Global Financial Centres Index

The Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI) is a ranking of the competitiveness of financial centres based on over 29,000 financial centre assessments from an online questionnaire together with over 100 indices from organisations such as the World Bank, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the Economist Intelligence Unit. The first index was published in March 2007. It has been jointly published twice per year by Z/Yen Group in London and the China Development Institute in Shenzhen since 2015,[1][2] and is widely quoted as a top source for ranking financial centres.[3][4][5][6]

Logo

GFCI 34 (September 2023) edit

The latest thirty-fourth edition of the Global Financial Centres Index (GFCI 34) was published on 28 September 2023.[7] GFCI 34 provides evaluations of future competitiveness and rankings for 121 financial centres around the world. Rankings are based on around 10,000 qualitative surveys from respondents working in financial services and related industries combined with 153 quantitative factors, with measures from the World Bank, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the OECD and United Nations.[8][2] The 2023 report ranks New York at the top position followed by London and Singapore.[9] Only the top 20 are shown in the following table:

Rank Centre Rating Change in rank Change in rating
1   New York City 763     3
2   London 744     13
3   Singapore 742     19
4   Hong Kong 741     19
5   San Francisco 735     14
6   Los Angeles 734     15
7   Shanghai 733     16
8   Washington, D.C. 732   3   19
9   Chicago 731   1   15
10   Geneva 730   13   29
11   Seoul 729   1   15
12   Shenzhen 728     16
13   Beijing 727     16
14   Frankfurt 726   3   19
15   Paris 725   1   15
16   Luxembourg 724   3   19
17   Boston 723   8   8
18   Zürich 722   2   18
19   Amsterdam 721   3   13
20   Tokyo 720   1   17

Financial centre profiles edit

The latest report ranked 120 international financial centres into the following matrix:[7]

Level Broad and deep
Global leaders
Relatively broad
Global diversified
Relatively deep
Global specialists
Emerging
Global contenders
Global

  Singapore
  London
  New York City
  Frankfurt
  Shanghai
  Tokyo
  Toronto
  Amsterdam
  Zürich
  Sydney*

  Paris
  Seoul
  Washington, D.C.
  Chicago
  Los Angeles
  San Francisco

  Beijing
  Hong Kong
  Dubai*
  Luxembourg
  Shenzhen
  Abu Dhabi
  Casablanca*

  Moscow

Level Broad and deep
Established international
Relatively broad
International diversified
Relatively deep
International specialists
Emerging
International contenders
International

  Berlin
  Bangkok*
  Madrid
  Kuala Lumpur*
  Busan
  Boston*
  Stuttgart
  Edinburgh
  Melbourne
  MiamiΔ
  Hamburg*
  Dublin
  Geneva
  Brussels
  Osaka*
  Montreal
  Vancouver
  Stockholm
  Milan
  Rome

  Mexico City
  Athens*

  Guangzhou
  Mumbai*
  New Delhi*
  Chengdu
  Riyadh*
  Dalian*
  Cayman Islands*
  GIFT City
  Qingdao
  Kigali
  Taipei
  Astana*
  Jersey*
  Tel Aviv*
  Guernsey*
  Liechtenstein*

  Saint Petersburg*
  Istanbul
  São Paulo
  Cape Town
  Panama
  Bermuda*
  Nairobi
  British Virgin Islands
  Bahrain
  Johannesburg
  Mauritius
  Budapest*
  Lagos*
  Doha

Level Broad and deep
Established players
Relatively broad
Local diversified
Relatively deep
Local specialists
Emerging
Evolving centres
Local

  Warsaw
  Atlanta*
  Munich
  Oslo
  Glasgow
  Prague
  Copenhagen
  Minneapolis–Saint Paul
  Lisbon
  Calgary
  San Diego
  Helsinki
  Wellington

  Santiago
  Vienna*

  Hangzhou*
  Kuwait City*
  Tianjin*
  Nanjing*
  Malta
  Tehran
  Gibraltar
  Monaco
  Lugano
  Isle of Man*
  Reykjavík

  Buenos Aires
  Baku
  Ho Chi Minh City
  Bogotá
  Trinidad and Tobago
  Almaty*
  Manila*
  Bratislava*
  Jakarta
  Rio de Janeiro
  Vilnius*
  Cyprus*
  The Bahamas
  Wuhan
  Sofia*
  Riga
  Xi'an*

(*) Centres that have moved between categories between GFCI 33 and GFCI 34.
(Δ) Centres that have appeared in GFCI 34 but not in GFCI 33.

