Content deleted Content added
Rescuing 3 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v2.0beta15) (Eastmain) |
|||
Line 10:
It was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.<ref>Moskovkin, VM (2008) [http://dspace.bsu.edu.ru/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4853/1/Moskovkin_Institutional%20policies.pdf Institutional policies for open access to the results of scientific research] . ''Scientific and Technical Information Processing''. '''35''' (6) 269–273, {{doi|10.3103/S0147688208060075}}</ref><ref>Sale, AHJ (2007) [http://eprints.utas.edu.au/410/ The patchwork mandate] . ''D-Lib Magazine'', '''13''' (1/2). {{ISSN|1082-9873}}</ref><ref>Manikandan, S; N Isai Vani (2010) "[http://www.jpgmonline.com/article.asp?issn=0022-3859;year=2010;volume=56;issue=2;spage=154;epage=156;aulast=Manikandan Restricting access to publications from funded research: Ethical issues and solutions.]" ''Journal of Postgraduate Medicine'' '''56'''(2): 154–156</ref><ref>Lyons, Charles; H Austin Booth (2010) "An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management". ''Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship'' '''16'''(2): 1080124 {{doi|10.1080/08963568.2011.554786}}</ref><ref>Hurrell, A. C. (2012) [http://www.bclabrowser.ca/bcla2/index.php/browser/article/view/390/553 Open access policies on scholarly publishing in the university context]. BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape, 4(3).</ref> The ''Institutional Self-Archiving Policy Registry'' became the ''Registry of Open Access Repository Material Archiving Policies'' in 2006, then the ''Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies'', and then the ''Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies'' around 2014.<ref name=fos2006 /><ref>{{cite web |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141227204605/http://roarmap.eprints.org/ |archivedate=27 December 2014 |url=http://roarmap.eprints.org |title=Roarmap.eprints.org |deadurl=yes |df= }}</ref>
ROARMAP mandates are classified in terms of strength and effectiveness<ref>Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.8174 Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.8174.</ref> in MELIBEA<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/default.php|title=MELIBEA directory and estimator of institutional open-access policies
<!-- ==See also==
-->
Line 18:
==External links==
{{Wikidata property |1= P4203}}
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20121030222530/http://roar.eprints.org/ Official site of ROAR]
*[http://roarmap.eprints.org/ Official site of ROARMAP]
;Links related to mandates
Line 28:
*[http://roarmap.eprints.org/56/ Liege Mandate]
*[http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/funding-mandates/ UNESCO worldwide list of funder mandates]
*[https://web.archive.org/web/20180223005321/http://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/default.php MELIBEA] (Mandates Classified by Strength)
{{Open access navbox}}
| |||