,” p. 241Google Scholar; Reader, W. J., “The Chemical Industry,” p. 168Google Scholar; and Harrop, J., “Rayon,” p. 300Google Scholar, all in Buxton and Aldcroft, eds.; Richardson, H. W., Economic Recovery in Britain, 1932–39 (London, 1967)Google Scholar; Booth, A. and Pack, M., Employment, Capital and Economic Policy: Great Britain, 1918–1939 (Oxford, 1985), pp. 3–5Google Scholar.

6 For the capital levy, see Whiting, R. C., “The Labour Party, Capitalism and the National Debt, 1918–24,” in Politics and Social Change in Modern Britain: Essays Presented to A. F. Thompson, ed. Waller, P. J. (Brighton, 1987), pp. 140–60Google Scholar.

7 Labour Party, New Social Order, passim; Labour party National Executive Committee (NEC) minutes, November 13, 1918, National Museum of Labour History, Manchester; Labour Party, Labour's Call to the People (general election manifesto, London, 1918)Google Scholar.

8 Labour Party Annual Report (LPAR), 1923 (London), p. 178; Webb, S. and Webb, B., The Letters of Sidney and Beatrice Webb, ed. Mackenzie, N., 3 vols. (Cambridge, 1978), 3:186Google Scholar, Sidney Webb to W. A. Robson, December 16, 1923.

9 NEC minutes, February 27, 1918; NEC minutes, joint meeting of NEC and parliamentary committee of TUC, April 10, 1918; NEC minutes, December 18, 1918; LPAR, 1923, p. 38; LPAR, 1925, p. 70; LPAR, 1926, p. 63; LPAR, 1927, p. 66; LPAR, 1928, p. 45; LPAR, 1922, p. 4; LPAR, 1924, pp. 47–48.

10 Cole, M. I., The Life of G. D. H. Cole (London, 1971), p. 104Google Scholar.

11 Tawney, R. H., The Acquisitive Society (London, 1921), pp. 14, 75, 89Google Scholar, and The British Labor Movement (New Haven, Conn., 1925), p. 153Google Scholar.

12 Webb, S., National Finance and a Levy on Capital: What the Labour Party Intends (London, 1919), p. 5Google Scholar.

13 Cole, G. D. H., The Next Ten Years in British Economic and Social Policy (London, 1929)Google Scholar; see also Riddell, N. B., “The Age of Cole?” Historical Journal (1995), in pressGoogle Scholar.

14 See, e.g., Jones (n. 4 above), 1:275, March 28, 1924; Webb, B., Beatrice Webb's Diaries, ed. Cole, M. I., 2 vols. (London, 1952–1956), 2:129Google Scholar, January 29, 1927; 1:167, September 24, 1919; 2:230, December 2, 1929.

15 Ibid., 1:167, September 24, 1919.

16 Ibid.; Webb, S. and Webb, B., A Constitution for the Socialist Commonwealth of Great Britain (London, 1920), pp. 168–69Google Scholar; Tawney, p. 123.

17 Hodges, F., “Nationalisation of Industry: The Mines,” in Book of the Labour Party, ed. Tracey, H., 3 vols. (London, 1925), 2:16Google Scholar; Webb, B., Diaries, 1:162Google Scholar, June 23, 1919.

18 LPAR, 1924, pp. 47–48.

19 Cole, G. D. H., Guild Socialism Re-stated (London, 1920), pp. 66–67Google Scholar.

20 Cole, G. D. H., “Principles of Industrial Reconstruction,” in Tracey, , ed., 1:273–74Google Scholar, and Next Ten Years, p. vii.

21 MacDonald, J. R., Socialism: Critical and Constructive (London, [1921]), pp. 278–79Google Scholar; Freeden, M., ed., Minutes of the Rainbow Circle, 1894–1924 (London, 1989), p. 324Google Scholar, minutes of meeting June 14, 1922; LPAR, 1924, p. 151, Morrison; Webb, and Webb, , Constitution, pp. 168–86Google Scholar.

22 Dalton, H., The Capital Levy Explained (London, 1923), p. 52Google Scholar.

23 Jones, 1:284, diary entry, July 7, 1924.

24 Marquand, D., Ramsay MacDonald (London, 1977), p. 282Google Scholar; Boyce, R. W. D., British Capitalism at the Crossroads, 1919–1932: A Study in Politics, Economics, and International Relations (Cambridge, 1987), p. 51Google Scholar.

25 Dalton, , Capital Levy, p. 79Google Scholar; Cronin, J. E., The Politics of State Expansion: War, State and Society in Twentieth-Century Britain (London, 1991), p. 84Google Scholar.

26 Dalton, H., Call Back Yesterday: Memoirs, 1887–1931 (London, 1953), pp. 131–32Google Scholar; Snowden, Philip Viscount, An Autobiography, 2 vols. (London, 1934), 2:595Google Scholar.

27 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday, pp. 138, 140, 143Google Scholar; Snowden, , Autobiography, 2:595Google Scholar.

28 LPAR, 1924, p. 163, W. McNeill (Glasgow trades and Labour council).

29 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday, pp. 173–75Google Scholar; Marquand, pp. 475–77; Public Record Office (PRO), MacDonald papers, 30/69/1753/4, Snowden to MacDonald, October 14, 1927.

30 Lyman, R. W., The First Labour Government, 1924 (London, [1958]), p. 224Google Scholar; PRO, cabinet papers, CAB 23/48/32 (24), cabinet conclusions, May 15, 1924.

31 Jones (n. 4 above), 1:269, diary entry, February 1, 1924; Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday, p. 148Google Scholar.

32 Quoted in Garside (n. 3 above), p. 148.

33 PRO, CAB 23/47/25 (24), cabinet conclusions, April 7, 1924; PRO, CAB 23/48/30 (24), cabinet conclusions, May 7, 1924.

34 Sir A. Balfour and Sir J. Cadman, “Report on the Economic Outlook,” May 1930, quoted in Howson, S. and Winch, D., The Economic Advisory Council, 1930–1939: A Study in Economic Advice during Depression and Recovery (Cambridge, 1977), p. 178CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Miller and Church (n. 5 above), p. 194.

35 PRO, CAB 23/47/17 (24), cabinet conclusions, February 28, 1924; PRO, CAB 23/48/45 (24), cabinet conclusions, July 30, 1924.

36 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday (n. 26 above), p. 158Google Scholar.

37 180 H.C. Deb. 5s., cols. 760–61, 759, February 16, 1925, T. Shaw.

38 LPAR 1925, p. 91; 180 H.C. Deb. 5s., cols. 747–48, February 16, 1925, Dalton.

39 183 H.C. Deb. 5s., cols. 626, 630, May 4, 1925, Snowden; 183 H.C. Deb. 5s., cols. 641–42, May 4, 1925, H. B. Lees-Smith; cols. 659–62, May 4, 1925, F. W. Pethick-Lawrence; Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday, p. 158Google Scholar.

40 183 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 826, May 5, 1925, C. Stephen.

41 Snowden, , Autobiography (n. 26 above), 2:725–26Google Scholar; LPAR, 1925, pp. 45–46, report of standing committee on unemployment, land reform, and emigration.

42 Middlemas, R. K., The Clydesiders: A Left-Wing Struggle for Parliamentary Power (London, 1965), p. 171Google Scholar; Dowse, R. E., Left in the Centre: The Independent Labour Party, 1893–1940 (London, 1966), pp. 212–15Google Scholar; Booth and Pack (n. 5 above), pp. 25–26.

43 Webb, B., Diaries (n. 14 above), 2:121Google Scholar, October 12, 1926.

44 Ibid., p. 127, November 15, 1926, reporting Keynes and H. D. Henderson; for an earlier example, see Freeden, ed. (n. 21 above), pp. 336–37, minutes of meeting, October 10, 1923; for contemporary views of the Industrial Revolution, see, e.g., Hammond, J. L. and Hammond, B., The Town Labourer (London, 1920)Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H., A Short History of the British Working-Class Movement (London, 1925), vol. 1Google Scholar.

