is the practice of having a legislature
divided into two separate assemblies
, chambers, or houses, known as a bicameral legislature
. Bicameralism is distinguished from unicameralism
, in which all members deliberate and vote as a single group. As of 2015, about 40% of world's national legislatures are bicameral, and about 60% are unicameral.
Often, the members of the two chambers are elected or selected by different methods, which vary from country to country. This can often lead to the two chambers having very different compositions of members.
of primary legislation
often requires a concurrent majority
—the approval of a majority of members in each of the chambers of the legislature. When this is the case, the legislature may be called an example of perfect bicameralism.
However, in many parliamentary and semi-presidential systems, the house to which the executive is responsible
can overrule the other house and may be regarded as an example of imperfect bicameralism
. Some legislatures lie in between these two positions, with one house able to overrule the other only under certain circumstances.
History of bicameral legislatures
The British Parliament is often referred to as the Mother of Parliaments
(in fact a misquotation of John Bright
, who remarked in 1865 that "England is the Mother of Parliaments") because the British Parliament
has been the model for most other parliamentary systems, and its Acts
have created many other parliaments.
The origins of British bicameralism can be traced to 1341, when the Commons met separately from the nobility and clergy for the first time, creating what was effectively an Upper Chamber and a Lower Chamber, with the knights and burgesses sitting in the latter. This Upper Chamber became known as the House of Lords
from 1544 onward, and the Lower Chamber became known as the House of Commons
, collectively known as the Houses of Parliament
Many nations with parliaments have to some degree emulated the British "three-tier" model. Most countries in Europe and the Commonwealth
have similarly organised parliaments with a largely ceremonial head of state
who formally opens and closes parliament, a large elected lower house, and (unlike Britain) a smaller upper house.
The Founding Fathers of the United States
also favoured a bicameral legislature. The idea was to have the Senate be wealthier and wiser. Benjamin Rush saw this though, and noted that "this type of dominion is almost always connected with opulence". The Senate was created to be a stabilising force, not elected by mass electors, but selected by the State legislators. Senators would be more knowledgeable and more deliberate—a sort of republican nobility—and a counter to what James Madison
saw as the "fickleness and passion" that could absorb the House.
He noted further that "The use of the Senate is to consist in its proceeding with more coolness, with more system and with more wisdom, than the popular branch." Madison's argument led the Framers to grant the Senate prerogatives in foreign policy, an area where steadiness, discretion, and caution were deemed especially important.
State legislators chose the Senate, and senators had to possess significant property to be deemed worthy and sensible enough for the position. In 1913, the 17th Amendment
passed, which mandated choosing Senators by popular vote rather than State legislatures.
As part of the Great Compromise
, the Founding Fathers invented a new rationale for bicameralism in which the Senate had an equal number of delegates per state, and the House had representatives by relative populations.
Rationale for bicameralism and criticism
A formidable sinister interest may always obtain the complete command of a dominant assembly by some chance and for a moment, and it is therefore of great use to have a second chamber of an opposite sort, differently composed, in which that interest in all likelihood will not rule.
— Walter Bagehot
, "The English Constitution", in Norman St John-Stevas, ed., The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot
, London, The Economist, vol. 5, pp. 273–274.
There have been a number of rationales put forward in favour of bicameralism. Federal states
have often adopted it, and the solution remains popular when regional differences or sensitivities require more explicit representation, with the second chamber representing the constituent states. Nevertheless, the older justification for second chambers—providing opportunities for second thoughts about legislation—has survived.
For states considering a different constitutional arrangement that may shift power to new groupings, bicameralism could be demanded by currently hegemonic groups who would otherwise prevent any structural shift (e.g. military dictatorships, aristocracies).
