Talk:1951 in spaceflight

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ibemichael in topic LSP vs. Operator
Featured list1951 in spaceflight is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 6, 2023.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2021Featured list candidatePromoted

Please :) edit

We need to add the flags. Mickman1234 (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

LSP vs. Operator edit

What is the right way to document this?

For example, let's look at a launch of Aerobee RTV-A-1 from Holloman AFB. It's a US Air Force base, I believe operated by the ARDC (Air Research and Development Command) at the time, but I don't know if they control the whole base or just have a presence there. It's a major command of the air force. Who is the LSP? The "US Air Force" or "ARDC"? Who is the Operator? If a university is involved in the payload research, are they the sole operator?

A similar question could be asked about the launches done by the US Army / US Army Signal Corps.

--Ibemichael (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good question. Using 2009 in spaceflight as my guide, it seems whomever provides the rockets is the LSP. The operator is the agency on whose behalf the rocket is launched. So Mitsubishi provides the rockets for JAXA. ARDC might have run the base, but the Air Force contracted the rocket so they'd be the LSP, I think. The Operator would be the builders of the payload/the engineers getting test data. --Neopeius (talk)