Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T14:45:25.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party, Performance, and Strategic Politicians: The Dynamics of Elections for Senator and Governor in 2006

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Adam R. Brown  and
Gary C. Jacobson
Adam R. Brown
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Gary C. Jacobson
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we analyze a unique set of state-level monthly survey data covering the eighteen months preceding the 2006 election to estimate (1) the relative effects of national and local conditions on the strength of challenges to incumbent senators and governors and (2) the effects of these challenges on incumbent popularity and, ultimately, vote shares. The analysis confirms several of the basic components of the theory that the strategic behavior of candidates and campaign contributors amplifies the effects of local and national conditions on election results, thereby enhancing electoral accountability. But it also uncovers a striking difference between the two offices. Even taking the strongly pro-Democratic national climate into account, the election context had a strong tendency to reduce the approval ratings of Senators, while it had an equally strong tendency to increase the approval ratings of governors. We speculate as to what might account for this difference.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter 2008 , pp. 384 - 409
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randal W.. 1995. “Economic and Referendum Voting: A Comparison of Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 89:99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Partin, Randal W.. 2001. “Candidate Advertisements, Media Coverage, and Citizen Attitudes: The Agendas and Roles of Senators and Governors in a Federal System.” Political Research Quarterly 54:795–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Cohen, Richard E.. 2007. The Almanac of American Politics 2008. Washington, D.C. National Journal.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., Covington, Cary, and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. “Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 47:510–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, Jon R., Fleisher, Richard, and Talbert, Jeffrey C.. 1997. “Partisan Differences in Candidate Quality in Open Seat House Races, 1976–1994.” Political Research Quarterly 50:281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Adam R. 2007. “Gubernatorial Approval and Strategic Entry in the 2006 Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 2–15.Google Scholar
Brown, Adam R. 2008. “Strategic Politicians in Gubernatorial Elections.” Ph.D. Diss. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Brown, Adam R., and Jacobson, Gary C.. 2007. “Party, Performance, and Strategic Politicians: The Dynamics of Elections for Senator and Governor in 2006.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, August 30-September 2.Google Scholar
Canon, David T. 1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37:1119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Wright, Gerald C.. 1998. “State and National Factors in Gubernatorial and Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 42:994–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubb, John. 1988. “Institutions, the Economy, and the Dynamics of State Elections.” American Political Science Review 82:133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Linda L., and McClure, Robert D.. 1989. Political Ambition: Who Decides to Run for Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan. 1998. “Estimating the Effect of Campaign Spending on Senate Election Outcomes Using Instrumental Variables.” American Political Science Review 92:401–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook-Provow, Thomas. 1987. “National Factors in Gubernatorial Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 15:471–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1985. “Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections.” Public Choice 47:7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83:773–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2006. “Polarized Opinion in the States: Partisan Differences in Approval Ratings of Governors, Senators, and George W. Bush.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 20–23.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 7th ed. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Kim Fridkin. 1995. “Characteristics of Press Coverage in Senate and Gubernatorial Elections: Information Available to Voters.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazee, Thomas A., ed. 1994. Who Runs for Congress: Ambition, Context, and Candidate Emergence. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. 5th ed. New York, NY: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition, and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Leyden, Kevin, and Borrelli, Stephen. 1995. “The Effect of State Economic Conditions on Gubernatorial Elections: Does Unified Government Make a Difference?” Political Research Quarterly 48:275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lublin, David Ian. 1994. “Quality, not Quantity: Strategic Politicians in U.S. Senate Elections, 1952–1990.” The Journal of Politics 56:228–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, Cherie D., Fulton, Sarah, Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter J.. 2006. “When to Risk It? Institutions, Ambitions, and the Decision to Run for the House.” American Political Science Review 100:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisel, L. Sandy, and Stone, Walter P.. 1997. “Determinants of Candidate Emergence in U.S. House Elections: An Exploratory Study.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Stanley, Harold W., and Vogel, Ronald J.. 1995. “State Economies and State Taxes: Do Voters Hold Governors Accountable?” American Journal of Political Science 39:936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1989. “Challengers in U.S. Senate Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 14:531–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Challenger Profile and Gubernatorial Elections.” Western Political Quarterly 45:125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Fastnow, Christina. 1994. “Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47:705–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, Robert M. 1990. “Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism.” The Journal of Politics 52:29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidmarch, Charles M., Hyman, Lisa J., and Sorkin, Jill E.. 1984. “Press Issue Agendas in the 1982 Congressional and Gubernatorial Election Campaigns.” The Journal of Politics 46:1226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westlye, Mark C. 1991. Senate Elections and Campaign Intensity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar