Page history - Wikipedia
Page history
Review aggregator
17 May 2021
2800:bf0:80e1:943:1dad:e829:f3c0:6bc0
Removed possibly vandalized reference
18:50
−105
25 January 2021
Piotrus
→‎Notable review aggregators: remove unreferenced section. Notable according to whom?
09:13
−443
31 December 2020
Roller26
Reverted edits by 2601:282:8102:9B60:B568:2A47:3C7B:CAC0 (talk) (HG) (3.4.10)
m
21:02
−36
2601:282:8102:9b60:b568:2a47:3c7b:cac0
→‎Other categories
20:56
+36
28 December 2020
143.176.30.65
→‎Music: Not notable.
16:04
−52
12 December 2020
86.143.198.30
→‎Video games
10:56
−19
29 November 2020
Monkbot
Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 7 templates: del empty params (4×); hyphenate params (7×);
m
11:16
−29
23 November 2020
Serols
Reverted edits by 43.245.123.240 (talk) (HG) (3.4.10)
m
12:21
−3
43.245.123.240
no edit summary
12:21
+3
20 September 2020
Finnusertop
→‎Bibliography: remove stub template from start-class article
m
17:34
−14
3 August 2020
ST47
Reverted edits by Ivanloch (talk) to last version by Hipal
m
05:52
−77
Ivanloch
added 2 more tech review aggregators
m
05:07
+77
17 June 2020
Hipal
Reverted edits by Jehodon (talk) to last version by SS49
m
19:17
−37
Jehodon
→‎Video games
18:53
+23
Jehodon
→‎Video games
18:48
+14
17 May 2020
SS49
date formats per MOS:DATEFORMAT by script
m
11:16
+68
10 May 2020
Hipal
→‎Review aggregator for brands: linkspam - spammed
15:44
−118
Hipal
Undid revision 938522749 by 194.35.118.190 (talk) linkspam
15:36
−41
27 April 2020
Praxidicae
mass spam linking
m
17:45
−45
LobCity13
Added to list
m
14:25
+45
25 March 2020
2600:1700:7e31:5710:20af:a06d:1524:a64c
→‎Review Aggregator for brands
20:47
2600:1700:7e31:5710:20af:a06d:1524:a64c
→‎Review Aggregator for Brands
20:46
31 January 2020
194.35.118.190
→‎Notable review aggregators
18:49
+41
25 January 2020
DemonDays64
Importing Wikidata short description: "System that collects reviews of products and services" (Shortdesc helper)
m
19:51
+76
5 November 2019
64.229.5.232
no edit summary
23:52
−16
21 October 2019
Brayan Jaimes
→‎Books
16:06
+17
17 October 2019
Ady1689
Completion at review aggregation for brands
m
17:20
+36
23 September 2019
103.44.235.254
→‎Video games
07:50
+16
24 August 2019
79.70.40.128
→‎Music: Added a new aggregator under music
13:13
+22
79.70.40.128
→‎Film and television: Fixed previous error
13:12
−22
79.70.40.128
→‎Film and television: Added notable music site
13:11
+22
5 August 2019
156.57.214.222
no edit summary
00:22
−99
10 July 2019
Emrit24
Review aggregators can be for consumers or brands. Added section for Brands.
m
15:01
−6
Emrit24
Review aggregators can be for consumers or brands. Added section for Brands.
m
14:58
+88
8 April 2019
Praxidicae
Undid revision 881141780 by 66.205.217.136 (talk)
13:18
−102
27 February 2019
165.49.25.99
no edit summary
11:01
+109
31 January 2019
66.205.217.136
Some review aggregators are business facing so that brands can analyze the sentiment of reviews in bulk.
18:36
+102
13 January 2019
2a02:908:1019:4820:198:b82d:a766:6db3
→‎Video games: unnotable
11:41
−16
11 January 2019
Neilyamit
→‎Video games: added whatoplay is a new review aggregator that may become a notable source in the future
11:57
+16
8 January 2019
Xia
→‎top
18:20
+424
12 November 2018
AnomieBOT
Dating maintenance tags: {{Refimprove}}
m
20:55
+2
27.2.128.46
no edit summary
18:54
+2
4 November 2018
Newslinger
→‎E-Commerce: Actually, these are rating sites
05:08
−57
Newslinger
→‎E-Commerce: Add ResellerRatings and Trustpilot. Remove Trustami, which doesn't have its own article. Write the article first.
05:06
−147
2 November 2018
71.38.215.97
no edit summary
18:13
+1
25 October 2018
Isk030
Edit a well known Review aggregator in e-commerce branche
13:08
+204
18 September 2018
Alaney2k
the work's name is the globe and mail
m
03:44
+4
15 August 2018
Jukeboksi
→‎Financial services: removed SuperMoney as it is a Comparison shopping website, not a review aggregator. Removed empty heading === Financial services ===
17:05
−43
Jukeboksi
→‎Notable review aggregators: removed Comic Book Roundup as it was a redirect back to this article
m
17:01
−39
10 July 2018
Izno
→‎Notable review aggregators: if it doesn't have an article, only questionably notable
18:13
−308
older 50
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy
Terms of Use
Desktop
HomeRandomNearbyLog inSettingsDonateAbout WikipediaDisclaimers