Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T07:57:45.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Human Nature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

David L. Hull
David L. Hull*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Generations of philosophers have argued that all human beings are essentially the same, that is, they share the same nature, and that this essential similarity is extremely important. Periodically philosophers have proposed to base the essential sameness of human beings on biology. In this paper I argue that if ‘biology’ is taken to refer to the technical pronouncements of professional biologists, in particular evolutionary biologists, it is simply not true that all organisms that belong to Homo sapiens as a biological species are essentially the same. If ‘characters’ is taken to refer to evolutionary homologies, then periodically a biological species might be characterized by one or more characters which are both universally distributed among and limited to the organisms belonging to that species, but such states of affairs are temporary, contingent, and relatively rare.

Type
Part I. Presidential Address
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1986 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1986 , 1986 , pp. 3 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dupré, John (1986) “Sex, Gender, and Essence.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11: 441-457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Leon. (1972) “The Human Nature of Human Nature.” Science 176:123-128.10.1126/science.176.4031.123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1986) “Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, or Why History Matters.” American Scientist 74: 60-69.Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. and Manners, R. A. (1972) Culture Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. and Wilson., E. O. (1986) “Moral Philosophy as Applied Science: A Darwinian Approach to the Foundations of Ethics.” Philosophy 61:173-192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar