Uniform Code of Military Justice: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

21 April 2024

11 October 2023

23 August 2023

13 August 2023

10 August 2023

30 July 2023

23 June 2023

2 June 2023

31 May 2023

19 May 2023

8 May 2023

9 April 2023

5 April 2023

4 April 2023

26 January 2023

25 January 2023

28 October 2022

8 August 2022

5 June 2022

1 May 2022

3 March 2022

18 February 2022

11 February 2022

25 November 2021

16 July 2021

25 June 2021

17 January 2021

  • curprev 20:0120:01, 17 January 2021107.137.156.134 talk 39,506 bytes −87 Whoever made the last edit misinterpreted the effect of Woodrich V. Devich. This case specifically brought into question an AFROTC cadet who was ordered to active duty and subjected to court martial for failing to attend classes after being disqualified from pilot training. He sought rescission of his enlistment contract and writ of Habeus corpus for misrepresentation of terms of his enlistment contract. While on ADT or IDT orders, the terms of the enlistment contract attach UCMJ jurisdiction. undo Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit

20 December 2020

30 November 2020

10 November 2020

9 November 2020

7 September 2020

3 June 2020

20 May 2020

10 April 2020

4 April 2020

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)