The growing awareness of the complexity of the notion of representation and the multi-functional nature of modern legislatures may be affording incipient new rationales for second chambers, though these do generally remain contested institutions in ways that first chambers are not. An example of political controversy regarding a second chamber has been the debate over the powers of the Senate of Canada
or the election of the Senate of France
The relationship between the two chambers varies: in some cases, they have equal power, while in others, one chamber is clearly superior in its powers. The first tends to be the case in federal systems and those with presidential governments. The second tends to be the case in unitary states with parliamentary systems
. There are two streams of thought: critics believe bicameralism makes meaningful political reforms more difficult to achieve and increases the risk of gridlock—particularly in cases where both chambers have similar powers—while proponents argue the merits of the "checks and balances
" provided by the bicameral model, which they believe help prevent ill-considered legislation.
Communication between houses
Formal communication between houses is by various methods, including: Sending messages
Formal notices, such as of resolutions
or the passing of bills, usually done in writing, via the clerk
of each house.Transmission
of bills or amendment to bills requiring agreement from the other house.Joint session
a plenary session
of both houses at the same time and place.Joint committees
which may be formed by committees of each house agreeing to join, or by joint resolution of each house. The United States Congress
has conference committees
to resolve discrepancies between House and Senate versions of a bill, similar to "Conferences" in Westminster parliaments.Conferences
Conferences of the Houses of the English (later British) Parliament met in the Painted Chamber
of the Palace of Westminster
Historically there were two distinct types: "ordinary" and "free". The British Parliament last held an ordinary conference in 1860—its elaborate procedure yielding to the simpler sending of messages. A free conference resolves a dispute through "managers" meeting less formally in private. The last free conference at Westminster was in 1836 on an amendment to the Municipal Corporations Act 1835
the previous one had been in 1740—with not much more success than ordinary conferences, the free type yielded to the greater transparency of messages.
In the Parliament of Australia
there have been two formal conferences, in 1930 and 1931, but many informal conferences.
As of 2007 the "Conference of Managers" remains the usual procedure for dispute resolution in the Parliament of South Australia
In the Parliament of New South Wales
in 2011, the Legislative Assembly
requested a free conference with the Legislative Council
over a bill on graffiti; after a year the Council refused, describing the mechanism as archaic and inappropriate.
The two houses of the Parliament of Canada
have also used conferences, but not since 1947 (although they retain the option).
Examples of bicameralism at the national level
Some countries, such as Argentina
, Bosnia and Herzegovina
, and the United States
, link their bicameral systems to their federal
In the United States, Australia, Brazil, Mexico and Nepal for example, each state or province is given the same number of seats in one of the houses of the legislature, despite variance between the populations of the states or provinces. This is intended to ensure that smaller states are not overshadowed by larger states, which may have more representation in the other house of the legislature.
Canada's elected lower house, the House of Commons
, comprises Members of Parliament (MPs) from single-member "ridings" based mainly on population (updated every 10 years using Census data). The Commons is democratically elected every four years (constitutionally up to five years). In contrast, in Canada's upper house
, Senators are appointed to serve until age 75 by the Governor General
on the advice
of the Prime Minister
The Government (i.e. executive) is responsible to and must maintain the confidence of the elected House of Commons. Although the two chambers formally have many of the same powers, this accountability clearly makes the Commons dominant—determining which party is in power, approving its proposed budget and (largely) the laws enacted. The Senate primarily acts as a chamber of revision: it almost never rejects bills passed by the Commons but does regularly amend them; such amendments respect each bill's purpose, so they are usually acceptable to the Commons. Occasionally, the two houses cannot come to an agreement on an amendment, which results in rare instances of a key Government bill failing.
The Senate's power to investigate issues of concern to Canada can raise their profile (sometimes sharply) on voters' political agendas.
Unlike upper houses in most Westminster parliamentary systems
, the Australian Senate is vested with significant power, including the capacity to block legislation initiated by the government in the House of Representatives, making it a distinctive hybrid of British Westminster bicameralism
and US-style bicameralism. As a result of proportional representation, the chamber features a multitude of parties vying for power. The governing party or coalition, which must maintain the confidence of the lower house, rarely has a majority in the Senate and usually needs to negotiate with other parties and Independents to get legislation passed.
In German, Indian, and Pakistani systems, the upper houses (the Bundesrat
, the Rajya Sabha
, and the Senate
respectively) are even more closely linked with the federal system, being appointed or elected directly by the governments or legislatures of each German
or Indian state
, or Pakistani province
. This was also the case in the United States before the Seventeenth Amendment
was adopted. Because of this coupling to the executive branch
, German legal doctrine does not treat the Bundesrat
as the second chamber of a bicameral system formally. Rather, it sees the Bundesrat
and the Bundestag
as independent constitutional bodies. Only the directly elected Bundestag
is considered the parliament.
In the German Bundesrat
, the various Länder
have between three and six votes; thus, while the less populated states have a lower weight, they still have a stronger voting power than would be the case in a system based proportionately on population, as the most populous Land
currently has about 27 times the population of the least populous
. The Indian upper house does not have the states represented equally, but on the basis of their population.
There is also bicameralism in countries that are not federations, but have upper houses with representation on a territorial basis. For example, in South Africa, the National Council of Provinces
(and before 1997, the Senate
) has its members chosen by each Province
In Spain the Senate
functions as a de facto
territorially based upper house, and there has been some pressure from the Autonomous Communities
to reform it into a strictly territorial chamber.
The European Union
maintains a somewhat close to bicameral legislative system consisting of the European Parliament
, which is elected in elections on the basis of universal suffrage, and the Council of the European Union
, which consists of one representative for each Government of member countries, who are competent for a relevant field of legislation. Though the European Union has a highly unusual character in terms of legislature, one could say that the closest point of equivalency lies within Bicameral legislatures.
The European Union is considered neither a country nor a state, but it enjoys the power to address national Governments in many areas.
Aristocratic and post-aristocratic
In a few countries, bicameralism involves the juxtaposition of democratic and aristocratic elements.
House of Lords of the United Kingdom
The House of Lords chamber
The best known example is the British House of Lords
, which includes a number of hereditary peers
. The House of Lords is a vestige of the aristocratic system that once predominated in British politics, while the other house, the House of Commons
, is entirely elected. Over the years, some have proposed reforms to the House of Lords, some of which have been at least partly successful. The House of Lords Act 1999
limited the number of hereditary peers (as opposed to life peers
, appointed by the Monarch
on the advice of the Prime Minister
) to 92, down from around 700. Of these 92, one is the Earl Marshal
, a hereditary office always held by the Duke of Norfolk
, one is the Lord Great Chamberlain
, a hereditary office held by turns, currently by the Marquess of Cholmondeley
, and the other 90 are elected by all sitting peers
. Hereditary peers elected by the House to sit as representative peers sit for life; when a representative peer dies, there is a by-election to fill the vacancy. The power of the House of Lords to block legislation is curtailed by the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949
. Peers can introduce bills except Money Bills, and all legislation must be passed by both Houses of Parliament
. If not passed within two sessions, the House of Commons
can override the Lords′ delay by invoking the Parliament Act
. Certain legislation, however, must be approved by both Houses without being forced by the Commons under the Parliament Act
. These include any bill that would extend the time length of a Parliament, private bills, bills sent to the House of Lords less than one month before the end of a session, and bills that originated in the House of Lords.
Life Peers are appointed either by recommendation of the Appointment Commission (the independent body that vets non-partisan peers, typically from academia, business or culture) or by Dissolution Honours, which take place at the end of every Parliamentary term when leaving MPs may be offered a seat to keep their institutional memory. It is traditional to offer a peerage to every outgoing Speaker of the House of Commons.
Until 2009, 12 Lords of Appeal in Ordinary
sat in the House as the highest court in the land; they subsequently became justices of the newly created Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
. As of 16 February 2021, 803 people sit in the House of Lords, with 92 Hereditary Peers, 26 Lords Spiritual and 685 Life Peers. Membership is not fixed and decreases only on the death, retirement or resignation of a peer.
