The Battle of Marj Dābiq
: مرج دابق
, meaning "the meadow of Dābiq"; Turkish
: Mercidabık Muharebesi
) was a decisive military engagement in Middle Eastern history
, fought on 24 August 1516, near the town of Dabiq
, 44 km north of Aleppo
The battle was part of the 1516–17 war
between the Ottoman Empire
and the Mamluk Sultanate
, which ended in an Ottoman victory and conquest of much of the Middle East, bringing about the destruction of the Mamluk Sultanate. The Ottoman victory in this battle gave Selim's armies control of the entire region of Syria
and opened the door to the conquest of Egypt.
Leaving Al-Ashraf Tuman bay II
in control of Cairo
the sultan and his army marched north with great pomp, accompanied by music, singing, and festivity. The host included fifteen high ranking Emirs of a Thousand, 5,000 of his own royal Mamluks, and militia conscripts, and was supplemented during the march by additional Syrian and Bedouin contingents.[page needed]
High officers of state, the Abbasidcaliph Al-Mutawakkil III
, and courtiers
, together with muezzins
, physicians, and musicians, followed in his train.[page needed]
On the way, al-Ghawri also received Ahmed, son of the late pretender to the Ottoman throne (Selim I
's nephew), and brought him along with courtly honors in the hope of drawing over his sympathizers from the Ottoman
Advancing slowly Al-Ashraf Qansuh al-Ghawri
on 9 June,
with carpets spread in his pathway, while European merchants scattered gold to the crowd. After a few days' stay, advancing at a leisurely pace, he was received at Homs
with festivities, moving towards Aleppo
Portrait of Al-Ashraf Qansuh al-Ghawri, by Paolo Giovio
Meanwhile, another embassy arrived from the Ottoman camp which, under the pretense of peace, brought lavish presents to the Sultan
, the Caliph Al-Mutawakkil III
, and his vizier
. These gifts were accompanied by a request from Selim I
for a supply of Egyptian sugar and confectionery.[page needed]
The envoy intimated that problems with the Shah
of Persia Ismail I
had forced him again to prepare for war and take the field.[page needed]
Mughla Bey was sent back with counter-gifts, but by the time he reached the Ottoman camp, Selim I
had thrown off his ruse of peace. The Ottomans scorned the embassy and sent the chancellor back with his head and beard shaved and riding a lame mount.
Betrayal in the Mamluk camp
, the Mamluk governor Khai'r Bey
had secretly sided with the Porte
. Though the governor of Damascus
had disclosed this to the sultan, he discredited the information. To veil his treachery, Khai'r Bey gave al-Ghawri a splendid reception, but the inhabitants were enraged against the Mamluks
by their behavior in the city.
It was at this point that Mughla Bey made his miserable return, reporting that Selim and his forces were advancing against them. With this immediate threat thrust upon them, the emirs, qadis, and royal Mamluks renewed their oaths of loyalty to the sultan. Al-Ghawri also distributed gifts to his personal forces, which displeased the other Mamluks.
The sultan, dissuaded by the emir Janberdi al-Ghazali, ignored a final warning about Khai'r Bey's disloyalty before taking to the field.
The Mamluk army advanced and on 20 August made camp at the plain of Marj Dabiq
, a day's journey north of Aleppo
. There, al-Ghawri and his men awaited the enemy's approach on this plain, where the sultanate's fate would soon be decided.
According to the History of Egypt composed by Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Iyas
, the Mamluks arranged themselves with the Sultan occupying the center column. Sibay, the Governor of Damascus, commanded the right flank, and Khai'r Bey, governor of Aleppo, took the left.
The marshal Sûdûn Adjami was the first to enter combat, followed by Sibay, leading an experienced corps of veteran Mamluk warriors. They rushed into battle and managed to kill several thousand Turkish soldiers in the first hours of fighting. This advantage forced the opposite Ottoman wing to begin a withdrawal, and the Mamluk forces under Sibay succeeded in taking several pieces of artillery and capturing some fusiliers. Selim considered retreat or requesting a truce.
It was at this point that the battle turned against the Mamluks. A rumor began to spread that al-Ghawri had ordered the recruits to hold their position, avoid combat, and leave the fighting to the veteran soldiers who were already engaged in battle. When Marshall Sûdûn Adjami and Sibay, who were leading the attack, were suddenly killed, panic broke out in the Mamluks' advancing right flank. Meanwhile, Khai'r Bey, in command of the left flank, called for a retreat. The fact that his forces were the first to quit the field was considered evidence of the man's betrayal.
Ibn Iyas offered the following account of the Mamluk defeat:
The battle between the Ottoman and Mamluk armies.
The sultan stood under his standard and called to his soldiers: "Aghas
! This is the moment to take heart! Fight, and I will reward you!" But no one listened and the men fled from the battle. "Pray to God to give us victory!" Called al-Ghawri. This is the moment for prayer." But he found neither support nor defenders. He then began to feel an unquenchable fire. This was a particularly hot day, and an unusual fog of dust had risen between the armies. It was the day of God's anger directed against the Egyptian army, which stopped fighting. At the worst moment, and with the situation growing worse, the emir Timur Zardkash feared for the safety of the battle standard, lowered and stowed it, then came to find the sultan. He said to him: "Lord Sultan, the Ottoman army has defeated us. Save yourself and flee to Aleppo." When the sultan realized this, he was gripped by a sort of paralysis that affected the side of his body, and his jaw dropped open. He asked for water, which was brought to him in a golden goblet. He drank some, turned his horse to flee, advanced two paces, and fell from his saddle. After that, little by little, he surrendered his soul.
Accounts vary, however, as to how exactly Al-Ashraf Qansuh al-Ghawri
met his end.
Khai'r Bey may have spread a report of his death to precipitate the Egyptians' rout. According to one version of the battle, the sultan was found alive on the field and his head cut off and buried to prevent its falling into the enemy's hands. The Ottoman account relates that he was beheaded by a Turkish soldier, whom Selim initially insisted on executing but later pardoned.
The Egyptian historian Ibn Iyas, by comparison, wrote that there were some who said he had died of a ruptured gallbladder and others who said he had poisoned himself.
, welcomed by the inhabitants as a deliverer from the excesses of the Mamluks
, entered Aleppo
He received the Abbasid caliph warmly, but upbraided the Islamic judges and jurists for their failure to check Mamluk
misrule. Joined by Khai'r Bey and other Egyptian officers, he proceeded to the Citadel
he marched with his forces to Damascus
, where terror prevailed. Beyond some attempts to protect the city by flooding the plain around, the remnants of the Mamluk forces had done nothing substantial to oppose the enemy. Discord amongst the emirs had paralyzed the army, preventing any decisive action that might have affected the subsequent course of events.
Some of al-Ghawri's lieutenants supported the emir Janberdi Al-Ghazali as the new sultan, while others favored the deceased ruler's son.
As the Ottomans
approached, however, resistance dissolved as remaining forces either went over to the Turkish side or fled to Egypt
. Selim I
entered Damascus in mid-October, and the inhabitants readily surrendered to the conquerors.
Ottoman control, despite being jeopardized by periodic revolts, was to last almost three centuries.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Muir, William (1896). The Mameluke; Or, Slave Dynasty of Egypt, 1260–1517, A. D. Smith, Elder. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ a b (Petry 2008, p. 498)
- ^ Ирмияева 2000.
- ^ Петросян 2013.
- ^ Emecen, Feridun. "MERCİDÂBIK MUHAREBESİ" (PDF). Retrieved 27 November 2020. (in Turkish)
- ^ (Hawting 2005, p. 76)
- ^ (Waterson 2007, p. 281)
- ^ a b c Ibn Iyas, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Wiet, Gaston (ed.). Journal d'un Bourgeois du Caire. p. 67.
Last edited on 4 May 2021, at 22:17
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.