The Coptic alphabet
is the script used for writing the Coptic language
. The repertoire of glyphs
is based on the Greek alphabet
augmented by letters borrowed from the Egyptian Demotic
and is the first alphabetic script used for the Egyptian language
. There are several Coptic alphabets, as the Coptic writing system may vary greatly among the various dialects and subdialects of the Coptic language
The letters of the Coptic Alphabet.
The Coptic alphabet has a long history, going back to the Hellenistic
period, when the Greek alphabet was used to transcribe Demotic
texts, with the aim of recording the correct pronunciation of Demotic
. During the first two centuries of the Common Era
, an entire series of spiritual texts were written in what scholars term Old Coptic
, Egyptian language texts written in the Greek alphabet
. A number of letters, however, were derived from Demotic
, and many of these (though not all) are used in "true" Coptic writing. With the spread of Christianity
in Egypt, by the late 3rd century, knowledge of hieroglyphic
writing was lost, as well as Demotic
slightly later, making way for a writing system more closely associated with the Christian church
. By the 4th century, the Coptic alphabet was "standardised", particularly for the Sahidic dialect. (There are a number of differences between the alphabets as used in the various dialects in Coptic.) Coptic is not generally used today except by the members of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria
to write their religious
texts. All the Gnostic
codices found in Nag Hammadi
used the Coptic alphabet.
The Coptic alphabet was the first Egyptian writing system to indicate vowels
, making Coptic documents invaluable for the interpretation of earlier Egyptian texts. Some Egyptian syllables had sonorants
but no vowels; in Sahidic, these were written in Coptic with a line above the entire syllable. Various scribal schools made limited use of diacritics: some used an apostrophe as a word divider
and to mark clitics
, a function of determinatives
Egyptian; others used diereses
over ⲓ and ⲩ to show that these started a new syllable, others a circumflex
over any vowel for the same purpose.
The Coptic alphabet's glyphs are largely based on the Greek alphabet, another help in interpreting older Egyptian texts,
with 24 letters of Greek origin; 6 or 7 more were retained from Demotic
, depending on the dialect (6 in Sahidic, another each in Bohairic and Akhmimic).
In addition to the alphabetic letters, the letter ϯ stood for the syllable /te/ or /de/.
As the Coptic alphabet is simply a typeface
of the Greek alphabet,
with a few added letters, it can be used to write Greek without any transliteration schemes. Latin equivalents would include the Icelandic alphabet
(which likewise has added letters), or the Fraktur
alphabet (which has distinctive forms). While initially unified with the Greek alphabet by Unicode
, a proposal was later accepted to separate it, with the proposal noting that Coptic is never written using modern Greek letter-forms (unlike German, which may be written with Fraktur or Roman Antiqua
letter-forms), and that the Coptic letter-forms have closer mutual legibility with the Greek-based letters incorporated into the separately encoded Cyrillic alphabet
than with the forms used in modern Greek.
These are the letters that are used for writing the Coptic language.
- ^ The upper line of s connected with t to distinguishes it from the standalone "s" and "t"
- ^ Akhmimic dialect uses the letter Ⳉ ⳉ for /x/. No name is recorded.
Letters derived from Demotic
In Old Coptic, there were a large number of Demotic
Egyptian characters, including some logograms. They were soon reduced to half a dozen, for sounds not covered by the Greek alphabet. The following letters remained:
, most Coptic letters formerly shared codepoints with similar Greek
letters, but a disunification was accepted for version 4.1, which appeared in 2005. The new Coptic block is U+2C80 to U+2CFF. Most fonts
contained in mainstream operating systems
use a distinctive Byzantine style for this block. The Greek block includes seven Coptic letters (U+03E2–U+03EF highlighted below) derived from Demotic, and these need to be included in any complete implementation of Coptic.
Diacritics and punctuation
These are also included in the Unicode specification.
- Normal English punctuation (comma, period, question mark, semicolon, colon, hyphen) uses the regular Unicode codepoints for punctuation
- Dicolon: standard colon U+003A
- Middle dot: U+00B7
- En dash: U+2013
- Em dash: U+2014
- Slanted double hyphen: U+2E17
These are codepoints applied after that of the character they modify.
- Combining overstroke: U+0305 (= supralinear stroke)
- Combining character-joining overstroke (from middle of one character to middle of the next): U+035E
- Combining dot under a letter: U+0323
- Combining dot over a letter: U+0307
- Combining overstroke and dot below: U+0305,U+0323
- Combining acute accent: U+0301
- Combining grave accent: U+0300
- Combining circumflex accent (caret shaped): U+0302
- Combining circumflex (curved shape) or inverted breve above: U+0311
- Combining circumflex as wide inverted breve above joining two letters: U+0361
- Combining diaeresis: U+0308
Macrons and overlines
Coptic abbreviations use U+0305 ◌̅ COMBINING OVERLINE
to draw a continuous line across the remaining letters of an abbreviated word.
It extends from the left edge of the first letter to the right edge of the last letter. For example, ⲡ̅ⲛ̅ⲁ̅
A different kind of overline uses U+FE24 ◌︤COMBINING MACRON LEFT HALF
, U+FE26 ◌︦COMBINING CONJOINING MACRON
, and U+FE25◌︥ COMBINING MACRON RIGHT HALF
to distinguish the spelling of certain common words or to highlight proper names of divinities and heroes.
For this the line begins in the middle of the first letter and continues to the middle of the last letter. A few examples: ⲣ︤ⲙ︥
Coptic numerals are indicated with letters of the alphabet such as ⲁ
Sometimes numerical use is indicated with a continuous line above using U+0305 ◌̅ COMBINING OVERLINE
as in ⲁ͵ⲱ̅ⲡ̅ⲏ̅
for 1,888 (where "ⲁ͵
" is 1,000 and "ⲱ̅ⲡ̅ⲏ̅
" is 888). Multiples of 1,000 can be indicated by a continuous double line above using U+033F ◌̿ COMBINING DOUBLE OVERLINE
as in ⲁ̿
- ^ a b Ritner, Robert Kriech. 1996. "The Coptic Alphabet". In The World's Writing Systems, edited by Peter T. Daniels and William Bright. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. 1994:287–290.
- ^ Campbell, George L. "Coptic." Compendium of the World's Writing Systems. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Biddles LTD, 1991. 415.
- ^ "Coptic". Ancient Scripts. Retrieved 2 December 2017.
- ^ Everson, Michael; Mansour, Kamal (2002-05-08). "L2/02-205 N2444: Coptic supplementation in the BMP" (PDF).
- ^ For example: The composer's name "Dmitri Dmitriyevich Shostakovich" is Дмитрий Дмитриевич Шостакович in Cyrillic, and Ⲇⲙⲏⲧⲣⲓⲓ Ⲇⲙⲏⲧⲣⲓⲉⲃⲓϭ Ϣⲟⲥⲧⲁⲕⲟⲃⲓϭ in Coptic.
- ^ Peust (1999.59-60)
- ^ a b Peust (1999)
- ^ Before the Greco-Bohairic reforms of the mid 19th century.
- ^ "The Coptic Language" (PDF). Coptic Orthodox Diocese of the Southern United States.
- ^ "Revision of the Coptic block under ballot for the BMP of the UCS" (PDF). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2. 2004-04-20.
- ^ a b c Everson, Michael; Emmel, Stephen; Marjanen, Antti; Dunderberg, Ismo; Baines, John; Pedro, Susana; Emiliano, António (2007-05-12). "N3222R: Proposal to add additional characters for Coptic and Latin to the UCS" (PDF). ISO/IEC JTC1/SC2/WG2.
- ^ a b "Section 7.3: Coptic, Supralineation"(PDF). The Unicode Standard. The Unicode Consortium. July 2017.
- ^ "Section 7.3: Coptic, Numerical Use of Letters" (PDF). The Unicode Standard. The Unicode Consortium. July 2016.
- Quaegebeur, Jan. 1982. "De la préhistoire de l'écriture copte." Orientalia lovaniensia analecta 13:125–136.
- Kasser, Rodolphe. 1991. "Alphabet in Coptic, Greek". In The Coptic Encyclopedia, edited by Aziz S. Atiya. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Volume 8. 30–32.
- Kasser, Rodolphe. 1991. "Alphabets, Coptic". In The Coptic Encyclopedia, edited by Aziz S. Atiya. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Volume 8. 32–41.
- Kasser, Rodolphe. 1991. "Alphabets, Old Coptic". In The Coptic Encyclopedia, edited by Aziz S. Atiya. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, Volume 8. 41–45.
- Wolfgang Kosack: Koptisches Handlexikon des Bohairischen. Koptisch - Deutsch - Arabisch. Verlag Christoph Brunner, Basel 2013, ISBN 978-3-9524018-9-7.
Last edited on 1 May 2021, at 13:10
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.