Historical Rhetorics/Should We Read Quintilian?: Difference between revisions
| [unreviewed revision] | [unreviewed revision] |
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 3018046 by Bob (mistake made in formatting the annotation. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 73:
*[[/Nash Smith, Jessica. “(Dis)membering Quintilian’s Corpus: Ramus Reads the Body Rhetoric.”/]] ''Exemplararia'' 11.2 (1999): 399-429. Print.
*Leigh, Matthew. "Quintilian on the Emotions." ''Journal of Roman Studies'' 94: 122-140. Print.
*
*[[/Walzer, Arthur. "Moral Philosophy and Rhetoric in the Institutes: Quintilian on Honor and Expediency." ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly'' 36.3 (2006): 263. Print./]]
*Ward, John. "Cicero and Quintilian." ''The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, III: The Renaissance'' (1999): 77. Print.
*Walzer, Arthur. “Quintilian’s ‘Vir Bonus’ and the stoic wise man.” ''Rhetoric Society Quarterly'' 33.4 (2003): 25 - 41. Print.
{{BookCat}}
| |||