Content deleted Content added
→Perma.cc and Wikipedia: added relevant comment => FWIW - yes - *entirely* agree - a better way for editors to utilize the Perma.cc archival service(s) on behalf of Wikipedia would be *greatly* welcomed by many I would think - in any case - Enjoy! :) ~~~~ |
|||
Line 31:
:::(I am Green Cardamom; name changed). Wish there was a way we could apply for Wikipedia users to use the service. They may not be interested due to the volume. But 10 links a month is fairly limiting. -- [[User:GreenC|<span style="color: #006A4E;">'''Green'''</span>]][[User_talk:GreenC|<span style="color: #009933;">'''C'''</span>]] 22:17, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
::::Sorry for the mix-up. Yes, that would be great, even if it were through an application service a la WP Library. [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 22:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
FWIW - yes - *entirely* agree - a better way for editors to utilize the [[Perma.cc|Perma.cc archival service(s)]] on behalf of [[Wikipedia]] would be *greatly* welcomed by many I would think - in any case - Enjoy! :) [[User:Drbogdan|Drbogdan]] ([[User talk:Drbogdan|talk]]) 15:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
| |||