Japan's former House of Peers
Some bicameral legislatures have chambers that meet in different buildings, at different parts of the city. Here, France's upper house called the Senate
meet in the Luxembourg Palace
(top), while the lower house, the National Assembly
, meets at the Palais Bourbon
On the other hand, in Italy
consists of two chambers that have the same role and power: the Senate
(Senate of the Republic, commonly considered the upper house
) and the Chamber of Deputies
(considered the lower house
). The main difference among the two chambers is the way the two chambers are composed: the deputies, in fact, are elected on a nationwide basis, whilst the members of the Senate are elected on a regional basis: this may lead to different majorities among the two chambers because, for example, a party may be the first nationally but second or third in some regions. Considering that in the Italian Republic the Government needs to win confidence votes in both the chambers, it may happen that a Government has a strong majority (usually) in the Chamber of Deputies and a weak one (or no majority at all) in the Senate. This has led sometimes to legislative deadlocks, and has caused instability in the Italian Government.
Indirectly elected Upper Houses (France, Ireland, Netherlands)
In some of these countries, the upper house is indirectly elected. Members of France's Senate
and Ireland's Seanad Éireann
are chosen by electoral colleges
, the latter's consisting of members of the lower house, local councillors, the Taoiseach
, and graduates of selected universities, while the Netherlands' Senate
is chosen by members of provincial assemblies (who, in turn, are directly elected).
Semi-bicameral (Hong Kong, Northern Ireland; earlier in Norway, the Netherlands)
In Hong Kong
, members of the unicameral Legislative Council returned from the democratically-elected geographical constituencies and partially democratic functional constituencies
are required to vote separately since 1998 on motions, bills or amendments to government bills not introduced by the government. The passage of these motions, bills or amendments to government motions or bills requires double majority in both groups simultaneously. (Before 2004, when elections to the Legislative Council from the Election Committee
was abolished, members returned through the Election Committee vote with members returned from geographical constituencies.) The double majority requirement does not apply to motions, bills and amendments introduced by the government
Examples of bicameralism in subnational entities
When the Australian states were founded as British colonies in the 19th century, they each had a bicameral Parliament. The lower house was traditionally elected based on the one-vote-one-value principle, with universal male suffrage, later expanded to women, whereas the upper house was either appointed on the advice of the government or elected, with a strong bias towards country voters and landowners. After Federation
, these became the state Parliaments. In Queensland, the appointed upper house
was abolished in 1922, while in New South Wales
there were similar attempts at abolition, before the upper house
was reformed in the 1970s to provide for direct election.
Bosnia and Herzegovina
The Legislature of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
, one of the two entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina
, is a bicameral legislative body. It consists of two chambers. The House of Representatives has 98 delegates, elected for four-year terms by proportional representation. The House of Peoples has 58 members, 17 delegates from among each of the constituent peoples of the Federation, and 7 delegates from among the other peoples. Republika Srpska
, the other entity, has a unicameral parliament, known as the National Assembly
but there is also a Council of Peoples who is de facto
other house of legislative.
The German federal state of Bavaria
had a bicameral legislature from 1946 to 1999, when the Senate
was abolished by a referendum amending the state's constitution. The other 15 states have used a unicameral system since their founding.
