Abstract
This paper presents an acoustic description of the nine Azerbaijani vowels; investigating the underlying acoustic and temporal characteristics of its vowel system. We explored acoustic and temporal parameters including: the first three formants (F1, F2 and F3), fundamental frequency (F0) and duration of the vowels. Participants in this study were 20 male and 23 female Azerbaijani speakers with a Tabrizi dialect. They were asked to utter three repetitions of the nine Azerbaijani vowels in three natural word contexts, embedded in carrier sentences. Results showed that the [ɯ] and [œ] vowels had a large overlap in the F1–F2 vowel space. Further analysis suggested that F3 is an important cue in discrimination of this vowel pair. Vowel-intrinsic duration effect seemed to be relatively strong in Azerbaijani. Other universal features also were found in the production of Azerbaijani vowels: low vowels and female speakers had lower F0 values. Surprisingly, in contrast with previous results for most languages, the average duration of Azerbaijani vowels was greater in males than females. The results of this study define the acoustic vowel-space of the Azerbaijani language and develop a database for further comparisons and investigations.
References
Adank, P., R. Van Hout and R. Smits. 2004. “An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch”. Journal of the A coustical Society of America?,. 1729-1738.10.1121/1.1779271Search in Google Scholar
Bezooijen, R. van. 1995. “Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women.” Language and Speech 38. 253-266.10.1177/002383099503800303Search in Google Scholar
Best, C.T. and A. Faber. 2000. “Developmental increase in infants discrimination of normative vowels that adults assimilate to a single native vowel”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Infant Studies, Brighton, UK, 16-19 July 2000.Search in Google Scholar
Boersma, P and D. Weenink. 2015. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.10, retrieved 27 Jun 2015 from <http://www.praat.org/>.Search in Google Scholar
Clopper, C.G., D. Pisoni and K. De Jong. 2005. “Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 3. 1661-1676.10.1121/1.2000774Search in Google Scholar
Crystal, D. 2010. The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Diehl, R.L., B. Lindblom, K.A. Hoemeke and R.P. Fahey. 1996. “On explaining certain male-female differences in the phonetic realization of vowel categories”. Journal of Phonetics 24. 187-208.10.1006/jpho.1996.0011Search in Google Scholar
Escudero, P., P. Boersma, A.S. Rauber and R.A. Bion. 2009. “A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 3. 1379-1393.10.1121/1.3180321Search in Google Scholar
Hagino, A., K. Inohara, Y.I. Sumita and H. Taniguchi. 2008. “Investigation of the factors influencing the outcome of prostheses on speech rehabilitation of mandibulec-tomy patients”. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi 52(4). 543-549.10.2186/jjps.52.543Search in Google Scholar
Hillenbrand, J., L. Getty, M. J. Clark and K. Wheeler. 1995. “Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 5. 3099-3111.10.1121/1.411872Search in Google Scholar
Johanson, L. 1988. “Code-copying in Irano-Turkic”. Language Sciences 20(3). 325-337.10.1016/S0388-0001(98)00007-2Search in Google Scholar
Johanson, L. 2010. “Azerbaijanian”. In: Brown, K and S. Ogilvie (ed.), Concise encyclopedia of languages of the world. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 110-113.Search in Google Scholar
Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. J. 1980. Vowel contrast reduction, an acoustic and perceptual study of Dutch vowels in various speech conditions. (PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.)Search in Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Menges, K.H. 1951. “Research in the Turkic dialects of Iran: preliminary report”. Oriens 4(1). 273-279.10.1163/1877837251X00687Search in Google Scholar
Mozaffarzadeh Peivasti, S. 2012. “An acoustic analysis of Azerbaijani vowels in Tabrizi dialect”. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 2(7). 7181-7184.Search in Google Scholar
Peterson, G.E. and H.L. Barney. 1952. “Control methods used in a study of the vowels”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2. 175-184.10.1121/1.1906875Search in Google Scholar
Prieto, P, and F. Torreira. 2007. “The segmental anchoring hypothesis revisited: Syllable structure and speech rate effects on peak timing in Spanish”. Journal of Phonetics 35(4). 473-500.10.1016/j.wocn.2007.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Reetz, H. and A. Jongman. 2011. Phonetics: Transcription, production, acoustics, and perception. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar
Reubold, U., J. Harrington and F. Kleber. 2010. “Vocal aging effects on F0 and the first formant: a longitudinal analysis in adult speakers”. Speech Communication 52(7). 638-651.10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.012Search in Google Scholar
Rochet, A. andB.L. Rochet. 1991. “The effect ofvowel height on patterns of assimilation nasality in French and English”. Proceedings of the 12th Int. Cong. Phonetic Sciences, Aix (vol. 3). 54-57.Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, A.P. 2001. “Dynamic consequences of differences in male and female vocal tract dimensions”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 5. 2153-2164.10.1121/1.1356020Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, A.P. “Gender-specific articulatory-acoustic relations in vowel sequences”. Journal of Phonetics 30(3). 417-435.10.1006/jpho.2002.0171Search in Google Scholar
Simpson, A.P. and C. Ericsdotter. 2003. “Sex-specific durational differences in English and Swedish”. Proceedings of the 15th Int. Cong. Phonetic Sciences, 2003. 1113—1116.Search in Google Scholar
Strange, W., A. Weber, E.S. Levy, V. Shafiro, M. Hisagi and K. Nishi. 2007. “Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects”. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2. 1111-1129.10.1121/1.2749716Search in Google Scholar
Wang, H. and V. Van Heuven. 2006. “Acoustical analysis of English vowels produced by Chinese, Dutch and American speakers”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 237-248.10.1075/avt.23.23wanSearch in Google Scholar
Whalen, D.H. and A.G. Levitt. 1995. “The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels”. Journal of Phonetics 3. 349-366.10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0Search in Google Scholar
© Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
