Wikipedia

Talk:Human rights in Egypt

Latest comment: 12 days ago by Zakawer in topic Add a lead section, and remove bias against post-Morsi authorities
Learn more about this page

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vittoriafalsone. Peer reviewers: Aasif24350, Nhannguyen2002.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kwats37.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sharia POV edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed a line stating: "Islam is not practiced properly in Law; it is not a shariah state. The practice of Christianity or Judaism is not felt to conflict with Sharia." I think perhaps the author did not mean this to be said in a POV way, but the words 'properly' and 'felt' connote POV. If someone can reword it to be accurate and neutral, please do! -- MoxRox (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article has been edited to remove content as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Text entered in [1] duplicated at least in part material from [2] and [3].

For example, this sentence was taken with little alteration from the first source:

The Muslim protesters called on the authorities to intervene and release Camilia, raising banners calling for Al-Azhar to protect those who convert to Islam from the punishment of the Coptic Orthodox Church.

This sentence was taken with little alteration from the second source:

In Ramadan, Hundreds of Muslim worshippers and activists from the social networking website Facebook protested Sunday night outside Amr Ibn el-Aas Mosque and Al-Nour Mosque in Old Cairo, calling for the release of Camilia Shehata, the wife of a priest who has allegedly converted to Islam and then disappeared around a month.

Other content added by this contributor may have been copied from other sources and has been removed in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. ----Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add a lead section, and remove bias against post-Morsi authorities edit

Latest comment: 12 days ago8 comments3 people in discussion

Like the headline to this section says. Also, make it clear in the lead section that human rights are protected by the Egyptian Constitution of 2014. In addition, up-to-date information from 2015 and 2016 regarding human rights should be added. Zakawer (talk) 20:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Zakawer: This article still has a cleanup tag: has this article's bias not been corrected? Jarble (talk) 17:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's still not fully been corrected. Zakawer (talk) 20:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Zakawer: Which details in this article are still incorrect or outdated? Jarble (talk) 15:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The majority of the article, in fact. Zakawer (talk) 15:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Zakawer and Louis P. Boog: The article cites Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch; are these not reliable sources? Jarble (talk) 16:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Jarble they are reliable to the best of my knowledge Louis P. Boog (talk) 19:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch are notable organizations and it is often worth mentioning them on an article like this one, but we shouldn't always uncritically report literally everything stated by these two organizations as though it were completely true, which could potentially lead to unwarranted NPOV violations. And where possible, we should include as many counter-statements and rebuttals from the Egyptian government, Egyptian parliament, National Council for Human Rights, National Strategy for Human Rights and National Dialogue. Zakawer (talk) 01:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Human rights in Egypt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The International Complicity section is not encyclopedic or relevant edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

None of the content in this section is well written - just quotes from news. And even if it was well written, the subject matter is not one that is relevant - it is not seriously discussed at large, and the complicity described in these sources is not even as severe or substantive as something like Nazi Collaborationism (which is well researched, documented, and discussed.). The content here is just a tabulation of political ties and random goings on. I want to delete this section. QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Drastically trimmed section --Louis P. Boog (talk) 14:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Reply
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Human_rights_in_Egypt&oldid=1218658242"