Top 15 centres by area of competitiveness edit

This is run for five separate areas of competitiveness to assess how financial centres perform in each of the areas.[7]

Level Business environment Human capital Infrastructure Financial sector development Reputational and general
1   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City
2   Singapore   London   Singapore   Singapore   London
3   London   Singapore   London   London   Singapore
4   Hong Kong   Hong Kong   Washington, D.C.   Hong Kong   Hong Kong
5   Beijing   San Francisco   Luxembourg   Shenzhen   San Francisco
6   Shanghai   Washington, D.C.   Shenzhen   Shanghai   Washington, D.C.
7   Washington, D.C.   Shanghai   Hong Kong   Frankfurt   Shanghai
8   Amsterdam   Seoul   Seoul   Beijing   Seoul
9   San Francisco   Beijing   Beijing   Los Angeles   Beijing
10   Los Angeles   Los Angeles   Shanghai   Luxembourg   Los Angeles
11   Zürich   Chicago   Frankfurt   Washington, D.C.   Chicago
12   Luxembourg   Zürich   San Francisco   San Francisco   Zürich
13   Frankfurt   Tokyo   Amsterdam   Boston   Tokyo
14   Paris   Boston   Sydney   Seoul   Boston
15   Chicago   Geneva   Los Angeles   Chicago   Geneva

Key areas edit

The business environment factors aggregate and value the regulation, tax rates, levels of corruption, economic freedom and how difficult in general it is to do business. To measure regulation an online questionnaire has been used.

The human capital factors summarize the availability of a skilled workforce, the flexibility of the labour market, the quality of the business education and the skill-set of the workforce, and quality of life.

The infrastructure factors account for the price and availability of office space at the location, as well as public transport.

The financial sector development factors assess the volume and value of trading in capital markets and other financial markets, the cluster effect of the number of different financial service companies at the location, and employment and economic output indicators.

Reputational and general considers more subjective aspects such as innovation, brand appeal, cultural diversity and competitive positioning.

Top 15 centres by industry sector edit

The index provides sub-rankings in the main areas of financial services – banking, investment management, insurance, professional services, government and regulation, finance, fintech, and trading.[7]

Level Banking Investment management Insurance Professional services Government and regulatory Finance Fintech Trading
1   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City   New York City
2   Shenzhen   London   London   Singapore   London   London   London   Singapore
3   Shanghai   Singapore   Shenzhen   London   Washington, D.C.   Shanghai   Singapore   Los Angeles
4   Beijing   Shanghai   Singapore   Hong Kong   Singapore   Shenzhen   Hong Kong   London
5   London   Beijing   Shanghai   Seoul   Seoul   Beijing   Zürich   Beijing
6   Singapore   Shenzhen   Beijing   Washington, D.C.   Tokyo   Hong Kong   San Francisco   Seoul
7   Luxembourg   Hong Kong   Los Angeles   San Francisco   San Francisco   San Francisco   Frankfurt   Washington, D.C.
8   Hong Kong   Geneva   Hong Kong   Los Angeles   Shanghai   Singapore   Amsterdam   San Francisco
9   Los Angeles   San Francisco   Boston   Luxembourg   Frankfurt   Washington, D.C.   Chicago   Shanghai
10   Washington, D.C.   Los Angeles   San Francisco   Shanghai   Los Angeles   Luxembourg   Copenhagen   Hong Kong
11   San Francisco   Chicago   Geneva   Geneva   Hong Kong   Frankfurt   Dubai   Shenzhen
12   Geneva   Zürich   Sydney   Chicago   Luxembourg   Los Angeles   Washington, D.C.   Tokyo
13   Chicago   Dubai   Seoul   Frankfurt   Chicago   Chicago   Geneva   Chicago
14   Boston   Luxembourg   Washington, D.C.   Boston   Zürich   Amsterdam   Berlin   Boston
15   Paris   Boston   Miami   Dubai   Boston   Berlin   Shanghai   Miami

References edit

  1. ^ Yeandle, Mark (September 2016). "The Global Financial Centres Index 20". Long Finance. Archived from the original on Jul 18, 2023.
  2. ^ a b Jones, Huw (24 March 2022). "New York widens lead over London in top finance centres index". Reuters. Archived from the original on Oct 8, 2022. Retrieved 10 September 2022. Rankings are based on surveys and 150 factors, with quantitative measures from the World Bank, The Economist Intelligence Unit, the OECD and United Nations.
  3. ^ See, for example, Yoshio Okubo (October 2014). "Comparison of Global Financial Center" (PDF). Harvard Law School, Program on International Financial Systems, Japan-U.S. Symposium. Archived from the original on 30 May 2015. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  4. ^ Glover, John (17 March 2014). "New York Strips London of Mantle as World's Top Financial Center". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on Jun 9, 2015. Retrieved 30 May 2015.
  5. ^ Pooler, Michael (1 October 2014). "New York and London vie for crown of world's top financial centre". The Financial Times. Archived from the original on 2 Oct 2014. Retrieved 24 May 2015.
  6. ^ "Seoul's Rise as a Global Financial Center". The Korea Society. 21 September 2012. Archived from the original on 10 December 2017. Retrieved 25 May 2015.
  7. ^ a b c d Wardle, Mike; Mainelli, Michael (28 September 2023). "The Global Financial Centres Index 34" (PDF). London: Z/Yen. Retrieved 28 September 2023. {{cite magazine}}: Cite magazine requires |magazine= (help)
  8. ^ https://www.longfinance.net/programmes/financial-centre-futures/global-financial-centres-index/gfci-publications/global-financial-centres-index-31/ 24 March 2022
  9. ^ Wee, Denise. "Singapore Overtakes Hong Kong in World Financial Centers Ranking". www.bloomberg.com. Retrieved 22 September 2022.

External links edit