Wikipedia:Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement draft guidelines review: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
reply |
→General comments: Oppose |
||
Line 298:
* An observation: A collaborative online project where people are told that if they show "signs of problematic behaviour", they may be subject to "punishments" is not a safe space. [[User:Vexations|Vexations]] ([[User talk:Vexations|talk]]) 14:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' as mentioned immediately above my comment, this is extremely problematic to consider "punishments" on an online global community of contributors who are not employees or volunteers governed by the Wikipedia Foundation. The increased presence of a "stateness" and authoritarianism in this community as contributors being below and under the watchful eye of many oversights, and IMO the addition of a "Code Enforcement Officer" is only detrimental to a [[WP:5P|pillar of Wikipedia]] – specifically "Wikipedia is not [...] an experiment in anarchy or democracy". In addition, detrimental to overall morale and willingness for new editors and admins to enter the community. Our policies and guidelines are already well enforced by admins and arbitration committees. WMF needs to seriously consider that it is a support for WP, and the fact that multiple comments have reiterated the points I've mentioned should be concerning. <span style="color:#CD0000">[[User:Waddie96|waddie96]] ★ ([[User talk:Waddie96|talk]])</span> 18:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
*'''Oppose''' Convoluted and bureaucratic processes to enforce a badly drafted policy that does not have community support. As someone who has stopped contributing as a result of the manner in which WMF has usurped the community's self governance, this enforcement proposal only serves to solidify my view that things are moving in wrong direction. <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:WJBscribe|WJBscribe]] [[User talk:WJBscribe|(talk)]]</strong> 15:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||