Talk:Southern Provinces: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
A Jalil (talk | contribs)
Line 18:
:::::Yep. There are more articles on Western Sahara than I would say 20 african countries grouped together. The backer plan II in 2003 was such that many taught that with the Republicans in office and with a high caliber diplomat as Baker asking for the plan to be forced on the parties, many jumped to the idea that "that's it". Militants and Polisario support groups started grow like mushrooms. On Wikipedia, some militants had such a zeal that you would think they behave as if someone (high in Polisario)is checking every day how the boys' are managing. The reward will come later when the long-awaited republic will be a reality. I remember I told koavf (but he never listens), and I tell Arre now, that whatever we write, and how much we disagree on things, all we write here changes nothing on the ground, and will never do. Expect fish to live outside water, but don't expect Morocco giving away the "Southern Provinces". The rest is just B*******. Cheers. --[[User:A Jalil|A Jalil]] 10:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
:::::: Can we revive this? I see no reason for the multiplicity of articles on this narrow subject. [[User:Collounsbury|collounsbury]] 11:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC).
 
::::::: This article and the "free zone" one go hand in hand. No problem with me to remove both and integrate the text to Western Sahara article.--[[User:A Jalil|A Jalil]] 13:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 
== Edit Warring Again ==