This article reads like a press release or a news article and may be largely based on routine coverage. (July 2017) |
John Gastil (born 1967) currently holds a joint appointment as Professor of Communication Arts & Sciences and Professor of Political Science at Penn State University. He is known for his research on deliberative democracy and group decision making.
John Gastil | |
|---|---|
| Born | 1967 |
| Title | Professor of Communication Arts & Sciences, Professor of Political Science |
| Academic work | |
| Institutions | Penn State University, The McCourtney Institute for Democracy |
| Main interests | Citizens' Initiative Review, Deliberative democracy |
Biography edit
John Gastil was born in San Diego and raised in a Quaker family. His experiences in Quaker meetings sparked his interest in how people work within groups to make decisions, reach a consensus at certain times, and defend their positions through reason and evidence.[1] Gastil earned a B.A. in political science from Swarthmore College in 1989 and an M.A. (1991) and Ph.D. (1994) in Communication Arts from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He previously taught at the University of Washington and served as Head of the Department of Communication Arts & Sciences and as Director of The McCourtney Institute for Democracy at Penn State University.[2]
Research edit
Gastil’s early research culminated in his 1993 book Democracy in Small Groups. In it he explored the workings of group decision rules, the establishment and maintenance of democratic norms, and the emergence of deliberative practices.[3]
Some of his later research examined the jury, one of the most important venues through which ordinary citizens can deliberate and make consequential decisions. Building on the insights of Alexis de Tocqueville and others, Gastil and his coauthors produced in The Jury and Democracy the first large-scale study of how jury service affects those who participate. Gastil shows the effects on jury members’ civic attitudes, views about legal institutions, opinions about deliberation, and subsequent participation in politics.[4] The Jury and Democracy won the Ernest Bormann Research Award from the National Communication Association.[5]
Gastil is also widely credited for promoting deliberation among citizens during elections and in other political institutions.[6] In his book By Popular Demand, he proposed creating panels of citizens, chosen randomly to ensure a cross-section of society, to deliberate on ballot initiatives and referendums.[7] In 2010 Oregon became the first state to implement this idea through its Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR).[8] Oregon reports the results of these deliberations through the state’s official voter’s pamphlet. Similar policies have now been adopted by a handful of other states, and Gastil’s research on Oregon’s CIR has been cited repeatedly in both academic journals and the news media.[9][10][11] Gastil has testified before the legislatures of Oregon, Washington, and Massachusetts about these deliberative processes.[12]
Selected publications edit
• Gastil, J., Knobloch, K. (2020). Hope for democracy: How citizens can bring reason back into politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gastil, John, E. Pierre Deess, Philip J. Weiser, and Cindy Simmons (2010). The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civic Engagement and Political Participation. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Gastil, John (2000). By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Gastil, John (1993, 2nd. ed. 2014). Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
References edit
- ^ John Gastil, "The Spirit and Practice of Deliberative Democracy" http://jgastil.la.psu.edu/pdfs/SpiritAndPractice.pdf
- ^ John Gastil's CV http://cas.la.psu.edu/people/jwg22/MyCV
- ^ Gastil, John (1993, 2nd. ed. 2014). Democracy in Small Groups: Participation, Decision Making, and Communication.
- ^ Gastil, John, E. Pierre Deess, Philip J. Weiser, and Cindy Simmons (2010). The Jury and Democracy: How Jury Deliberation Promotes Civil Engagement and Political Participation.
- ^ "Group Communication Division". National Communication Association. 2016-10-17. Retrieved 2023-02-10.
- ^ Participedia, Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review http://participedia.net/en/methods/citizens-initiative-review Archived 2017-04-25 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ Gastil, John (2000). By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections.
- ^ Participedia, Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review http://participedia.net/en/methods/citizens-initiative-review Archived 2017-04-25 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ John Gastil's Google Scholar page https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=john+gastil&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C48&as_sdtp=
- ^ Koerth-Baker, Maggie (2012-08-15). "The Mind of a Flip-Flopper". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2023-02-10.
- ^ Shira Schoenberg, "Citizens' Statement on Massachusetts Marijuana Ballot Question Was Effective, but Little Known" http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/04/citizens_statement_on_marijuan.html
- ^ John Gastil's CV http://cas.la.psu.edu/people/jwg22/MyCV