45 Buxton, N. K., “Introduction,” in Buxton, and Aldcroft, , eds. (n. 4 above), p. 19Google Scholar.

46 Boyce (n. 24 above), p. 105; Bullock, A., The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, 3 vols. (London, 1960–1983), 3:395–96Google Scholar.

47 Macrosty, H. W., The Trust Movement in British Industry: A Study in Business Organisation (London, 1907)Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., The Conditions of Industrial Peace (London, 1927), p. 16Google Scholar; Meakin, W., The New Industrial Revolution: A Study for the General Reader of Rationalisation and Post-war Tendencies of Capitalism and Labour (London, 1928), p. 200Google Scholar.

48 LPAR, 1928, p. 206, A. Marshall (Central Nottingham D[ivisional] L[abour] P[arty]); pp. 207–8, W. J. Brown; p. 201, J. Maxton; p. 204, R. J. Davies, M.P.; Cole, , Next Ten Years (n. 13 above), p. 417Google Scholar.

49 Labour Party, Labour and the Nation (London, 1928)Google Scholar.

50 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday (n. 26 above), pp. 182–83Google Scholar; Cole, G. D. H., “The Problem of the Mines,” Political Quarterly 1 (1930): 58–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar; LPAR, 1930, p. 225; Buxton, N. K., “Coalmining,” in Buxton, and Aldcroft, , eds., p. 71Google Scholar; Webb, B., Diaries, 2:98Google Scholar, May 18, 1926; PRO, CAB 23/62/28 (29), cabinet conclusions, October 16, 1929; PRO, CAB 23/65/65 (30), October 29, 1930.

51 Garside (n. 3 above), p. 205; Snowden, , Autobiography (n. 26 above), 2:764Google Scholar; Cole, , Next Ten Years, pp. 50, 147Google Scholar.

52 Garside, p. 208; Jones (n. 4 above), 2:265, June 14, 1930.

53 248 H.C. Deb. 5s., cols. 651, 657, February 12, 1931, MacDonald; 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 624, November 3, 1930, Attlee; 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 993, Graham, November 5, 1930.

54 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 815, November 4, 1930, MacDonald.

55 Cole, , Next Ten Years, pp. 45–46Google Scholar; Henderson, H. D., “The Development of New Industries” (1930), in his The Inter-war Years and Other Papers: A Selection from the Writings of Hubert Henderson, ed. Clay, H. (Oxford, 1955), pp. 63–64Google Scholar; Hobson, J. A., “The State as an Organ of Rationalisation,” Political Quarterly 2 (1931): 43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

56 Howson and Winch (n. 34 above), p. 75; Streat, R., Lancashire and Whitehall: The Diary of Sir Raymond Streat, ed. Dupree, M., 2 vols. (Manchester, 1987), 1:28Google Scholar, February 17, 1931; PRO, CAB 58/167, “Committee on New Industrial Development: Report,” June 28, 1932.

57 Henderson, H. D., “Report on the Economic Outlook,” April 1930, quoted in Howson, and Winch, (n. 34 above), pp. 165–74Google Scholar; PRO, CAB 23/65/68 (30), cabinet conclusions, November 17, 1930; LPAR, 1931, p. 83.

58 LPAR, 1922, p. 227, T. Kennedy (Social Democratic Federation); Boyce (n. 24 above), pp. 85–86, 124–25; Miller and Church (n. 5 above), p. 205; Whiting, R. C., The View from Cowley: The Impact of Industrialisation upon Oxford, 1918–1939 (Oxford, 1983), pp. 36–37Google Scholar.

