Copy of Airline inventory, maybe to be used in other articles (after rewordings) edit

Aircraft Inventory edit

Aircraft Origin Type Versions In service[1] Notes
Trainers
Aerotec T-23 Uirapuru   Brazil trainer T-23 7
k-8   China trainer K-8 6
Beechcraft T-34 Mentor   United States trainer FMA T-34B 21
Canadair T-33 Silver Star   Canada Attack/Trainer AT-33A 19
Lancair 320   United States trainer 1
NEIVA T-25 Universal   Brazil trainer 6
Pilatus PC-7 Turbo Trainer   Switzerland trainer 9
Helicopters
AS 350 B3   France utility helicopter 2
Eurocopter AS 532 Cougar   France transport 2
Aérospatiale SA 315 Lama   France utility helicopter SA 315B 2 one was suffered an accident months ago, 4 people died at least
Bell UH-1 Iroquois   United States utility helicopter UH-1H 12
Bell UH-1 Iroquois   United States utility helicopter UH-1H 15
Bell 212 Twin Huey   United States utility helicopter 14
Transports
Basler BT-67   United States transport 1 An upgraded turboprop powered DC-3
Beechcraft Baron   United States Utility 55 2
Beechcraft Bonanza   United States utility V35 2
Beechcraft King Air   United States staff transport Super King Air 200 4
BAE Systems 146   United Kingdom transport 146–100 4
CASA C-212 Aviocar   Spain transport 3
Cessna 152   United States utility 10
Cessna 172 Skyhawk   United States utility 172K 2
Cessna 185 Skywagon   United States utility 2
Cessna 206 Stationair   United States utility 11
Cessna 210 Centurion   United States utility 4
Cessna 310   United States utility 1
Cessna 402   United States utility 402B 1
Cessna 421 Golden Eagle   United States utility 421B 1
Convair 580   United States transport 2
Fokker F27 Friendship   Netherlands transport F27-400M 4
Learjet 25   United States VIP transport 25B
25D
1
1
Lockheed C-130 Hercules   United States transport C-130A
C-130B
C-130H
2
4
1
McDonnell Douglas DC-10   United States transport DC-10-10F /DC-10-30F 2 acquired in late 2007[2]
Piper PA-34 Seneca   United States utility 2
Rockwell Sabreliner   United States VIP transport Sabreliner 60 1

References

  1. ^ Aerospace Sourcebook. Aviation Week & Space Technology 2009, 26 JAN 2009 240. Web. 14 Aug 2009.
  2. ^ Bolivian military aviation OrBat

Dubious statement in Economy section. edit

In the economy section this quote appears:

"In recent history, Bolivia has consistently led Latin America in measures of economic growth, fiscal stability and foreign reserves"

I think this may be out of context from the source with says, "Unlike any time in recent history, Bolivia has consistently led Latin America in measures of economic growth, fiscal stability and foreign reserves. Plenty has flowed into coffers of gas companies as well." The context of this quote is the short term boom from gas, rather than a long term economic success. Indeed, it specifically says that this growth is "Unlike recent history".

In fact, Bolivia still ranks close to the bottom in most indices of the size or success of the economy, when compared with its neigbbours. This sentence doesn't give that impression. Zeimusu | Talk page 13:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Population contradiction edit

Numbers and ranking of cities disagrees with List of cities and largest towns in Bolivia but both claim to be from 2012 census. 伟思礼 (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

can Bolivia now be classified as Dominant-party or not? edit

the MAS-IPSP party of Bolivia has been the ruling party of Bolivia ever since the mid 2000's, and it has a large control over the politics sector of the country. is this enough to be considered dominant-party or not? if so, then i will add that to the infobox of the country. JEVILOGEN (talk) 21:25, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not sufficient in this format, which would be WP:SYNTH. The question would be whether sufficient reliable sources according to their due weight describe it as such. JArthur1984 (talk) 23:44, 22 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'd note that even if the country could have been reasonably regarded as a dominant party state, it may no longer fall into that category. I've seen a couple of sources describing the MAS as "no longer" hegemonic, even if its remains the most powerful party (Examples: 1, 2, 3). The party currently seem to be heading towards a split by the next election. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply