Talk:Branko Kadia, Jordan Misja and Perlat Rexhepi

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Doggy54321 in topic Requested move 14 June 2021

Kadia/Kadija edit

10 Kadia - 1 Kadija--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 08:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Misja edit

Since Antid knows Albanian he could really understand the reference here. It is the nephew of Jordan Misja reacting against the claim made by head of Rozafa-Moraca society (which is used in the article as reference). The nephew of hero Jordan Misja bears the same name as his uncle and says that what the head of Moraca-Rozafa claims is false because Jordan Misja was an Albanian and their surname is Misja not Misovic. The surname Misja is an Albanian surname and it is found also in Elbasan and Tirane. Personally I admire everyone (Albanian or not) who fought against occupation in Albania. I've created article on Greek-Albanians partisan units and also Greek-Albanian WWII heroes in wiki, and also on Italian partisan units in Albania etc. I would be also honored to write about Montenegrin-Serb community role in WWII Albania. However this particular claim looks like falsity. I would like from everybody to not put it in ethnic terms, ok. Aigest (talk) 08:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Still needs some clarifying, I've returned the deleted material and added an other source which quotes Misja's nephew; rearranged the section to emphasize Kadija and Misja's social (religious) background rather than claims of their possible ethnic one.--Zoupan 05:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Branko Kadia, Jordan Misja and Perlat Rexhepi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 14 June 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus (closed by non-admin page mover) D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


Branko Kadia, Jordan Misja and Perlat RexhepiThree heroes of Shkodër – This is the title they are known by as it is indicated in the article. It is also more suitable than having their three names listed as the article title. Kj1595 (talk) 08:09, 14 June 2021 (UTC) Relisting. Natg 19 (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Colonestarrice (talk) 07:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:47, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • @Kj1595 and Buidhe: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose to use a non-neutral label like "hero" in the article, it must be shown that it's the common name in English. I see no evidence of that. (t · c) buidhe 11:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, sources are using that construction. Much better than the current unwieldy title. No such user (talk) 13:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Closing comment: no comments have been made in almost two months, and the previous two relistings haven't done anything. Therefore, I am closing this discussion as no consensus. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 20:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.