59 Jones, 2:235, January 14, 1930; Thomas, J. H., My Story (London, 1937), p. 176Google Scholar.

60 Dalton, H., The Political Diary of Hugh Dalton, 1918–40, 1945–60, ed. Pimlott, B. (London, 1986), p. 115Google Scholar, June 1, 1930; Jones (n. 4 above), 2:263, June 4, 1930.

61 PRO, CAB 23/64/49 (30), cabinet conclusions, August 6, 1930; PRO CAB 30/69/1753, MacDonald diary, August 14, 1930; Marquand (n. 24 above), pp. 554–55; Garside (n. 3 above), p. 167; PRO, CAB 23/65/50 (30), cabinet conclusions, September 2, 1930.

62 Thorpe, A., The British General Election of 1931 (Oxford, 1991), p. 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Marquand, p. 564; Clegg, H. A., A History of British Trade Unionism, vol. 2, 1911–1933 (Oxford, 1985), p. 502Google Scholar; see also Dalton, , Political Diary, p. 124, October 23, 1930Google Scholar.

63 See, e.g., 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 820, MacDonald, November 4, 1930; Howson and Winch, p. 78.

64 Thorpe, p. 70.

65 Dalton, , Call Back Yesterday (n. 26 above), p. 148Google Scholar; Jones, 2:257, May 19, 1930; Webb , B., Diaries (n. 14 above), 2:248–49, August 3, 1930Google Scholar.

66 Skidelsky, R., Sir Oswald Mosley (London, 1975)Google Scholar; University of Warwick, Modern Records Centre, MSS 78/ASW/4/1/10, Amalgamated Society of Woodworkers, 71st Annual Report, 1930, p. v.

67 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 165, Hartshorn, October 29, 1930.

68 MacDonald to Montagu Norman (governor of Bank of England), June 18, 1930, quoted in Marquand, p. 603.

69 “The Limits of Insular Socialism” (1930), in Henderson, , Inter-war Years (n. 55 above), p. 38Google Scholar.

70 Committee on Finance and Industry (n. 4 above), qq. 8450–59, Lithgow (FBI); Thorpe, pp. 40–41, 61–62; Streat (n. 56 above), 1:30, February 18, 1931.

71 LPAR, 1928, p. 229, Snowden; Jones (n. 4 above), 2:257, May 19, 1930; Kent Archives Office, Thomas papers, U1625/C134, Thomas to Snowden, October 24, 1929.

72 LPAR, 1930, p. 185, Bevin.

73 Jones, 1:257, May 19, 1930; PRO, CAB 23/63/6 (30), cabinet conclusions, February 3, 1930; 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 161, Hartshorn, October 29, 1930; 248 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 740, Thomas, February 12, 1931.

74 MacDonald (n. 21 above), pp. 83, 999, 101, 152–53; Cole, , Next Ten Years (n. 13 above), pp. 126–29Google Scholar; LPAR, 1927, p. 208.

75 TUC, Congress Report, 1928, p. 229Google Scholar.

76 LPAR, 1928, p. 213, John Wheatley; Middlemas (n. 42 above), p. 221.

77 TUC, Congress Report, 1928, p. 440Google Scholar, A. G. Tomkins (Furnishing Trades Association).

78 Ibid., p. 437, A. J. Cook (Miners' Federation of Great Britain); pp. 428–29, G. Hicks (Amalgamated Union of Building Trade Workers).

79 See MacDonald's comments in Jones, 2:228, December 16, 1929.

80 Kirby, M. W., The British Coalmining Industry, 1870–1946: A Political and Economic History (London, 1977), p. 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dalton, , Political Diary (n. 60 above), pp. 95–96Google Scholar, June 3–9, 1930; 244 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 527, November 3, 1930, Graham.

81 PRO, CAB 23/64/32 (30), cabinet conclusions, June 18, 1930; PRO, CAB 58/132, “Report of the Committee on the Cotton Industry,” July 4, 1930, pp. 18–21Google Scholar; PRO, CAB 23/65/57 (30), cabinet conclusions, September 30, 1930; Streat (n. 56 above), 1:30–31, February 18, 1931.