Of the 28 states and 8 Union Territories of India, only 6 states - Andhra Pradesh
and Uttar Pradesh
- have bicameral legislatures, while the rest all have unicameral legislatures. The lower houses are called Legislative Assemblies
, and their members are elected by universal adult suffrage from single-member constituencies in state elections, which are normally held every five years. In the six states with bicameral legislatures, the upper house is called the Legislative Council
), one-third of whose members are elected every two years. Members of Legislative Council are elected in various ways:
From 1956 to 1958 the Andhra Pradesh Legislature was unicameral. In 1958, when the State Legislative Council was formed, it became bicameral until 1 June 1985 when it was abolished. This continued until March 2007 when the State Legislative Council was reestablished and elections were held for its seats. In Tamil Nadu
, a resolution was passed on 14 May 1986 and the state's Legislative Council was dissolved on 1 November 1986. Again on 12 April 2010, a resolution was passed to reestablish the council, but was ultimately unsuccessful. Similarly, the states of Assam
, Jammu and Kashmir
, Madhya Pradesh
, and West Bengal
have also dissolved the upper houses of their state legislatures
Under Soviet regime
regional and local Soviets
were unicameral. After the adoption of 1993 Russian Constitution
bicameralism was introduced in some regions. Bicameral regional legislatures are still technically allowed by federal law but this clause is dormant now. The last region to switch from bicameralism to unicameralism was Sverdlovsk Oblast
During the 1930s, the Legislature of the State of Nebraska was reduced from bicameral
to unicameral with the 43 members that once comprised that state's Senate. One of the arguments used to sell the idea at the time to Nebraska voters was that by adopting a unicameral system, the perceived evils of the "conference committee
" process would be eliminated.
A conference committee is appointed when the two chambers cannot agree on the same wording of a proposal, and consists of a small number of legislators from each chamber. This tends to place much power in the hands of only a small number of legislators. Whatever legislation, if any, the conference committee finalizes is presented in an unamendable "take-it-or-leave-it" manner by both chambers.
During his term as governor
of the State of Minnesota
, Jesse Ventura
proposed converting the Minnesotan legislature to a single chamber with proportional representation
, as a reform that he felt would solve many legislative difficulties and impinge upon legislative corruption. In his book on political issues, Do I Stand Alone?
, Ventura argued that bicameral legislatures for provincial and local areas were excessive and unnecessary, and discussed unicameralism as a reform that could address many legislative and budgetary problems for states.
A 2005 report
on democratic reform in the Arab world by the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations
co-sponsored by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright
urged Arab states to adopt bicameralism, with upper chambers appointed on a 'specialized basis'. The Council claimed that this would protect against the 'Tyranny of the majority
', expressing concerns that without a system of checks and balances extremists would use the single chamber parliaments to restrict the rights of minority
In 2002, Bahrain
adopted a bicameral system with an elected lower chamber and an appointed upper house. This led to a boycott of parliamentary elections that year by the Al Wefaq
party, who said that the government would use the upper house to veto their plans. Many secular critics of bicameralism were won around to its benefits in 2005, after many MPs in the lower house voted for the introduction of so-called morality police
on introducing a unicameral Parliament instead of the current bicameral Parliament
was held in Romania
on 22 November 2009. The turnout rate was 50.95%, with 77.78% of "Yes" votes for a unicameral Parliament.
This referendum had a consultative role, thus requiring a parliamentary initiative and another referendum to ratify the new proposed changes.
This section needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (July 2019)
on a new constitution
was held on 30 October 2016. The constitution draft would create a bicameral Parliament
instead of the current unicameral. The Senate
is expected to represent the interests of territorial collectivities and Ivoirians living abroad. Two thirds of the Senate is to be elected at the same time as the general election. The remaining one third is appointed by the president elect.
Note : The map is slightly outdated, with Mauritania being unicameral since 2018, and with Egypt and Turkmenistan being bicameral respectively since 2020 and 2021.
Nations with a bicameral legislature.
Nations with a unicameral legislature.
Nations with a unicameral legislature and an advisory body.
Nations with no legislature.
- ^ "IPU PARLINE database: Structure of parliaments". www.ipu.org. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
- ^ Seidle, F. Leslie; Docherty, David C. (2003). Reforming parliamentary democracy. McGill-Queen's University Press. p. 3. ISBN 9780773525085.
- ^ Julian Go (2007). "A Globalizing Constitutionalism?, Views from the Postcolony, 1945-2000". In Arjomand, Saïd Amir (ed.). Constitutionalism and political reconstruction. Brill. pp. 92–94. ISBN 978-9004151741.
