New York City: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

25 April 2024

24 April 2024

23 April 2024

22 April 2024

  • curprev 08:5808:58, 22 April 2024Dadude sandstorm talk contribs 383,170 bytes +45 Again, all that his image did was use a cropped version of the inferior image you used to replace a long standing status quo image which was of higher technical quality. not having a high amount of lighting doesn't make it darker, as the ambient light is higher and the newer image solely focuses on the foreground whilst completely obscuring the background. again, why do you insist on engaging in edit wars instead of just taking it to the talk page? Tag: Undo

21 April 2024

  • curprev 23:3123:31, 21 April 2024Castncoot talk contribs 383,125 bytes −45 Let’s simply roll it back to Nikon21’s edit, as you’ve reverted two ediitors now. Let Nikon21, a photography expert, pursue the better of the two. The image you prefer appears dark such that the only visuals are of the Empire State Bldg, One WTC, and the Hudson River, without really showing other buildings properly. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
  • curprev 15:0215:02, 21 April 2024Dadude sandstorm talk contribsm 383,170 bytes +5 No edit summary Tag: Reverted
  • curprev 14:5814:58, 21 April 2024Dadude sandstorm talk contribs 383,165 bytes +40 Not quite sure what that first comment has to do with your change. It's standard practice that when you get reverted back after a contested edit, not to engage in edit wars, and instead discuss it on the talk page. Either way, the status quo image is a far superior option. I won't be reverting again as I don't want to engage in edit wars and I suggest you do the same, and instead bring up the issue on the talk page. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 14:4514:45, 21 April 2024Castncoot talk contribs 383,125 bytes −40 Just started editing Wikipedia less than one month ago? Let’s let Nikon21 take care of the leading lede picture, they have extensive experience with NYC photography. Tags: Undo Reverted
  • curprev 14:0014:00, 21 April 2024Dadude sandstorm talk contribs 383,165 bytes +40 Reverted change of lede image to the status quo. Please discuss your change in the Talk Page before making such radical changes. Furthermore, the newer image you've used is in fact less clear, is a night-time (and thus inferior) image and is thus less desirable than the excellent quality older image Tags: Undo Reverted

19 April 2024

18 April 2024

16 April 2024

15 April 2024

14 April 2024

13 April 2024

12 April 2024

9 April 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)