Higher Superstition
Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science is a 1994 book about the philosophy of science by the biologist Paul R. Gross and the mathematician Norman Levitt.[1]
Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science
CountryUnited States
SubjectPhilosophy of science
PublisherJohns Hopkins University Press
Publication date
Media typePrint (hardcover and paperback)
This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Levitt states he is a leftist trying to save the "academic left" from itself by exposing misuses and abuses of science to advance political goals.
Topics discussed include: cultural constructivism or social constructivism, the strong programme, the science criticism of Stanley Aronowitz and Bruno Latour, post-modernism and deconstructionism and their influence on American academia, the science criticism of Andrew Ross, feminist science criticism, environmentalist science criticism and "apocalyptic naturism", Jeremy Rifkin's influential "pseudoscientific alarmism", attacks on medical research connected with AIDS activism and animal rights advocacy, and Afrocentrism. The book also questions human activity's relationship with climate change. The authors find it unfortunate that social scientists and literary critics often consider themselves qualified to criticize the natural sciences without learning much about them in detail, and worry about what would replace Enlightenment ideals of universalism and rationalism, and objective truths about the natural world as ascertained by a scientific methodology of repeatable experiments, if these were to be discredited, as many science critics in the humanities wish to do.
Reception and influence
The book inspired the 1996 Sokal hoax, in which Alan Sokal published a bogus paper in a postmodernist journal that did not peer-review submissions.[2] Sokal stated in an interview that while he was initially skeptical about Higher Superstition, he concluded after reading the works Gross and Levitt criticized that they were describing them fairly in "about 80 percent of the cases".[3]
See also
Science wars
Notes and references
  1. ^ Gross, Paul R.; Levitt, Norman (1997-11-06). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science. JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-5707-2.
  2. ^ Dawkins, Richard (2007-04-01). "Postmodernism Disrobed". Archived from the original on 2011-01-20. Retrieved 2010-09-24.
  3. ^ Ruark, Jennifer (1 January 2017). "Bait and Switch: How the physicist Alan Sokal hoodwinked a group of humanists and why, 20 years later, it still matters". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 7 January 2017.
Further reading
External links
Higher Superstition – at books.google.com

This article about a science-related book is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
Last edited on 25 September 2021, at 11:37
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy
Terms of Use
 Home Random  Nearby  Log in  Settings  Donate  About Wikipedia  Disclaimers