Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 41.75.220.212 (talk) (HG) (3.1.22) |
|||
Line 84:
The recent{{when|date=February 2016}} popularity of [[Cognitive Model#Dynamical systems|dynamical systems]] in [[philosophy of mind]] have added a new perspective on the debate; some authors{{which|date=February 2016}} now argue that any split between connectionism and computationalism is more conclusively characterized as a split between computationalism and [[Cognitive Model#Dynamical systems|dynamical systems]].
In 2014, Arthur Graves from Deepmind published a series of paper describing a novel Deep Neural Network structure called Neural Turing Machine<ref>{{cite web|last1=Graves|first1=Arthur|title=Neural Turing Machines|url=https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.5401}}</ref> able to read symbols on a tape and store symbols in memory. Relational Networks, another Deep Network module published by Deepmind are able to create object-like representations and manipulate them to answer complex questions. Relational Networks and Neural Turing Machines are yet another evidence that connectionism and computationalism need not be at odds.
==See also==
| |||