Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GreenC bot 20: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
The Earwig (talk | contribs) →Discussion: re |
|||
Line 41:
::::Thanks for the ping. Truth is, the [[bus factor]] at peer review is often one, so this kind of thing often lingers for months to years before it's fixed and what's more, is often forgotten about and has to be rediscovered as an error. It's true that this not a particularly critical error, but having a bot look after this sort of automated task frees up volunteer time and headspace to work on other goals. [[User:Tom (LT)|Tom (LT)]] ([[User talk:Tom (LT)|talk]]) 04:35, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
:::The fact that the bot doesn't edit often doesn't seem like a problem to me if it's doing useful work. I'm inclined to approve now provided we haven't seen any issues in the existing behavior. — [[User:The Earwig|<span style="opacity:0.8;">The</span> Earwig]] ([[User talk:The Earwig|talk]]) 04:56, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
:The edits to [[Talk:Jitin Puthenchery]] are interesting. There are four instances of the peer review template, all duplicates. It thus takes 4 cycles to delete them - delete one, wait 7 days, delete the next, wait, etc.. it works, but takes multiple edits and about 30 days. Alternatively it could delete all instances when they are duplicates. -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #093;">'''C'''</span>]] 06:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
| |||