Content deleted Content added
→Indefinite block: Reply |
|||
Line 562:
:{{u|Barkeep49}}, I respect whatever you think makes the most sense for the betterment of the encyclopedia. If that's [x] days off, then a 1/0RR for [y] time, then I appreciate the opportunity. And to reiterate, yes, edit-warring is unconstructive and does not result in a collaborative encyclopedia. Edit-warring is not an alternative to discussing how a page should be changed in favor of consensus. ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
::Unfortunately this doesn't convince me that you understand what edit warring is which is what I'd asked for in my initial statement. Discussion is how we avoid edit warring but that's an answer to a different question. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 21:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:::{{u|Barkeep49}}, Edit warring is behavior where more than one user repeatedly reverts a page in whole or part in lieu of or without reference to discussion for consensus (i.e. if someone continues reverting but ''also'' posts to talk as a perfunctory way of having posted to talk but isn't actually engaged in consensus seeking). ―[[User:Koavf|Justin (<span style="color:grey">ko'''a'''vf</span>)]]<span style="color:red">❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯</span> 21:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of [[Template:Scottish English editnotice]] ==
| |||