Talk:Ahmed bin Muhammad bin Khalifa

An Article that is full of false historical claims edit

The person who wrote this article makes absurd historical claims. He claims that Shaikh Ahmad bin Muhammad known as Ahmad al-Fateh is a fictional character and that the Al Khalifa family didnot rule Zubarah and Qatar and cites no reference to back his claim. On the other hand if someone looks at Selections from the records of the Bombay Government New Series, No. XXIV, 1856 (Printed 1985 by THE OLEANDER PRESS, Cambridge, England), especially the reports of Francis Warden, Lieutenant S.Hennell, Lieutenant A.B.Kemball and Lieutenant H.F.Disbrowe he or she can without a shadow of doubt find out that the accusations made by the author of the article that is in your website to be completely false and baseless. Pardon me for being too long and I hope you share my concern regarding this matter as I respect and apprecaite wikipedia alot and always recommend it to my friends. I was really shocked to find this article that is full of blatant lies and fallacies.Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).Selections from the records of the Bombay Government New Series, No. XXIV, 1856 (Printed 1985 by THE OLEANDER PRESS, Cambridge, England —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.6.74 (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply