The effects of any judicial decision on the common law
, on the interpretation of statutes, or on any other application of law, can, in effect, be nullified by legislation, unless the particular decision of the court in question involves application of the Canadian Constitution
, in which case, the decision (in most cases) is completely binding on the legislative branch. This is especially true of decisions which touch upon the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
, which cannot be altered by the legislative branch unless the decision is overridden pursuant to section 33 (the "notwithstanding clause
Courtroom in the current Supreme Court building
However, prior to 1949, the Supreme Court did not constitute the court of last resort
: litigants could appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
in London. As well, some cases could bypass the court and go directly to the Judicial Committee from the provincial courts of appeal. The Supreme Court formally became the court of last resort for criminal appeals in 1933 and for all other appeals in 1949. The last decisions of the Judicial Committee on cases from Canada were made in the mid-1950s, as a result of their being heard in a court of first instance prior to 1949.
The increase in the importance of the Supreme Court was mirrored by the numbers of its members; it was established first with six judges, and these were augmented by an additional member in 1927. In 1949, the bench reached its current composition of nine justices.
Prior to 1949, most of the appointees to the court owed their position to political patronage
. Each judge had strong ties to the party in power at the time of their appointment. In 1973, the appointment of a constitutional law professor Bora Laskin
as chief justice represented a major turning point for the court. Increasingly in this period, appointees either came from academic backgrounds or were well-respected practitioners with several years experience in appellate courts. Laskin's federalist and liberal views were shared by Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau
, who recommended Laskin's appointment to the court.
Supreme Court of Canada building
The Constitution Act, 1982
, greatly expanded the role of the court in Canadian society by the addition of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
, which greatly broadened the scope of judicial review. The evolution from the Dickson court (1984–90) through to the Lamer court (1990–2000) witnessed a continuing vigour in the protection of civil liberties. Lamer's criminal law background proved an influence on the number of criminal cases heard by the Court during his time as chief justice. Nonetheless, the Lamer court was more conservative with Charter
rights, with only about a 1% success rate for Charter
Lamer was succeeded as the chief justice by Beverly McLachlin
in January 2000. She was the first woman to hold that position.
McLachlin's appointment resulted in a more centrist and unified court. Dissenting and concurring opinions were fewer than during the Dickson and Lamer courts. With the 2005 appointments of puisne justices Louise Charron
and Rosalie Abella
, the court became the world's most gender-balanced national high court with four of its nine members being female.
Justice Marie Deschamps
' retirement on 7 August 2012 caused the number to fall to three;
however, the appointment of Suzanne Côté
on 1 December 2014 restored the number to four. After serving on the court for 28 years, 259 days (17 years, 341 days as chief justice), McLachlin retired in December 2017. Her successor as the chief justice is Richard Wagner
The structure of the Canadian court system
is pyramidal, a broad base being formed by the various provincial and territorial courts whose judges are appointed by the provincial or territorial governments. At the next level are the provinces' and territories' superior courts, where judges are appointed by the federal government. Judgments from the superior courts may be appealed to a still higher level, the provincial or territorial courts of appeal.
The Supreme Court rests at the apex of the judicial pyramid. This institution hears appeals from the provincial courts of last resort, usually the provincial or territorial courts of appeal, and the Federal Court of Appeal, although in some matters appeals come straight from the trial courts, as in the case of publication bans
and other orders that are otherwise not appealable.
In most cases, permission to appeal must first be obtained from the court. Motions for leave to appeal
to the court are generally heard by a panel of three of its judges and a simple majority is determinative. By convention, this panel never explains why it grants or refuses leave in any particular case, but the court typically hears cases of national importance or where the case allows it to settle an important issue of law. Leave is rarely granted, meaning that for most litigants, provincial courts of appeal are courts of last resort. But leave to appeal is not required for some cases, primarily criminal cases in which at least one appellate judge (on the relevant provincial court of appeal) dissented on a point of law, and appeals from provincial references
A final source of cases is the referral power of the federal government. In such cases, the Supreme Court is required to give an opinion on questions referred to it by the Governor in Council (the Cabinet
). However, in many cases, including the most recent same-sex marriage reference
, the Supreme Court has declined to answer a question from the Cabinet. In that case, the court said it would not decide if same-sex marriages
were required by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
, because the government had announced it would change the law regardless of its opinion, and subsequently did.