- ^ "How the Westminster Parliamentary System was exported around the World". University of Cambridge. 2 December 2013. Retrieved 16 December 2013.
- ^ a b c "The Constitutional Background - House of Representatives archives". Archived from the original on 30 July 2015. Retrieved 28 July 2015.
- ^ (in French) Liberation.fr, Sénat, le triomphe de l'anomalie
- ^ a b "Chapter 21: Relations with the House of Representatives". Odgers' Australian Senate Practice (14th ed.). Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
- ^ Jones, Clyve (2014). "Accommodation in the Painted Chamber for Conferences between the Lords and the Commons from 1600 to 1834". Parliamentary History. 33 (2): 342–357. doi:10.1111/1750-0206.12100. ISSN 0264-2824.
- ^ Blayden 2017 p.6; "Free Conference—Municipal Corporations' Act Amendment (, )". Hansard. 11 August 1836. HC Deb vol 35 cc1125–7. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
- ^ Blayden 2017 p.6; "Managers for the Free Conference, on the Bill to prevent Commerce with Spain". House of Lords Journal. British History Online. 22–24 April 1740. Volume 25, pp.518–526. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
- ^ a b Blayden, Lynsey (September 2017). "Do free conferences have a place in the present-day NSW Parliament?" (PDF). Australasian Study of Parliament Group. Retrieved 19 February 2018.
- ^ Crump, Rick (Spring 2007). "Why the conference procedure remains the preferred method for resolving disputes between the two houses of the South Australian Parliament". Australasian Parliamentary Review. 22 (2): 120–136. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.611.7131.
- ^ "Papers on Parliament No. 34 Representation and Institutional Change: 50 Years of Proportional Representation in the Senate". 1999. Retrieved 23 February 2017.
- ^ According to the Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfGE 37, 363, Aktenzeichen 2 BvF 2, 3/73
- ^ European Union Politics, John McCormick, 3rd Edition
- ^ How do you become a Member of the House of Lords? - UK Parliament. Parliament.uk (21 April 2010). Retrieved on 2013-07-12.
- ^ "Italian constitutional reforms: Towards a stable and efficient government". ConstitutionNet.
- ^ "Minerva". Minerva.
- ^ Malamud, Andrés and Martín Costanzo (2010) "Bicameralismo subnacional: el caso argentino en perspectiva comparada". In: Igor Vivero Ávila (ed.), Democracia y reformas políticas en México y América Latina (pp. 219-246). Mexico: M. A. Porrúa.
- ^ "Australia's Upper Houses - ABC Rear Vision". Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 7 September 2020.
- ^ Dunstan, Don (1981). Felicia: The political memoirs of Don Dunstan. Griffin Press Limited. pp. 214–215. ISBN 0-333-33815-4.
- ^ "Role and History of the Legislative Assembly". Parliament of New South Wales. Archived from the original on 23 April 2011. Retrieved 9 September 2014.
- ^ Electoral Reform expected to alter balance of power, The Australian, 11 June 1987, p.5
- ^ Constitution (Parliamentary Reform) Act 2003
- ^ Griffith, Gareth; Srinivasan, Sharath (2001). State Upper Houses in Australia (PDF). New South Wales Parliamentary Library Service.
- ^ Constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina
- ^ "About National Assembly - NSRS". www.narodnaskupstinars.net.
- ^ "Home page". vijecenarodars.net (in Serbian).
- ^ Article 171, Clause 3 of the Constitution of India (1950)
- ^ "2005 report" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 July 2008.
- ^ Referendum turnout 50.95%. 77.78 said YES for a unicameral Parliament, 88.84% voted for the decrease in the number of ParliamentariansArchived 21 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Official results from the Romanian Central Electoral Commission
- ^ "Innovations of the Draft Constitution of Cote d'Ivoire: Towards hyper-presidentialism?". ConstitutionNet.
- ^ "Constitution of Nepal" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 December 2015. Retrieved 18 February 2016.
Last edited on 9 May 2021, at 10:17
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.