Talk:Cambridge, Massachusetts

Untitled

See Talk:Cambridge, Massachusetts/Archive 1 for info on map requests.

mi vs km ?.

15,000/sq mi (5,700/km2) Wrong. 15,000/sq mi = (24140.16/km2) Correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Csihistoricscientist (talk • contribs) 23:55, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

The number given is not an area, it's a population density, of 15,000 people per sq mi, and that does corresponds to a population density of 5791 people per sq km. Rounding down to 5700 is appropriate.--agr (talk) 00:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Cambridge, Massachusetts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140430114806/http://www.cambridgehistory.org/discover/candy/squirrel.html to http://www.cambridgehistory.org/discover/candy/squirrel.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120524035019/http://articles.boston.com/2011-09-16/business/30165912_1_gates-and-jobs-microsoft-granite-stars to http://articles.boston.com/2011-09-16/business/30165912_1_gates-and-jobs-microsoft-granite-stars
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150605232916/https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities.aspx to https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150605232913/https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/sanjoselasfloreselsalvador to https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/sanjoselasfloreselsalvador
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150605232919/https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/yerevanarmenia to https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/yerevanarmenia
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150605232909/https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/lescayeshaiti to https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/lescayeshaiti
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150605232819/https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/cienfuegoscuba to https://www.cambridgema.gov/peace/sistercities/cienfuegoscuba

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Speakeasy Blues Club

This article states "The Hound Dogs became the house band at the legendary Speakeasy Blues Club in Central Square in Cambridge." The Hound Dogs formed the basis of the Broadcasters, who backed Ronnie Earl for a number of years. I realise the term 'legendary' is freely thrown around like confetti, but there is no mention of the club in the article. Did it have any relevance or 'notability' ? Incidentally, I am English, and therefore have no local knowledge to draw upon. Thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Formation of Massachusetts towns.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Recent edits about the Mass. Pike

2601:196:4601:8ff0:8349:9b0a:8414:3207 (talk · contribs) seems to have added several recent edits that do not seem to make sense, and aggressively defended them against reversion. For instance, "→‎Road: Massachusetts Turnpike actually does passes Cambridge because if your at a Car, Bus or Commuter Rail, you can see Cambridge on the other side, and that counts as passing through.", does not seem to make any sense. Obviously whether you can see something "on the other side" [of what?] is not the definition of "passing through." Similarly "Do not remove it again please. It does pass Cambridge. Look at the map of Boston. Search Interstate 90 find Allston." does not seem helpful for to make sense.

The content of the edits doesn't make sense either. "The Massachusetts Turnpike passes the half of Cambridge" is ungrammatical, as is "passes the through the half of." I guess maybe Ajd (talk · contribs) would revert these anyhow, but if not I will do so shortly, although I wanted to give :3207 a chance to respond.

(Perhaps there is confusion about "passing Cambridge" versus "passing through Cambridge"? Those have very different meanings in English--indeed, they are arguably opposites. You cannot do both.) jhawkinson (talk) 03:40, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I had a look at the map, and the Turnpike doesn't cross the Charles River into Cambridge. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)