The Supreme Court thus performs a unique function. It can be asked by the Governor-in-Council to hear references considering important questions of law. Such referrals may concern the constitutionality or interpretation of federal or provincial legislation, or the division of powers
between federal and provincial spheres of government. Any point of law may be referred in this manner. However, the Court is not often called upon to hear references. References have been used to re-examine criminal convictions that have concerned the country as in the cases of David Milgaard
and Steven Truscott
The Supreme Court has the ultimate power of judicial review
over Canadian federal and provincial laws' constitutional validity. If a federal or provincial law has been held contrary to the division of power provisions of one of the various constitution acts, the legislature or parliament must either live with the result, amend the law so that it complies, or obtain an amendment to the constitution. If a law is declared contrary to certain sections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms
, Parliament or the provincial legislatures may make that particular law temporarily valid again against by using the "override power" of the notwithstanding clause
. In one case, the Quebec National Assembly
invoked this power to override a Supreme Court decision (Ford v Quebec (AG)
) that held that one of Quebec's language laws banning the display of English commercial signs was inconsistent with the Charter
. Saskatchewan has also used it to uphold its labour laws. This override power can be exercised for five years, after which time the override must be renewed or the decision comes into force.
In some cases, the court may stay the effect of its judgments so that unconstitutional laws continue in force for a period of time. Usually, this is done to give Parliament or a legislature sufficient time to enact a new replacement scheme of legislation. For example, in Reference Re Manitoba Language Rights
, the court struck down Manitoba's laws because they were not enacted in the French language, as required by the Constitution. However, the Court stayed its judgment for five years to give Manitoba time to re-enact all its legislation in French. It turned out five years was insufficient so the court was asked, and agreed, to give more time.
Constitutional questions may, of course, also be raised in the normal case of appeals involving individual litigants, governments, government agencies or Crown corporations
. In such cases the federal and provincial governments must be notified of any constitutional questions and may intervene
to submit a brief
and attend oral argument
at the court. Usually the other governments are given the right to argue their case in the court, although on rare occasions this has been curtailed and prevented by order of one of the court's judges.
The Supreme Court sits for 18 weeks of the year beginning the first Monday of October and usually runs until the end of June and sometimes into July. Hearings only take place in Ottawa
, although litigants can present oral arguments from remote locations by means of a video-conference system. Hearings are open to the public. Most hearings are taped for delayed telecast in both of Canada's official languages. When in session, the court sits Monday to Friday, hearing two appeals a day. A quorum consists of five members for appeals, but a panel of nine justices hears most cases.
On the bench, the chief justice of Canada
or, in his or her absence, the senior puisne
justice, presides from the centre chair with the other justices seated to his or her right and left by order of seniority of appointment. At sittings, the justices usually appear in black silk robes but they wear their ceremonial robes of bright scarlet trimmed with Canadian white mink in court on special occasions and in the Senate at the opening of each new session of Parliament.
Counsel appearing before the court may use either English or French. The judges can also use either English or French. There is simultaneous translation available to the judges, counsel and to members of the public who are in the audience.
The decision of the court is sometimes – but rarely – rendered orally at the conclusion of the hearing. In these cases, the court may simply refer to the decision of the court below to explain its own reasons. In other cases, the court may announce its decision at the conclusion of the hearing, with reasons to follow.
As well, in some cases, the court may not call on counsel for the respondent, if it has not been convinced by the arguments of counsel for the appellant.
In very rare cases, the court may not call on counsel for the appellant and instead calls directly on counsel for the respondent.
However, in most cases, the court hears from all counsel and then reserves judgment to enable the justices to write considered reasons. Decisions of the court need not be unanimous – a majority may decide, with dissenting reasons given by the minority. Each justice may write reasons in any case if he or she chooses to do so.
A puisne justice of the Supreme Court is referred to
as The Honourable Mr/Madam Justice
and the chief justice as Right Honourable
. At one time, judges were addressed as "My Lord" or "My Lady" during sessions of the court, but it has since discouraged this style of address and has directed lawyers to use the simpler "Justice", "Mr Justice" or "Madam Justice".
The designation "My Lord/My Lady" continues in many provincial superior courts and in the Federal Court of Canada and Federal Court of Appeal, where it is optional.
Every four years, the Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission
makes recommendations to the federal government about the salaries for federally appointed judges, including the judges of the Supreme Court. That recommendation is not legally binding on the federal government, but the federal government is generally required to comply with the recommendation unless there is a very good reason to not do so.
The chief justice receives $370,300 while the puisne justices receive $342,800 annually.
Appointment of justices
Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada are appointed on the advice
of the prime minister. The provinces and Parliament of Canada have no formal role in such appointments, sometimes a point of contention.
The Supreme Court Act
limits eligibility for appointment to persons who have been judges of a superior court or members of the bar
for ten or more years. Members of the bar or superior judiciary of Quebec, by law, must hold three of the nine positions on the Supreme Court of Canada.
This is justified on the basis that Quebec uses civil law
, rather than common law
, as in the rest of the country. As explained in the reasons in Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6
, sitting judges of the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal cannot be appointed to any of Quebec's three seats. By convention, the remaining six positions are divided in the following manner: three from Ontario; two from the western provinces, typically one from British Columbia and one from the prairie provinces, which rotate among themselves (although Alberta is known to cause skips in the rotation); and one from the Atlantic provinces, almost always[clarification needed]
from Nova Scotia or New Brunswick.
In 2006, an interview phase by an ad hoc
committee of members of Parliament was added. Justice Marshall Rothstein
became the first justice to undergo the new process. The prime minister still has the final say on who becomes the candidate that is recommended to the governor general for appointment to the court. The government proposed an interview phase again in 2008, but a general election and minority parliament intervened with delays such that the Prime Minister recommended Justice Cromwell
after consulting the leader of the Opposition
As of August 2016, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
opened the process of application to change from the above-noted appointment process. Under the revised process, "[any] Canadian lawyer or judge who fits specified criteria can apply for a seat on the Supreme Court, through the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs."
Functional bilingualism is now a requirement.
The current chief justice of Canada is Richard Wagner
. He was appointed to the court as a puisne judge on 5 October 2012 and appointed chief justice, 18 December 2017.
The nine justices of the Wagner Court are:
Length of tenure
The following graphical timeline depicts the length of each current justice's tenure on the Supreme Court (not their position in the court's order of precedence) as of 13 May 2021.
Among the current justices, Rosalie Abella is the longest-serving, with a tenure of 16 years, 256 days. Michael Moldaver and Andromache Karakatsanis share the distinction of having the second-longest tenure, 9 years, 204 days each, as they were both appointed puisne justice on the same day in October 2011. Richard Wagner's cumulative tenure is 8 years, 220 days—5 years, 74 days as puisne justice, and 3 years, 146 days as chief justice. Nicholas Kasirer has the briefest tenure, 1 year, 239 days. The length of tenure for the other justices are: Suzanne Côté, 6 years, 163 days; Russell Brown, 5 years, 255 days; and Malcom Rowe, 4 years, 197 days; and Sheilah Martin, 3 years, 146 days.
Rules of the court
The Rules of the Supreme Court of Canada
are located on the laws-lois.justice.gc.ca
website, as well as in the Canada Gazette
, as SOR/2002-216 (plus amendments), made pursuant to subsection 97(1) of the Supreme Court Act
. Fees and taxes are stipulated near the end.
Since 1967, the court has hired law clerks to assist in legal research. Between 1967 and 1982, each puisne justice was assisted by one law clerk and the chief justice had two. From 1982, the number was increased to two law clerks for each justice.
Currently, each justice has up to four law clerks.
Law clerks conduct research, draft bench memoranda
, and assist in drafting judgments, as well as any other research duties assigned by the law clerk's judge such as drafting speeches or articles.
The building was designed by Ernest Cormier
. The building is known for its Art Deco
including two candelabrum-style fluted metal lamp standards that flank the entrance, and the marble walls and floors of the grand interior lobby
contrasting with the châteauesque
roof. Construction began in 1939, with the cornerstone laid by Queen Elizabeth
, consort to King George VI
and later known as the Queen Mother. The court began hearing cases in the new building by January 1946.
Canada Post Corporation issued a 'Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa' stamp on 9 June 2011 as part of the Architecture Art Déco series.
Two flagstaffs have been erected in front of the building. A flag on one is flown daily, while the other is hoisted only on those days when the court is in session. Also located on the grounds are several statues, notably:
Inside there are busts of several chief justices:
Behind the building, along the cliff edge was once the home of hat maker R.J. Devlin at 41 Cliff Street, but demolished to make way for the court building.
The court was housed previously in two other locations in Ottawa:
- Railway Committee Room and a number of other committee rooms at the Centre Block on Parliament Hill 1876–1889 – later used as official meeting space for the federal Opposition Party Room was destroyed in fire and replaced with room built in 1916.
- Old Supreme Court building on Bank Street 1889–1945 – demolished in 1955 and used as parking for Parliament Hill
On 9 June 2011, Canada Post issued "Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa" designed by Ivan Novotny (Taylor|Sprules Corporation) and based on a photograph by Philippe Landreville as part of the Art Deco series. The stamps feature a photo of the Supreme Court of Canada, designed by Ernest Cormier in 1939, and were printed by Lowe-Martin Company, Inc.