82 Jones (n. 4 above), 2:263, June 3, 1930; PRO, CAB 23/64/40 (30), cabinet conclusions, July 11, 1930; PRO, CAB 23/64/46 (30), cabinet conclusions, July 30, 1930; PRO, CAB 23/66/16 (31), cabinet conclusions, March 4, 1931.

83 234 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 101, Mosley, January 21, 1930; Jones, 2:257, May 19, 1930.

84 Thomas (n. 59 above), pp. 178–79.

85 Porter, p. 40.

86 Kirby, p. 150; Fine, B., The Coal Question: Political Economy and Industrial Change from the Nineteenth Century to the Present Day (London, 1990), p. 31Google Scholar; Buxton, , “Coalmining” (n. 50 above), p. 71Google Scholar; Supple, B., The History of the British Coalmining Industry, vol. 4, The Political Economy of Decline (Oxford, 1987), p. 301Google Scholar; Snowden, , Autobiography (n. 26 above), 2:771Google Scholar.

87 Buxton, , “Introduction” (n. 45 above), pp. 19–20Google Scholar; Clegg (n. 62 above), 2:425.

88 Howson and Winch (n. 34 above), p. 46; Streat, 1:30, February 18, 1931.

89 Jones, 2:263 and 270, June 4 and July 10, 1930.

90 PRO, CAB 58/132, “Report of the Committee on the Cotton Industry,” July 4, 1930, p. 20Google Scholar.

91 Streat (n. 56 above), 1:15, January 23, 1931.

92 “The Problems of British Industry: Memorandum by the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster,” July 29, 1930, quoted in Harris, K., Attlee (London, 1984), pp. 570–84Google Scholar; Dalton, , Political Diary (n. 60 above), pp. 129–30Google Scholar, November 14, 1930; Howson and Winch, pp. 44–45, 387. For earlier suggestions along similar lines, see, e.g., Freeden, ed. (n. 21 above), p. 297, minutes, January 14, 1920.

93 237 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 2721, April 15, 1930, Thomas, ; Banker (March 1930), p. 364Google Scholar.

94 LPAR, 1929, p. 227, Snowden; Dalton, , Political Diary, p. 104, May 1, 1930Google Scholar; Hudson, J., “The Birth and Death of Firms in England and Wales during the Inter-war Years,” Business History 31 (1989): 102–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 LPAR, 1930, p. 195, E. F. Wise, M.P.; p. 202, Mosley; Howson and Winch, p. 79.

96 Jones (n. 4 above), 2:220–22, December 9, 1929; Committee on Finance and Industry (n. 4 above), q. 4621, Pugh, May 2, 1930; cf. Pugh, A., Men of Steel (London, 1952), p. 454Google Scholar.

97 Clegg (n. 62 above), 2:490–91.

98 234 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 19, Thomas, January 21, 1930; 244, col. 162, Hartshorn, October 29, 1930; col. 992, Graham, November 5, 1930; Warren (n. 4 above), p. 118; for the pensions fiasco, see Dalton, , Political Diary, p. 107, May 13, 1930Google Scholar.

99 234 H.C. Deb. 5s., col. 1616, J. J. McShane, February 3, 1930.

100 See, e.g., LPAR, 1922, p. 97; PRO, CAB 23/48/34 (24), cabinet conclusions, May 27, 1924; Hodges (n. 17 above), p. 13; Labour Party, Labour and the Nation, p. 23Google Scholar.

101 Skidelsky, R., Politicians and the Slump: The Labour Government of 1929–1931 (London, 1967), p. 395Google Scholar.

102 Brady, R. A., The Rationalization Movement in German Industry: A Study in the Evolution of Economic Planning (New York, 1933), pp. 416–18Google Scholar.

103 For an early example, see Cole, G. D. H., British Trade and Industry: Past and Future (London, 1932), pp. 434–35Google Scholar.