- ^ "Role of the Court". Supreme Court of Canada. 23 May 2014. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
- ^ "The Right Honourable Beverley McLachlin, P.C., C.C." Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 18 November 2018.
- ^ "New judges fill gaps in spectrum". The Globe and Mail. 5 October 2004. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
- ^ " "Two women named to Canada's supreme court". UPI. 4 October 2004. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
- ^ "Supreme Court loses third veteran judge in a year with Justice Marie Deschamps' departure". Toronto Star. 18 May 2012. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
- ^ Ran Hirschl, “The View from the Bench: Where the Comparative Judicial Imagination Travels,” in: his Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, ISBN 978-0-19-871451-4), c. 1, pp. 20–76 at 21, 27.
- ^ R. v. Beare; R. v. Higgins Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine,  2 S.C.R. 387, para. 19.
- ^ Consortium Developments (Clearwater) Ltd. v. Sarnia (City) Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine,  3 S.C.R. 3, para. 1.
- ^ Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 2005 SCC 13,  1 S.C.R. 188, para. 1.
- ^ Whitbread v. Walley Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine,  3 S.C.R. 1273, para. 2.
- ^ Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 2005 SCC 13,  1 S.C.R. 188.
- ^ Canada, Supreme Court of (1 January 2001). "Supreme Court of Canada - Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)". www.scc-csc.ca.
- ^ Provincial Court Judges’ Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice); Ontario Judges’ Assn. v. Ontario (Management Board); Bodner v. Alberta; Conférence des juges du Québec v. Quebec (Attorney General); Minc v. Quebec (Attorney General) Archived 19 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine,  2 S.C.R. 286, 2005 SCC 44, para. 21.
- ^ "Judges Act". Minister and Attorney General of Canada. 9 June 2014. Retrieved 23 June 2014.
- ^ Supreme Court Act, s. 6.
- ^ Justin Trudeau (2 August 2016). "Why Canada has a new way to choose Supreme Court judges". The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 24 April 2017.
- ^ "New process for judicial appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada" (Press release). Government of Canada. 2 August 2016.
- ^ "Prime Minister announces advisory board to select the next Supreme Court justice". Prime Minister of Canada. 15 May 2019.
- ^ "The Hill: The wrangle over bilingualism". www.lawtimesnews.com.
- ^ "Applicants for SCC vacancy must be bilingual Westerners or Northerners". www.canadianlawyermag.com.
- ^ An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act, S.C. 1927, c. 38, s. 2.
- ^ Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S-26, s. 9.
- ^ a b "The Right Honourable Richard Wagner, P.C., Chief Justice of Canada". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Rosalie Silberman Abella". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Michael J. Moldaver". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Andromache Karakatsanis". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Suzanne Côté". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Russell Brown". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Malcolm Rowe". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Sheilah L. Martin". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 13 November 2018.
- ^ "The Honourable Nicholas Kasirer". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 16 September 2019.
- ^ The Supreme Court of Canada / La Cour Suprême du Canada. Ottawa: Supreme Court of Canada. 2005. p. 7.
- ^ "Law Clerk Program". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 12 May 2019.
- ^ "SCC Building". Ottawa, Ontario: Supreme Court of Canada. Retrieved 18 November 2018.
- ^ "1940 – Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario". archiseek.com. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
- ^ a b c "Supreme Court of Canada, Ottawa" (Press release). Canada Post. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2014.
- ^ Cook, Marcia (11 May 2000). "Cultural consequence". Ottawa Citizen. Canwest. Archived from the original on 30 May 2010. Retrieved 11 October 2009.
- ^ "In Memoriam: Kenneth Jarvis 1927–2007"(PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2014. Retrieved 26 February 2015.
- ^ Kathryn Blaze Carlson (11 May 2011). "Liberals take their leave of the Railway Room". National Post.
- McCormick, Peter (2000), Supreme at last: the evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada, J. Lorimer, ISBN 1-55028-693-5
- Ostberg, Cynthia L (2007), Attitudinal decision making in the Supreme Court of Canada, UBC Press, ISBN 978-0-7748-1312-9
- Songer, Donald R (2008), The transformation of the Supreme Court of Canada: an empirical examination, University of Toronto Press, ISBN 978-0-8020-9689-0
Last edited on 1 May 2021, at 08:38
Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0
unless otherwise noted.